Assessment of satellite-based rainfall products for drought monitoring in the Siak Watershed, Indonesia

Q2 Environmental Science Environmental Challenges Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.envc.2025.101134
Mashuri , Karlina , Joko Sujono
{"title":"Assessment of satellite-based rainfall products for drought monitoring in the Siak Watershed, Indonesia","authors":"Mashuri ,&nbsp;Karlina ,&nbsp;Joko Sujono","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Satellite-based rainfall products (SRPs) provide critical precipitation data, particularly in regions with limited or absent rainfall measurement stations. The accuracy of these products necessitates rigorous validation against observed rainfall data. This study evaluates four SRPs—CHIRPS, GPM IMERG F, PERSIANN CCS CDR, and GSMaP—in the Siak Watershed, Riau Province, Indonesia, and investigates their utility in drought monitoring. Bias correction methods, including Modified Linear Correction (MLC), Distribution Mapping (DM), and Modified Linear Correction – Rainfall Intensity Characteristics (MLC-RIC), were applied during calibration and validation phases to enhance SRP accuracy. Validation was performed using data from four rainfall measurement stations spanning 2003 to 2020, with the best-performing SRPs identified through a ranking system based on 34 test parameters at daily, monthly, and annual time scales. The findings indicate that the MLC-RIC method, which introduces six correction factors based on rainfall intensity characteristics, outperforms other bias correction approaches. Among the SRPs, GSMaP demonstrated superior accuracy at daily and annual time scales, while GPM IMERG F excelled in capturing monthly rainfall patterns. Overall, GSMaP emerged as the most reliable product for rainfall estimation and drought monitoring, with GPM IMERG F and PERSIANN CCS CDR ranking second and third, respectively. These results were consistent across pre- and post-correction analyses. Beyond drought analysis, GSMaP shows potential for applications in hydrology, flood forecasting, and meteorology, underscoring its versatility in representing observed rainfall patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Satellite-based rainfall products (SRPs) provide critical precipitation data, particularly in regions with limited or absent rainfall measurement stations. The accuracy of these products necessitates rigorous validation against observed rainfall data. This study evaluates four SRPs—CHIRPS, GPM IMERG F, PERSIANN CCS CDR, and GSMaP—in the Siak Watershed, Riau Province, Indonesia, and investigates their utility in drought monitoring. Bias correction methods, including Modified Linear Correction (MLC), Distribution Mapping (DM), and Modified Linear Correction – Rainfall Intensity Characteristics (MLC-RIC), were applied during calibration and validation phases to enhance SRP accuracy. Validation was performed using data from four rainfall measurement stations spanning 2003 to 2020, with the best-performing SRPs identified through a ranking system based on 34 test parameters at daily, monthly, and annual time scales. The findings indicate that the MLC-RIC method, which introduces six correction factors based on rainfall intensity characteristics, outperforms other bias correction approaches. Among the SRPs, GSMaP demonstrated superior accuracy at daily and annual time scales, while GPM IMERG F excelled in capturing monthly rainfall patterns. Overall, GSMaP emerged as the most reliable product for rainfall estimation and drought monitoring, with GPM IMERG F and PERSIANN CCS CDR ranking second and third, respectively. These results were consistent across pre- and post-correction analyses. Beyond drought analysis, GSMaP shows potential for applications in hydrology, flood forecasting, and meteorology, underscoring its versatility in representing observed rainfall patterns.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚Siak流域干旱监测卫星降雨产品评估
基于卫星的降雨产品(SRPs)提供了关键的降水数据,特别是在雨量测量站有限或没有的地区。这些产品的准确性需要对观测到的降雨数据进行严格的验证。本研究评估了印度尼西亚廖内省Siak流域的四种SRPs-CHIRPS、GPM IMERG F、persann CCS CDR和gsmap,并调查了它们在干旱监测中的效用。偏差校正方法包括修正线性校正(MLC)、分布映射(DM)和修正线性校正-降雨强度特征(MLC- ric),在校准和验证阶段提高SRP精度。使用2003年至2020年四个降雨测量站的数据进行验证,通过基于34个测试参数在日、月和年时间尺度上的排名系统确定了表现最佳的srp。结果表明,基于降雨强度特征引入6个校正因子的MLC-RIC方法优于其他偏差校正方法。在SRPs中,GSMaP在日和年时间尺度上表现出较好的准确性,而GPM IMERG F在捕获月降水模式方面表现出较好的准确性。总体而言,GSMaP是降雨估计和干旱监测最可靠的产品,GPM IMERG F和persann CCS CDR分别排名第二和第三。这些结果在校正前后的分析中是一致的。除了干旱分析,GSMaP还显示了在水文学、洪水预报和气象学方面的应用潜力,强调了它在表示观测到的降雨模式方面的多功能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal narratives of peri-urban land use dynamics and its political drivers: A geo-spatial mixed methods approach Integration of spectral indices and precipitation data to assess river morphometric features in a tropical semi-humid environment Riparian zone transformation in South Africa: Evaluating changes, causes, and the role of legal frameworks Reduction of CO2 emission and energy use during cleaning of milk deposits using ultra-smooth stainless tubing Developing marginal abatement cost curves for peatland restoration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1