Life cycle assessment of solid recovered fuel (SRF) for energy sector in declining coal region: Environmental burden of SRF production

IF 7.6 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management-X Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100989
J. Čespiva , D. Kupka , J. Ryšavý , L. Niedzwiecki , W.-H. Chen , M. Jackowski , C.-C. Wang , J.-K. Kuo , A. Trusek , C.-C. Cormos , T. Ochodek
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of solid recovered fuel (SRF) for energy sector in declining coal region: Environmental burden of SRF production","authors":"J. Čespiva ,&nbsp;D. Kupka ,&nbsp;J. Ryšavý ,&nbsp;L. Niedzwiecki ,&nbsp;W.-H. Chen ,&nbsp;M. Jackowski ,&nbsp;C.-C. Wang ,&nbsp;J.-K. Kuo ,&nbsp;A. Trusek ,&nbsp;C.-C. Cormos ,&nbsp;T. Ochodek","doi":"10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides a comprehensive insight into solid recovered fuel (SRF) production and its potential as a coal supplement in the post-coal region of Moravia-Silesia, Czech Republic. Such studies on waste-to-energy (WtE) applications are often lacking, particularly at critical moments when decisions about regional energy strategies are being made. As a result, viable and less environmentally harmful pathways stand outside consideration.</div><div>In this study, SRF production is investigated using life cycle assessment (LCA), applying the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology with data from EF 3.0, ELCD and Ecoinvent 3.8. A scenario analysis was also conducted on transport modes and distances. The initial region-oriented scheme of the LCA study included the following steps: separation of waste material, transport to a processing plant, SRF production, and transport to an energy facility. The results present the overall environmental burden associated with SRF production. The most significant impact is observed in “climate change” indicator, accounting for 78 % of the total impact. The primary contributors to the impact are plastics (77.2 %), wood (13.5 %), coal (3.1 %), and transport (2.1 %). The scenario analysis, covering transport distances of 200–400 km, clearly demonstrated that rail transport is a more environmentally friendly option compared to road transport, with minimal sensitivity to variations in distance within the evaluated range. This study uncovers unique insights into alternative SRF production and evaluates its environmental burden through available interpretations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37131,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100989"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525001217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive insight into solid recovered fuel (SRF) production and its potential as a coal supplement in the post-coal region of Moravia-Silesia, Czech Republic. Such studies on waste-to-energy (WtE) applications are often lacking, particularly at critical moments when decisions about regional energy strategies are being made. As a result, viable and less environmentally harmful pathways stand outside consideration.
In this study, SRF production is investigated using life cycle assessment (LCA), applying the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology with data from EF 3.0, ELCD and Ecoinvent 3.8. A scenario analysis was also conducted on transport modes and distances. The initial region-oriented scheme of the LCA study included the following steps: separation of waste material, transport to a processing plant, SRF production, and transport to an energy facility. The results present the overall environmental burden associated with SRF production. The most significant impact is observed in “climate change” indicator, accounting for 78 % of the total impact. The primary contributors to the impact are plastics (77.2 %), wood (13.5 %), coal (3.1 %), and transport (2.1 %). The scenario analysis, covering transport distances of 200–400 km, clearly demonstrated that rail transport is a more environmentally friendly option compared to road transport, with minimal sensitivity to variations in distance within the evaluated range. This study uncovers unique insights into alternative SRF production and evaluates its environmental burden through available interpretations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煤炭衰退地区能源部门固体回收燃料生命周期评价:固体回收燃料生产的环境负担
本研究对捷克共和国摩拉维亚-西里西亚后煤炭地区的固体回收燃料生产及其作为煤炭补充的潜力提供了全面的见解。这种关于废物转化为能源的应用的研究往往缺乏,特别是在制定区域能源战略决策的关键时刻。因此,可行的、对环境危害较小的途径不在考虑之列。在本研究中,采用生命周期评估(LCA),应用产品环境足迹(PEF)方法研究SRF生产,数据来自EF 3.0, ELCD和Ecoinvent 3.8。还对运输方式和距离进行了情景分析。LCA研究的最初面向区域的计划包括以下步骤:废物分离、运输到加工厂、SRF生产和运输到能源设施。结果显示了与SRF生产相关的总体环境负担。影响最大的是“气候变化”指标,占总影响的78%。造成这种影响的主要因素是塑料(77.2%)、木材(13.5%)、煤炭(3.1%)和运输(2.1%)。覆盖200-400公里运输距离的情景分析清楚地表明,与公路运输相比,铁路运输是一种更环保的选择,在评估范围内对距离变化的敏感性最小。本研究揭示了替代SRF生产的独特见解,并通过现有的解释评估了其环境负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Energy Conversion and Management: X is the open access extension of the reputable journal Energy Conversion and Management, serving as a platform for interdisciplinary research on a wide array of critical energy subjects. The journal is dedicated to publishing original contributions and in-depth technical review articles that present groundbreaking research on topics spanning energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management, and sustainability. The scope of Energy Conversion and Management: X encompasses various forms of energy, including mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic, and electric energy. It addresses all known energy resources, highlighting both conventional sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power, as well as renewable resources such as solar, biomass, hydro, wind, geothermal, and ocean energy.
期刊最新文献
How fast is fast? Sizing and simulation of EV charging stations under operational uncertainty Semi-analytical evaluation of thermal management strategies for embedded cable/pipe systems: Asymmetric coating, conductive surface and insulation layer A novel three-stage direct expansion cycle with optimal internal heat recovery and splitting-mixing processes for utilising LNG’s cold energy Collaborative optimization of integrated energy systems in energy-intensive industrial clusters considering carbon-green-certificate trading Experimental performance investigation of flat plate solar collector based on the effect of contact materials between absorber plate and riser tube
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1