A comparison of the effect of aromatherapy with Jasmine (Jasminum) and clary sage (Salvia officinalis) on sexual dysfunction in women of reproductive age: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1175_23
Zahra Hajabdollahi, Marzeyeh Loripoor, Maryam Mohseni, Parvin Khalili
{"title":"A comparison of the effect of aromatherapy with Jasmine (Jasminum) and clary sage (Salvia officinalis) on sexual dysfunction in women of reproductive age: A randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Zahra Hajabdollahi, Marzeyeh Loripoor, Maryam Mohseni, Parvin Khalili","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1175_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual dysfunction affects various aspects of life. Aromatherapy is easier and less risky than other methods of taking herbal medicines. Against this backdrop, this study aims to compare the effect of aromatherapy with Jasminum and Salvia officinalis on sexual dysfunction in women of reproductive age.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This triple-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 168 women aged 15 to 45 who were referred to Rafsanjan Comprehensive Health Services Center no. 1 from February 2022 to June 2022, using a systematic sampling method. Individuals with an FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index) score of less than 28 were randomly assigned to 4 aromatherapy groups of Jasminum and Salvia officinalis as well as sweet almond (placebo) and control. The aromatherapy groups used the relevant aroma twice a day for 6 weeks, yet the control group received no intervention. After the completion of the intervention, the FSFI questionnaire was filled in once again by all participants. Besides, data analysis was conducted using the SPSS software, Chi<i>-</i>squared test, Fisher's test, ANOVA, Kruskal<i>-</i>Wallis test, Wilcoxon test, and a paired samples <i>t</i>-test. In addition, a <i>P</i> value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (IQR) score of sexual function before the intervention in Jasminum, Salvia officinalis, sweet almond, and control groups was 25.50 (21.27-82.25), 25.80 (20.27-57.50), 25.00 (23.27-10.10), and 25.90 (23.26-92.42), respectively. After the intervention, the score was 28.30 (25.30-60.45), 28.45 (25.31-90.12), 29.00 (27.30-10.80), and 25.35 (23.26-27.32) in the abovementioned groups, respectively. The comparison of the median score of sexual function in the four groups after the intervention showed a statistically significant difference between Jasminum, Salvia officinalis, and sweet almond groups with the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Additionally, the effect of Salvia officinalis was higher than that of Jasminum in the domains of mental arousal, lubrication, and sexual pain (<i>P</i> < 0.0125).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both aromas, i.e., Jasminum and Salvia officinalis, were effective in improving sexual dysfunction in women of reproductive age. The effect of Salvia officinalis was better than that of Jasminum in the domains of mental arousal, lubrication, and sexual pain. More studies are recommended to be conducted in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1175_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sexual dysfunction affects various aspects of life. Aromatherapy is easier and less risky than other methods of taking herbal medicines. Against this backdrop, this study aims to compare the effect of aromatherapy with Jasminum and Salvia officinalis on sexual dysfunction in women of reproductive age.

Materials and methods: This triple-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 168 women aged 15 to 45 who were referred to Rafsanjan Comprehensive Health Services Center no. 1 from February 2022 to June 2022, using a systematic sampling method. Individuals with an FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index) score of less than 28 were randomly assigned to 4 aromatherapy groups of Jasminum and Salvia officinalis as well as sweet almond (placebo) and control. The aromatherapy groups used the relevant aroma twice a day for 6 weeks, yet the control group received no intervention. After the completion of the intervention, the FSFI questionnaire was filled in once again by all participants. Besides, data analysis was conducted using the SPSS software, Chi-squared test, Fisher's test, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon test, and a paired samples t-test. In addition, a P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The median (IQR) score of sexual function before the intervention in Jasminum, Salvia officinalis, sweet almond, and control groups was 25.50 (21.27-82.25), 25.80 (20.27-57.50), 25.00 (23.27-10.10), and 25.90 (23.26-92.42), respectively. After the intervention, the score was 28.30 (25.30-60.45), 28.45 (25.31-90.12), 29.00 (27.30-10.80), and 25.35 (23.26-27.32) in the abovementioned groups, respectively. The comparison of the median score of sexual function in the four groups after the intervention showed a statistically significant difference between Jasminum, Salvia officinalis, and sweet almond groups with the control group (P < 0.001). Additionally, the effect of Salvia officinalis was higher than that of Jasminum in the domains of mental arousal, lubrication, and sexual pain (P < 0.0125).

Conclusions: Both aromas, i.e., Jasminum and Salvia officinalis, were effective in improving sexual dysfunction in women of reproductive age. The effect of Salvia officinalis was better than that of Jasminum in the domains of mental arousal, lubrication, and sexual pain. More studies are recommended to be conducted in this field.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
茉莉花(Jasminum)和鼠尾草(Salvia officinalis)芳香疗法对育龄妇女性功能障碍的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
背景:性功能障碍影响生活的各个方面。芳香疗法比其他服用草药的方法更容易,风险更小。在此背景下,本研究旨在比较芳香疗法与茉莉花、鼠尾草对育龄妇女性功能障碍的影响。材料和方法:这项三盲随机临床试验对168名15至45岁的妇女进行了研究,这些妇女被转介到拉夫桑詹综合卫生服务中心。1、从2022年2月至2022年6月,采用系统抽样方法。FSFI(女性性功能指数)得分低于28分的个体被随机分配到4个香薰组,包括茉莉、鼠尾草、甜杏仁(安慰剂)和对照组。芳香疗法组每天两次使用相关的香气,持续6周,而对照组则没有接受任何干预。干预结束后,所有参与者再次填写FSFI问卷。数据分析采用SPSS软件、卡方检验、Fisher检验、方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Wilcoxon检验和配对样本t检验。另外,P值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:茉莉组、丹参组、甜杏仁组和对照组干预前性功能IQR评分中位数分别为25.50(21.27 ~ 82.25)、25.80(20.27 ~ 57.50)、25.00(23.27 ~ 10.10)、25.90(23.26 ~ 92.42)。干预后,上述组得分分别为28.30(25.30-60.45)、28.45(25.31-90.12)、29.00(27.30-10.80)、25.35(23.26-27.32)。干预后四组患者性功能中位数评分比较,茉莉组、鼠尾草组、甜杏仁组与对照组差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。此外,丹参在精神唤醒、润滑和性疼痛方面的作用高于茉莉花(P < 0.0125)。结论:茉莉花和鼠尾草两种香气均能有效改善育龄妇女性功能障碍。丹参在精神唤醒、润滑、性痛等方面的作用优于茉莉。建议在这一领域进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety symptoms of earthquake survivors. Scientometric study of learning circles in medical education: Trends, collaborative networking, and citation dynamics. Resolving the organ transplantation challenges by 3D bioprinting: A scoping review on case studies. Smoking status among hypertensive patients in Mosul City. Relationship between dentistry students' psychomotor skills, and fixed prosthodontics performance, their self-estimate and self-efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1