Thromboprophylaxis in patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities post total joint arthroplasty

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-05834-8
Tiffany D. Ho, Christopher A. Keshishian, Sandeep S. Bains, Gabrielle N. Swartz, Reza Katanbaf, Jeremy A. Dubin, Ronald E. Delanois, Nirav K. Patel
{"title":"Thromboprophylaxis in patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities post total joint arthroplasty","authors":"Tiffany D. Ho,&nbsp;Christopher A. Keshishian,&nbsp;Sandeep S. Bains,&nbsp;Gabrielle N. Swartz,&nbsp;Reza Katanbaf,&nbsp;Jeremy A. Dubin,&nbsp;Ronald E. Delanois,&nbsp;Nirav K. Patel","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05834-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Thromboprophylaxis has significantly reduced the incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Recent studies have established protocols for VTE prevention using aspirin, given its comparable efficacy to prophylactic anticoagulants and a lower risk of bleeding complications. However, patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) or skilled nursing facilities (SNF) after TJA may require more potent agents due to an increased risk of VTE. This study aims to compare the incidence of symptomatic VTE and postoperative complications in TJA patients receiving aspirin versus anticoagulants in the setting of IPR and SNF.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed an all-payer, national database for patients who had hip and/or knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TJA between October 1, 2015 and April 30, 2021 (<i>n</i> = 713,548). Patients discharged to IPR or SNF were identified using CPT codes. A propensity score match was performed to limit potential confounders. Patients were stratified into aspirin (<i>n</i> = 2,343) and anticoagulant (<i>n</i> = 2,343) cohorts based on the postoperative VTE prophylaxis they received; anticoagulants included dabigatran, enoxaparin, heparin, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Complications were identified using ICD-10 codes and included VTE, aseptic revision, cardiac complications, periprosthetic joint infections, surgical site infections, the need for transfusion, and wound complications 90 days after surgery.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The aspirin cohort had a VTE incidence of 4.4% compared to 2.3% in the anticoagulant cohort (<i>p</i> &lt;.001), indicating nearly double the odds of VTE with aspirin use compared to anticoagulant. The odds ratio for VTE was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37–0.72), with the aspirin cohort as the reference. Incidence rates of other complications were similar between the two cohorts.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates a higher risk of VTE with aspirin compared to anticoagulant in patients discharged to IPR or SNF after primary TJA. Surgeons should consider using rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, heparin, dabigatran, or warfarin for VTE prophylaxis instead of aspirin in these high-risk patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05834-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Thromboprophylaxis has significantly reduced the incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Recent studies have established protocols for VTE prevention using aspirin, given its comparable efficacy to prophylactic anticoagulants and a lower risk of bleeding complications. However, patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) or skilled nursing facilities (SNF) after TJA may require more potent agents due to an increased risk of VTE. This study aims to compare the incidence of symptomatic VTE and postoperative complications in TJA patients receiving aspirin versus anticoagulants in the setting of IPR and SNF.

Methods

We reviewed an all-payer, national database for patients who had hip and/or knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TJA between October 1, 2015 and April 30, 2021 (n = 713,548). Patients discharged to IPR or SNF were identified using CPT codes. A propensity score match was performed to limit potential confounders. Patients were stratified into aspirin (n = 2,343) and anticoagulant (n = 2,343) cohorts based on the postoperative VTE prophylaxis they received; anticoagulants included dabigatran, enoxaparin, heparin, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Complications were identified using ICD-10 codes and included VTE, aseptic revision, cardiac complications, periprosthetic joint infections, surgical site infections, the need for transfusion, and wound complications 90 days after surgery.

Results

The aspirin cohort had a VTE incidence of 4.4% compared to 2.3% in the anticoagulant cohort (p <.001), indicating nearly double the odds of VTE with aspirin use compared to anticoagulant. The odds ratio for VTE was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37–0.72), with the aspirin cohort as the reference. Incidence rates of other complications were similar between the two cohorts.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a higher risk of VTE with aspirin compared to anticoagulant in patients discharged to IPR or SNF after primary TJA. Surgeons should consider using rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, heparin, dabigatran, or warfarin for VTE prophylaxis instead of aspirin in these high-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全关节置换术后住院康复和熟练护理机构患者的血栓预防
目的血栓预防显著降低全关节置换术(TJA)后静脉血栓栓塞事件(VTE)的发生率。最近的研究已经建立了使用阿司匹林预防静脉血栓栓塞的方案,因为阿司匹林的疗效与预防性抗凝剂相当,而且出血并发症的风险较低。然而,由于静脉血栓栓塞的风险增加,TJA后入院的住院康复(IPR)或熟练护理设施(SNF)的患者可能需要更有效的药物。本研究旨在比较在IPR和SNF的情况下,接受阿司匹林和抗凝剂治疗的TJA患者的症状性静脉血栓栓塞和术后并发症的发生率。方法:我们回顾了2015年10月1日至2021年4月30日期间接受原发性TJA的髋关节和/或膝关节骨关节炎患者的全付费国家数据库(n = 713,548)。使用CPT代码对IPR或SNF出院患者进行识别。进行倾向评分匹配以限制潜在的混杂因素。根据患者术后静脉血栓栓塞的预防情况,将患者分为阿司匹林组(n = 2343)和抗凝剂组(n = 2343);抗凝剂包括达比加群、依诺肝素、肝素、利伐沙班和华法林。使用ICD-10代码确定并发症,包括静脉血栓栓塞、无菌翻修、心脏并发症、假体周围关节感染、手术部位感染、需要输血和术后90天伤口并发症。结果阿司匹林组静脉血栓栓塞发生率为4.4%,而抗凝剂组为2.3% (p <.001),表明阿司匹林组静脉血栓栓塞的发生率几乎是抗凝剂组的两倍。以阿司匹林组为参照,静脉血栓栓塞的优势比为0.52 (95% CI: 0.37-0.72)。其他并发症的发生率在两个队列之间相似。结论:本研究表明,与抗凝剂相比,在原发性TJA后出院的IPR或SNF患者服用阿司匹林发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险更高。对于这些高危患者,外科医生应考虑使用利伐沙班、依诺肝素、肝素、达比加群或华法林来预防静脉血栓栓塞,而不是阿司匹林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Retrospective study of mechanical complications after cephalomedullary nail implantation from 2019 to 2024 following per-, sub- or intertrochanteric femur fractures Pediatric shoulder instability: epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis and treatment Diagnostic familiarity with osteochondroma among primary physicians: a retrospective analysis of 195 referred cases Outcomes of internal fixation for pediatric proximal femoral fractures using a 3.5 mm T-plate Vancouver B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur: options for treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1