Elucidating uncertainty in bifacial photovoltaic gain estimation

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Solar Energy Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2025.113469
Magnus Moe Nygård , Marie Syre Wiig , Nathan Roosloot , Gaute Otnes , Mari B. Øgaard , Heine Nygard Riise , Erik Stensrud Marstein
{"title":"Elucidating uncertainty in bifacial photovoltaic gain estimation","authors":"Magnus Moe Nygård ,&nbsp;Marie Syre Wiig ,&nbsp;Nathan Roosloot ,&nbsp;Gaute Otnes ,&nbsp;Mari B. Øgaard ,&nbsp;Heine Nygard Riise ,&nbsp;Erik Stensrud Marstein","doi":"10.1016/j.solener.2025.113469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The bifacial gain of fielded bifacial photovoltaic (PV) systems is commonly estimated by comparing the energy yield of the system with that of a monofacial reference. However, this approach is dependent on the selected reference, and can thus be associated with significant uncertainty, since the two technologies might have very different properties. This study investigates the significance of such differences when the bifacial gain is estimated from energy yield time series data. A series of corrections are applied to account for differences in installed capacity and responses with respect to temperature and irradiance. The analysis is carried out using data collected over two years from a 22.6 kW<sub>p</sub> ground-mounted fixed-tilt PV system in Norway using four different monofacial technologies as reference systems that all rely on Si as the active material but have different cell architectures. With no corrections applied, the estimated bifacial gain with the monofacial technology that most closely resembles the bifacial is determined to 12.6 % for the two-year period considered. The estimate increases to 13.1 % when correcting for irradiance and 14.4 % when also correcting for temperature. The results demonstrate that the applied corrections reduces the range between the smallest and largest estimate of the bifacial gain from 6.3 to 3.5 percentage points. Although it is possible that the range can be reduced further if differences in spectral response and degradation are accounted for, it should also be expected that some of the remaining variation reflects the measurement uncertainty inherent to this method of estimating the bifacial gain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":428,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 113469"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X25002324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bifacial gain of fielded bifacial photovoltaic (PV) systems is commonly estimated by comparing the energy yield of the system with that of a monofacial reference. However, this approach is dependent on the selected reference, and can thus be associated with significant uncertainty, since the two technologies might have very different properties. This study investigates the significance of such differences when the bifacial gain is estimated from energy yield time series data. A series of corrections are applied to account for differences in installed capacity and responses with respect to temperature and irradiance. The analysis is carried out using data collected over two years from a 22.6 kWp ground-mounted fixed-tilt PV system in Norway using four different monofacial technologies as reference systems that all rely on Si as the active material but have different cell architectures. With no corrections applied, the estimated bifacial gain with the monofacial technology that most closely resembles the bifacial is determined to 12.6 % for the two-year period considered. The estimate increases to 13.1 % when correcting for irradiance and 14.4 % when also correcting for temperature. The results demonstrate that the applied corrections reduces the range between the smallest and largest estimate of the bifacial gain from 6.3 to 3.5 percentage points. Although it is possible that the range can be reduced further if differences in spectral response and degradation are accounted for, it should also be expected that some of the remaining variation reflects the measurement uncertainty inherent to this method of estimating the bifacial gain.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双面光伏增益估计中的不确定性
野外双面光伏(PV)系统的双面增益通常是通过比较系统的发电量与单面参考的发电量来估计的。然而,这种方法依赖于所选择的参考,因此可能与显著的不确定性相关联,因为这两种技术可能具有非常不同的特性。本研究探讨了从产能时间序列数据估计双面增益时这种差异的意义。应用了一系列校正,以说明安装容量和对温度和辐照度的响应的差异。该分析使用了从挪威22.6 kWp地面固定倾斜光伏系统收集的数据,该系统使用了四种不同的单面技术作为参考系统,这些系统都依赖于Si作为活性材料,但具有不同的电池结构。在不进行校正的情况下,与双面最接近的单面技术的估计双面增益在考虑的两年期间确定为12.6%。当校正辐照度时,估计值增加到13.1%,同时校正温度时,估计值增加到14.4%。结果表明,所施加的修正使双面增益的最小和最大估计值之间的范围从6.3个百分点减小到3.5个百分点。虽然如果考虑到光谱响应和退化的差异,范围可能会进一步缩小,但也应该预期,一些剩余的变化反映了这种估计双面增益的方法固有的测量不确定度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Solar Energy
Solar Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
9.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Solar Energy welcomes manuscripts presenting information not previously published in journals on any aspect of solar energy research, development, application, measurement or policy. The term "solar energy" in this context includes the indirect uses such as wind energy and biomass
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mirror density optimization of solar tower system considering optical and receiver parameters Performance analysis and optimization of a spectral beam splitting photovoltaic thermal system A robust rule-based method for detecting and classifying underperformance in photovoltaic systems using inverter data Technology readiness level assessment of solar PV cleaning technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1