Transport poverty vulnerability index: Making use of standardised databases

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104041
Kaja Primc , Darja Zabavnik , Renata Slabe-Erker , Miha Dominko
{"title":"Transport poverty vulnerability index: Making use of standardised databases","authors":"Kaja Primc ,&nbsp;Darja Zabavnik ,&nbsp;Renata Slabe-Erker ,&nbsp;Miha Dominko","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite its importance for socio-economic equity and urban planning, transport poverty is a complex issue that lacks clear measurement tools. The paper seeks to bridge this gap by introducing a composite indicator to assess transport poverty vulnerability in the European Union. The newly constructed vulnerability index for transport poverty, which includes direct and indirect dimensions of affordability, accessibility and mobility from Eurostat and the World Bank, identifies EU-27 countries facing the greatest challenges. Further, the new index is compared with an augmented index that adjusts for externalities such as environmental impacts and demographic factors, providing a more nuanced analysis. The findings reveal a shift in the ranking of countries when the augmented index is considered. While Slovenia, Luxembourg and Austria initially ranked highest (indicating lower transport poverty vulnerability), with the augmented index Denmark, the Netherlands, Czech Republic and Germany emerge as the least transport vulnerable countries. The augmented index generally indicates that countries which invest heavily in transport infrastructure and maintain a balance between annual earnings and transport costs exhibit the least transport poverty vulnerability. Notably, approximately 90 to 125 million people in the EU-27 experience some form of transport poverty, driving the need for targeted policy interventions to address this pervasive issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104041"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its importance for socio-economic equity and urban planning, transport poverty is a complex issue that lacks clear measurement tools. The paper seeks to bridge this gap by introducing a composite indicator to assess transport poverty vulnerability in the European Union. The newly constructed vulnerability index for transport poverty, which includes direct and indirect dimensions of affordability, accessibility and mobility from Eurostat and the World Bank, identifies EU-27 countries facing the greatest challenges. Further, the new index is compared with an augmented index that adjusts for externalities such as environmental impacts and demographic factors, providing a more nuanced analysis. The findings reveal a shift in the ranking of countries when the augmented index is considered. While Slovenia, Luxembourg and Austria initially ranked highest (indicating lower transport poverty vulnerability), with the augmented index Denmark, the Netherlands, Czech Republic and Germany emerge as the least transport vulnerable countries. The augmented index generally indicates that countries which invest heavily in transport infrastructure and maintain a balance between annual earnings and transport costs exhibit the least transport poverty vulnerability. Notably, approximately 90 to 125 million people in the EU-27 experience some form of transport poverty, driving the need for targeted policy interventions to address this pervasive issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交通贫困脆弱性指数:利用标准化数据库
尽管交通贫困对社会经济公平和城市规划很重要,但它是一个复杂的问题,缺乏明确的衡量工具。本文试图通过引入一个综合指标来评估欧洲联盟的交通贫困脆弱性,从而弥合这一差距。欧盟统计局和世界银行新建立的交通贫困脆弱性指数,包括可负担性、可及性和流动性的直接和间接维度,确定了面临最大挑战的欧盟27个国家。此外,还将新指数与根据环境影响和人口因素等外部性进行调整的增强指数进行了比较,从而提供了更细致的分析。研究结果显示,当考虑到增强指数时,各国的排名发生了变化。虽然斯洛文尼亚、卢森堡和奥地利最初排名最高(表明交通贫困脆弱性较低),但根据增强指数,丹麦、荷兰、捷克共和国和德国成为交通脆弱性最低的国家。扩大后的指数一般表明,在运输基础设施方面投入大量资金并在年收入和运输成本之间保持平衡的国家最不容易出现运输贫穷。值得注意的是,在欧盟27国中,大约有9000万至1.25亿人经历着某种形式的交通贫困,因此需要有针对性的政策干预来解决这一普遍存在的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia State versus private ownership: Local government preferences in wind power permitting in China Uncertainties and anticipated disturbances as drivers of tenant relocation in Swedish housing renovation Fission and friction: A systematic review of individual-level determinants of attitudes toward nuclear energy in advanced economies An inevitable future? The debate over mining for critical raw materials on Indigenous Sámi lands—A critical discourse analysis of Swedish news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1