[Overview of practices among French clinical pathologists specialized in haemostasis].

Andréas Perrier-Cornet, Nicolas Gendron, Céline Desconclois, Virginie Planche, Caroline Vayne, Fabienne Nedelec Gac, Cécile Lavenu-Bombled, Dominique Lasne, Claire Flaujac, Myriam Hormi
{"title":"[Overview of practices among French clinical pathologists specialized in haemostasis].","authors":"Andréas Perrier-Cornet, Nicolas Gendron, Céline Desconclois, Virginie Planche, Caroline Vayne, Fabienne Nedelec Gac, Cécile Lavenu-Bombled, Dominique Lasne, Claire Flaujac, Myriam Hormi","doi":"10.1684/abc.2025.1959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical biology is a medical specialty shared by medical doctor (MD) and pharmacists (PharmD), and Hemostasis is one of its disciplines. Since 2007, physicians have lost interest in medical biology. In haemostasis, the regulatory heterogeneity of status between medical biologists/MDs and medical biologists/PharmDs in a strained health system raises two major issues: (i) with demographic change, optimal patient care may no longer be guaranteed, (ii) medical biologists/PharmDs are sometimes forced to go beyond the scope of their regulatory field of practice. We conducted a survey in 2022 to examine hemostasis advice and consultation practices: 152 professionals responded, including 99 pharmacist-biologists (65.1%), 42 physician-biologists (27.6%) and 11 clinicians (7.2%). Of the practitioners questioned, 91.9% gave diagnostic advice and 75.0% therapeutic advice. 41% of respondents carried out haemostasis consultations, including 24.2% of pharmacists. Our survey reveals a little-known role for medical biologists specialized in haemostasis, particularly pharmacists, and calls for a global reflection on a possible regulated and supervised evolution of their field of practice, to enable them to pursue their mission in complete safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":93870,"journal":{"name":"Annales de biologie clinique","volume":"83 2","pages":"147-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de biologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2025.1959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical biology is a medical specialty shared by medical doctor (MD) and pharmacists (PharmD), and Hemostasis is one of its disciplines. Since 2007, physicians have lost interest in medical biology. In haemostasis, the regulatory heterogeneity of status between medical biologists/MDs and medical biologists/PharmDs in a strained health system raises two major issues: (i) with demographic change, optimal patient care may no longer be guaranteed, (ii) medical biologists/PharmDs are sometimes forced to go beyond the scope of their regulatory field of practice. We conducted a survey in 2022 to examine hemostasis advice and consultation practices: 152 professionals responded, including 99 pharmacist-biologists (65.1%), 42 physician-biologists (27.6%) and 11 clinicians (7.2%). Of the practitioners questioned, 91.9% gave diagnostic advice and 75.0% therapeutic advice. 41% of respondents carried out haemostasis consultations, including 24.2% of pharmacists. Our survey reveals a little-known role for medical biologists specialized in haemostasis, particularly pharmacists, and calls for a global reflection on a possible regulated and supervised evolution of their field of practice, to enable them to pursue their mission in complete safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[法国临床病理学家在止血方面的实践综述]。
医学生物学是医学博士(MD)和药剂师(PharmD)共同的医学专业,止血是其学科之一。自2007年以来,医生对医学生物学失去了兴趣。在止血方面,在紧张的卫生系统中,医学生物学家/医学博士和医学生物学家/药学博士之间的监管异质性提出了两个主要问题:(i)随着人口结构的变化,可能不再保证最佳的患者护理;(ii)医学生物学家/药学博士有时被迫超出其监管领域的范围。我们在2022年进行了一项调查,以检查止血建议和咨询实践:152名专业人员回应,其中包括99名药剂师生物学家(65.1%),42名内科生物学家(27.6%)和11名临床医生(7.2%)。在接受调查的从业员中,91.9%给出诊断建议,75.0%给出治疗建议。41%的应答者进行过止血咨询,其中24.2%为药剂师。我们的调查揭示了专门从事止血的医学生物学家,特别是药剂师的鲜为人知的作用,并呼吁全球反思他们的实践领域可能受到监管和监督的演变,使他们能够完全安全地履行他们的使命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation: comprehensive insights and clinical implications. [Mycological diagnosis of superficial fungal infections: French ANOFEL/LABAC recommendations]. [Learning Lab: A new online learning tool in French for biologists and laboratory staff]. Clot Waveform Analysis: a potential tool in venous thrombosis assessment? [Critical reflections on the article "Overview of practices among French clinical pathologists specialized in haemostasis" published by Dr. Perriet-Cornet and colleagues].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1