Recommendations for a Communication Strategy to Support Informed Decision-Making About Self or Clinician Sampling for Cervical Screening in the UK: Qualitative Study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1111/hex.70191
Denitza Williams, Eleanor Clarke, Kate J. Lifford, Lindsay Haywood, Fiona Wood, Jo Waller, Adrian Edwards, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Caroline Evans, Gareth Powell, Rhiannon Phillips, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Katie Walbeoff, Ardiana Gjini, Kate Brain
{"title":"Recommendations for a Communication Strategy to Support Informed Decision-Making About Self or Clinician Sampling for Cervical Screening in the UK: Qualitative Study","authors":"Denitza Williams,&nbsp;Eleanor Clarke,&nbsp;Kate J. Lifford,&nbsp;Lindsay Haywood,&nbsp;Fiona Wood,&nbsp;Jo Waller,&nbsp;Adrian Edwards,&nbsp;Natalie Joseph-Williams,&nbsp;Caroline Evans,&nbsp;Gareth Powell,&nbsp;Rhiannon Phillips,&nbsp;Andrew Carson-Stevens,&nbsp;Katie Walbeoff,&nbsp;Ardiana Gjini,&nbsp;Kate Brain","doi":"10.1111/hex.70191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cervical screening for high-risk Human Papillomavirus subtypes is offered to those eligible in the UK via the NHS cervical screening programmes. However, uptake of cervical screening continues to remain below the national target of 80%. Groups less likely to participate include people from low socioeconomic groups, ethnic minority backgrounds, younger/older age and/or LGBTQ group identity. The cervical screening-eligible population could soon, for the first time in the UK, have a choice of mode between clinician taken or self-sampling.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To understand information and decision-support needs of diverse cervical screening-eligible individuals when presented with a choice of cervical screening mode and develop recommendations for a communication strategy to support informed decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative co-production explored communication preferences and decision-support needs in a diverse sample of cervical screening-eligible individuals using semi-structured interviews with individuals eligible for cervical screening (<i>n</i> = 30) and stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 23). Interviews were transcribed, thematically analysed and mapped to behavioural and decision-making theories to inform a communication strategy for offering choice in cervical screening mode in the UK.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four main themes across both participant groups were identified: misunderstanding of clinician screening, attitudes towards choice, communication launch preferences and decision-support needs. Logic models to inform a communication strategy in preparation for the future launch of choice in cervical screening mode in the UK were developed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The communication launch strategy can inform interventions to support informed decision-making if HPV self-sampling is incorporated into UK cervical screening programmes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient and Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Two public partners were involved in the study from inception to completion. They advised on recruitment, participant facing documents and were involved in analysis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70191","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cervical screening for high-risk Human Papillomavirus subtypes is offered to those eligible in the UK via the NHS cervical screening programmes. However, uptake of cervical screening continues to remain below the national target of 80%. Groups less likely to participate include people from low socioeconomic groups, ethnic minority backgrounds, younger/older age and/or LGBTQ group identity. The cervical screening-eligible population could soon, for the first time in the UK, have a choice of mode between clinician taken or self-sampling.

Aims

To understand information and decision-support needs of diverse cervical screening-eligible individuals when presented with a choice of cervical screening mode and develop recommendations for a communication strategy to support informed decision-making.

Methods

Qualitative co-production explored communication preferences and decision-support needs in a diverse sample of cervical screening-eligible individuals using semi-structured interviews with individuals eligible for cervical screening (n = 30) and stakeholders (n = 23). Interviews were transcribed, thematically analysed and mapped to behavioural and decision-making theories to inform a communication strategy for offering choice in cervical screening mode in the UK.

Results

Four main themes across both participant groups were identified: misunderstanding of clinician screening, attitudes towards choice, communication launch preferences and decision-support needs. Logic models to inform a communication strategy in preparation for the future launch of choice in cervical screening mode in the UK were developed.

Implications

The communication launch strategy can inform interventions to support informed decision-making if HPV self-sampling is incorporated into UK cervical screening programmes.

Patient and Public Contribution

Two public partners were involved in the study from inception to completion. They advised on recruitment, participant facing documents and were involved in analysis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建议沟通策略,以支持知情决策的自我或临床医生抽样子宫颈筛查在英国:定性研究
背景高危人类乳头瘤病毒亚型子宫颈筛查是通过英国国民健康保险制度子宫颈筛查计划向符合条件的人提供的。然而,子宫颈普查的接受率仍然低于80%的国家目标。不太可能参与的群体包括社会经济地位较低的群体、少数民族背景、年龄较小/较大的群体和/或LGBTQ群体。在英国,宫颈筛查符合条件的人群很快就可以在临床医生采集或自我抽样之间进行选择。目的了解不同子宫颈筛查人群在选择子宫颈筛查方式时的信息和决策支持需求,并提出沟通策略建议,以支持知情决策。方法采用半结构化访谈,对符合子宫颈筛查条件的个体(n = 30)和利益相关者(n = 23)进行了定性合作,探讨了不同样本子宫颈筛查条件下的沟通偏好和决策支持需求。访谈被转录,主题分析和映射到行为和决策理论,以告知在英国提供子宫颈筛查模式选择的沟通策略。结果两组参与者确定了四个主要主题:对临床医生筛查的误解,对选择的态度,沟通启动偏好和决策支持需求。制定了逻辑模型,为今后在联合王国推出子宫颈筛查模式的选择提供信息交流策略。如果将HPV自我抽样纳入英国子宫颈筛查规划,传播启动策略可以为干预措施提供信息,以支持知情决策。从研究开始到完成,有两个公共合作伙伴参与了研究。他们就招聘、面向参与者的文件提供咨询意见,并参与分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
'What Do People With Long Covid Want From Healthcare Services?' A Qualitative Exploration From Lived Experience. Lived Experiences of Returning to Participation After Mild Stroke: A Phenomenological Study in Spain. Preconception Perceptions, Knowledge and Behaviours of Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Study. Social Needs Screening Tools for Clinical Populations in Australia and New Zealand: A Scoping Review and Critical Analysis. Socio-Ecological Factors Influencing Maternal and Child Health Outcomes During Floods in South Punjab Pakistan 2025: A Mixed-Methods Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1