Monitoring the Evolving Match Environment in Emergency Medicine 2023.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.5811/westjem.18562
Anthony Sielicki, Brian Milman, Andrew Little, Miriam Kulkarni, James Morris, Laura Hopson, Michael Kiemeney
{"title":"Monitoring the Evolving Match Environment in Emergency Medicine 2023.","authors":"Anthony Sielicki, Brian Milman, Andrew Little, Miriam Kulkarni, James Morris, Laura Hopson, Michael Kiemeney","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 2023 National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) Match in emergency medicine (EM) left 554 spots and 132 EM programs unfilled. The Council of Residency Directors Match Task Force sought to characterize the programs that did and did not fill, learn more about their Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP) applicants, determine residency programs' needs for future NRMP Matches, and inquire what actions program leaders would like to see to promote a healthy future for training in EM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a web-based survey of EM residency program leadership during March and April 2023. We generated descriptive statistics from these survey results. Thematic analysis was used for free-text responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 287 programs, 160 (55.7%) responded to the survey, including 59 of 132 programs (44.7%) that did not fill in the Match. Unfilled programs were overall content with the quality of applicants in the SOAP. Programs expressed varying opinions on why fewer students are choosing EM. While most agreed there are concerns about the workforce (78.1%), even more spread exists on what actions should be taken to help support the future of residency training in EM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Here we present data regarding the 2023 Match environment for EM and describe a residency program-level needs assessment and desire for action. Annual review of the Match data and residency program needs should be continued until we see improvement in the Match environment for EM.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"233-240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 2023 National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) Match in emergency medicine (EM) left 554 spots and 132 EM programs unfilled. The Council of Residency Directors Match Task Force sought to characterize the programs that did and did not fill, learn more about their Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP) applicants, determine residency programs' needs for future NRMP Matches, and inquire what actions program leaders would like to see to promote a healthy future for training in EM.

Methods: We conducted a web-based survey of EM residency program leadership during March and April 2023. We generated descriptive statistics from these survey results. Thematic analysis was used for free-text responses.

Results: Of 287 programs, 160 (55.7%) responded to the survey, including 59 of 132 programs (44.7%) that did not fill in the Match. Unfilled programs were overall content with the quality of applicants in the SOAP. Programs expressed varying opinions on why fewer students are choosing EM. While most agreed there are concerns about the workforce (78.1%), even more spread exists on what actions should be taken to help support the future of residency training in EM.

Conclusion: Here we present data regarding the 2023 Match environment for EM and describe a residency program-level needs assessment and desire for action. Annual review of the Match data and residency program needs should be continued until we see improvement in the Match environment for EM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监测不断变化的急救医学匹配环境[j]。
简介:2023年急诊医学(EM)国家住院医师匹配计划(NRMP)匹配留下了554个职位和132个EM项目空缺。住院医师主任委员会匹配工作小组试图描述有和没有填补的项目,了解更多关于他们的补充Offer和接受计划(SOAP)申请人的信息,确定未来NRMP匹配的住院医师项目需求,并询问项目负责人希望看到什么行动来促进EM培训的健康未来。方法:我们在2023年3月和4月期间对EM住院医师项目领导进行了基于网络的调查。我们从这些调查结果中产生描述性统计数据。主题分析用于自由文本回复。结果:287个项目中,有160个(55.7%)回应了调查,其中132个项目中有59个(44.7%)没有填写匹配项。未填写的项目总体上满足于SOAP中申请人的质量。关于为什么越来越少的学生选择EM,项目表达了不同的意见。虽然大多数人同意对劳动力的担忧(78.1%),但在应该采取哪些行动来帮助支持EM住院医师培训的未来方面存在更多的分歧。结论:在这里,我们提供了关于EM 2023年比赛环境的数据,并描述了住院医师项目层面的需求评估和行动愿望。应该继续对匹配数据和住院医师计划需求进行年度审查,直到我们看到EM匹配环境的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
期刊最新文献
A Qualitative Study of Senior Residents' Strategies to Prepare for Unsupervised Practice. A Taste of Our Own Medicine: Fostering Empathy in Medical Learners Through Patient Simulation. Trends in Proportion of Delirium Among Older Emergency Department Patients in South Korea, 2017-2022. Comparison of Emergency Physicians' and Hospitalists' Attitudes Toward Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Anticoagulation Treatment in Patients with Septic Thrombophlebitis of the Internal Jugular Vein.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1