A new framework for the technical biogas potential: Concept design, method development, and analytical application in a case study from Germany

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115645
Matthias Steindl , Thomas J. Venus , Konrad Koch
{"title":"A new framework for the technical biogas potential: Concept design, method development, and analytical application in a case study from Germany","authors":"Matthias Steindl ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Venus ,&nbsp;Konrad Koch","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A flexible framework for estimating the technical and unused biomass potential for biogas production with high spatial resolution has been developed to integrate biomethane into future energy systems. By classifying agricultural biomass into non-competitive biomass (NCB), livestock-competitive biomass (LCB), and food/feed-competitive biomass (FCB), the model accounts for their competing uses in livestock production and food security. Applied to Bavaria, the analysis covers 2,229 municipalities, using data from agricultural enterprises, biomass yields, and biogas production. The results show an unused methane potential of 1.58·10<sup>9</sup> m<sup>3</sup> from agricultural NCB and LCB, potentially covering 12.2 % of Bavaria's natural gas consumption in 2021. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to account for uncertainty in the underlying data and to perform a sensitivity analysis. The results highlight that agricultural policy decisions, particularly those affecting livestock production, significantly influence the technical biogas potential: Decreases in manure and slurry formation may reduce the potential, but this could be offset by the availability of unused biomass from livestock feed, depending on policy choices. The presented framework may be used for different regions given availability of data, while the results offer valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders for developing the biogas sector and its integration into a renewable energy system in the studied region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 115645"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A flexible framework for estimating the technical and unused biomass potential for biogas production with high spatial resolution has been developed to integrate biomethane into future energy systems. By classifying agricultural biomass into non-competitive biomass (NCB), livestock-competitive biomass (LCB), and food/feed-competitive biomass (FCB), the model accounts for their competing uses in livestock production and food security. Applied to Bavaria, the analysis covers 2,229 municipalities, using data from agricultural enterprises, biomass yields, and biogas production. The results show an unused methane potential of 1.58·109 m3 from agricultural NCB and LCB, potentially covering 12.2 % of Bavaria's natural gas consumption in 2021. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to account for uncertainty in the underlying data and to perform a sensitivity analysis. The results highlight that agricultural policy decisions, particularly those affecting livestock production, significantly influence the technical biogas potential: Decreases in manure and slurry formation may reduce the potential, but this could be offset by the availability of unused biomass from livestock feed, depending on policy choices. The presented framework may be used for different regions given availability of data, while the results offer valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders for developing the biogas sector and its integration into a renewable energy system in the studied region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术沼气潜力的新框架:概念设计、方法开发和分析应用——以德国为例
已经开发了一个灵活的框架,用于估算高空间分辨率的沼气生产技术和未使用的生物质潜力,以将生物甲烷纳入未来的能源系统。通过将农业生物质分为非竞争性生物质(NCB)、家畜竞争性生物质(LCB)和食物/饲料竞争性生物质(FCB),该模型解释了它们在畜牧业生产和粮食安全中的竞争性用途。应用于巴伐利亚州,该分析涵盖了2229个城市,使用了来自农业企业、生物质产量和沼气产量的数据。结果显示,农业NCB和LCB的未使用甲烷潜力为1.58·109立方米,可能在2021年覆盖巴伐利亚天然气消费量的12.2%。进行蒙特卡罗模拟以解释基础数据中的不确定性并进行敏感性分析。研究结果强调,农业政策决定,特别是那些影响畜牧业生产的政策决定,显著影响了技术沼气潜力:粪肥和泥浆形成的减少可能会降低沼气潜力,但这可能会被牲畜饲料中未使用的生物质的可用性所抵消,具体取决于政策选择。鉴于数据的可用性,所提出的框架可以用于不同的地区,而结果为政策制定者和利益相关者提供了宝贵的见解,以发展沼气部门并将其纳入研究地区的可再生能源系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Collective decision-making in energy transitions: A systematic review and a way forward Advancements in superstructures design and solver approaches for heat and mass exchange network synthesis Recent advances for thermal management of electronic devices: A state-of-the-art review A state-of-the-art review on decarbonizing aerospace manufacturing with life cycle sustainability assessment Power-to-protein: Convergent carbon capture, renewable energy, and microbial biomanufacturing for sustainable food security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1