Efficient detection of corn straw coverage in complex agricultural scenarios

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2025.110338
Feiyun Wang , Chengxu Lv , Hanlu Jiang , Yuxuan Pan , Pengfei Guo , Fupeng Li , Liming Zhou
{"title":"Efficient detection of corn straw coverage in complex agricultural scenarios","authors":"Feiyun Wang ,&nbsp;Chengxu Lv ,&nbsp;Hanlu Jiang ,&nbsp;Yuxuan Pan ,&nbsp;Pengfei Guo ,&nbsp;Fupeng Li ,&nbsp;Liming Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Straw coverage serves as a critical indicator in the realm of conservation tillage. This study aims to fulfill the detection needs for straw coverage on edge monitoring platforms by initially capturing straw images through an onboard terminal and subsequently creating a dataset via data augmentation. We opted for SegNext as the foundational model and incorporated ResNet101 as the backbone to enhance the extraction of features specific to straw. To achieve a lightweight model without sacrificing detection accuracy, ResNet101 was utilized as the teacher model to mentor ResNet18 as the student model, with the training outcomes quantified using QAT. In tests conducted under multifactorial field scenarios, the QSR101-18 model achieved mIoU of 85.78 %, mAP of 95.98 % and Kappa of 86.25 %, surpassing SegNext by 1.44 %, 1.57 % and 1.32 %, respectively. The QSR101-18 model FLOPs and Params are 0.71G and 0.45 M respectively, which is about 1/27 and 1/100 of SegNext. When deployed on edge platforms and analyzed across varying straw coverage rates, QSR101-18 demonstrated an overall error of only 1.3 %, well within acceptable limits. The inference speed for a single image was just 16.32 ms, meeting the speed requirements for field operations. Consequently, the proposed QSR101-18 model demonstrates several key advantages, including a lightweight architecture, minimal error rates, robustness, and high accuracy. It effectively addresses the challenges posed by unstructured, fragmented straw and various environmental factors in detecting straw coverage, all while adhering to the speed constraints required for field operations on edge monitoring platforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 110338"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925004442","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Straw coverage serves as a critical indicator in the realm of conservation tillage. This study aims to fulfill the detection needs for straw coverage on edge monitoring platforms by initially capturing straw images through an onboard terminal and subsequently creating a dataset via data augmentation. We opted for SegNext as the foundational model and incorporated ResNet101 as the backbone to enhance the extraction of features specific to straw. To achieve a lightweight model without sacrificing detection accuracy, ResNet101 was utilized as the teacher model to mentor ResNet18 as the student model, with the training outcomes quantified using QAT. In tests conducted under multifactorial field scenarios, the QSR101-18 model achieved mIoU of 85.78 %, mAP of 95.98 % and Kappa of 86.25 %, surpassing SegNext by 1.44 %, 1.57 % and 1.32 %, respectively. The QSR101-18 model FLOPs and Params are 0.71G and 0.45 M respectively, which is about 1/27 and 1/100 of SegNext. When deployed on edge platforms and analyzed across varying straw coverage rates, QSR101-18 demonstrated an overall error of only 1.3 %, well within acceptable limits. The inference speed for a single image was just 16.32 ms, meeting the speed requirements for field operations. Consequently, the proposed QSR101-18 model demonstrates several key advantages, including a lightweight architecture, minimal error rates, robustness, and high accuracy. It effectively addresses the challenges posed by unstructured, fragmented straw and various environmental factors in detecting straw coverage, all while adhering to the speed constraints required for field operations on edge monitoring platforms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂农业情景下玉米秸秆覆盖度的高效检测
秸秆盖度是保护性耕作的一个重要指标。本研究旨在通过机载终端初步捕获秸秆图像,然后通过数据增强创建数据集,满足边缘监测平台对秸秆覆盖的检测需求。我们选择SegNext作为基础模型,并将ResNet101作为主干来增强对秸秆特征的提取。为了在不牺牲检测精度的情况下实现轻量级模型,我们使用ResNet101作为教师模型来指导ResNet18作为学生模型,并使用QAT对训练结果进行量化。在多因子现场场景下进行的测试中,QSR101-18模型的mIoU为85.78%,mAP为95.98%,Kappa为86.25%,分别超过SegNext 1.44%, 1.57%和1.32%。QSR101-18型号的FLOPs和Params分别为0.71G和0.45 M,约为SegNext的1/27和1/100。当部署在边缘平台上并分析不同秸秆覆盖率时,QSR101-18的总体误差仅为1.3%,完全在可接受的范围内。单幅图像的推理速度仅为16.32 ms,满足现场操作的速度要求。因此,提出的QSR101-18模型展示了几个关键优势,包括轻量级架构、最小错误率、鲁棒性和高准确性。它有效地解决了非结构化、碎片化秸秆和各种环境因素在检测秸秆覆盖时所带来的挑战,同时坚持在边缘监测平台上进行现场操作所需的速度限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
期刊最新文献
An end-to-end video-based action recognition pipeline for precision monitoring and success scoring of broiler breeder mating behavior ChatCEA: a knowledge-driven intelligent service agent for controlled environment agriculture A spectral synergy correction model: Optimizing satellite spectra for improved soil organic carbon monitoring A deep ensemble learning framework for precision image-level weed classification in paddy fields CFD-DEM-based design of UAV precision seeding device and rice seed trajectory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1