Regional innovation and economic growth: Empirical insights from FGLS, FE-DKSE, and XGBoost-SHAP approach

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100524
Sangjae Pyo , Sang Ok Choi
{"title":"Regional innovation and economic growth: Empirical insights from FGLS, FE-DKSE, and XGBoost-SHAP approach","authors":"Sangjae Pyo ,&nbsp;Sang Ok Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of regional innovation factors and their dynamic interactions on regional economic growth. Using a 10-year panel dataset from 17 provinces and cities in South Korea, we analyze the data using panel data regression and explore non-linear relationships with the XGBoost model. We also enhance the model's interpretability by analyzing the impact of the variables on the predictions through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis. In the FGLS analysis, the number of innovative regional firms positively impacted GRDP, suggesting innovative firms boost regional economic output, but had minimal effect on Per Capita Gross Value Added (PCGVA). The proportion of top universities showed no significant impact on GRDP or PCGVA, though XGBoost and SHAP analyses indicated a complex, negative relationship with PCGVA. The interaction between the proportion of top universities and the number of innovative regional firms positively affected GRDP, emphasizing universities' role in supporting innovative firms. The effect of government R&amp;D investment support on PCGVA highlights the importance of appropriate levels of support for maximizing productivity. The results indicate that R&amp;D investment and open innovation significantly influence regional economic growth, with their effects exhibiting non-linear relationships. High-tech and medium-tech industries drive regional economic growth, while low-tech sectors have a negative impact on growth and per capita value-added. This study offers policy implications for fostering regional economic development as well as insights into the intricate links between economic growth and regional innovation factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 2","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of regional innovation factors and their dynamic interactions on regional economic growth. Using a 10-year panel dataset from 17 provinces and cities in South Korea, we analyze the data using panel data regression and explore non-linear relationships with the XGBoost model. We also enhance the model's interpretability by analyzing the impact of the variables on the predictions through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis. In the FGLS analysis, the number of innovative regional firms positively impacted GRDP, suggesting innovative firms boost regional economic output, but had minimal effect on Per Capita Gross Value Added (PCGVA). The proportion of top universities showed no significant impact on GRDP or PCGVA, though XGBoost and SHAP analyses indicated a complex, negative relationship with PCGVA. The interaction between the proportion of top universities and the number of innovative regional firms positively affected GRDP, emphasizing universities' role in supporting innovative firms. The effect of government R&D investment support on PCGVA highlights the importance of appropriate levels of support for maximizing productivity. The results indicate that R&D investment and open innovation significantly influence regional economic growth, with their effects exhibiting non-linear relationships. High-tech and medium-tech industries drive regional economic growth, while low-tech sectors have a negative impact on growth and per capita value-added. This study offers policy implications for fostering regional economic development as well as insights into the intricate links between economic growth and regional innovation factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域创新与经济增长:来自FGLS、FE-DKSE和XGBoost-SHAP方法的实证见解
本研究考察了区域创新要素及其动态交互作用对区域经济增长的影响。本文利用韩国17个省市的10年面板数据,采用面板数据回归方法对数据进行分析,并利用XGBoost模型探讨其非线性关系。通过Shapley加性解释(SHAP)分析变量对预测结果的影响,增强了模型的可解释性。在FGLS分析中,创新型区域企业数量正向影响GRDP,表明创新型企业促进了区域经济产出,但对人均总增加值(PCGVA)的影响很小。尽管XGBoost和SHAP分析表明,顶尖大学比例与PCGVA呈复杂的负相关关系,但对GRDP和PCGVA没有显著影响。顶尖大学比例与创新型区域企业数量之间的交互作用正向影响GRDP,强调了大学对创新型企业的支持作用。政府研发投资支持对PCGVA的影响凸显了适当水平的支持对生产力最大化的重要性。研究结果表明,研发投入和开放式创新对区域经济增长具有显著影响,且二者的影响呈非线性关系。高技术产业和中技术产业对区域经济增长具有拉动作用,而低技术产业对区域经济增长和人均增加值具有负面影响。本研究为促进区域经济发展提供了政策启示,同时也揭示了经济增长与区域创新因素之间的复杂联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
期刊最新文献
Integrating clean mobility with renewable energy: Techno-economic and environmental feasibility of on-grid hybrid photovoltaic–biogas systems Beyond influencers: Leveraging large language models for dynamic content generation and citizen interaction in environmental campaigns Impact of sustainability uncertainty on the volatility dynamics of digital asset class Reconfiguring Indonesia’s travel ecosystem through the Hybrid STA–CBTA Model: A pathway to inclusive innovation in Tourism 4.0 Validating a scale to measure social innovation capacity in social organizations: An empirical contribution to open innovation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1