Environmental DNA surveys can determine in-stream dominance of non-native brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis over native brown trout Salmo trutta

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113407
Andreas Broman , William F. Englund , Niclas Gyllenstrand , Joacim Näslund
{"title":"Environmental DNA surveys can determine in-stream dominance of non-native brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis over native brown trout Salmo trutta","authors":"Andreas Broman ,&nbsp;William F. Englund ,&nbsp;Niclas Gyllenstrand ,&nbsp;Joacim Näslund","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For effective management of established potentially invasive species it is important to find management target sites (e.g. for depletion or eradication measures). In Sweden, the brook charr is non-native and competes with the native brown trout. Hence, finding methods allowing for rapid screening for potential problem areas is important. Wading electrofishing is the main method used, but eDNA surveys have the potential to replace the former method. Here we evaluate the usage of quantitative single-species eDNA analyses to find sites where brook charr dominates over brown trout. Using the ratio of the estimated relative amount of eDNA for each species, we correctly detect the vast majority of the areas where brook charr is dominating brown trout in the electrofishing results (&gt; 50 % of total abundance or biomass). Surveys using eDNA also have a higher chance to detect brook charr than electrofishing. We also show that quantitative comparisons between eDNA and electrofishing can be interpreted in very different ways depending on handling of outliers and inclusion/exclusion of sites without either catch or eDNA detections of a species in the analyses. Overall, however, even if relationships between catch results and eDNA results are found to be significantly positive under certain assumptions, the ability of eDNA results to predict electrofishing catches at the site level is associated with substantial uncertainties, at the scale of an order of magnitude. No environmental factors were found to clearly affect eDNA concentrations. In conclusion, eDNA is a promising tool to be used for cost-efficient screening of streams where brook charr is a potential ecological problem, but electrofishing still has a strong methodological position for follow-up studies quantifying their actual abundance. The two methods are complementary and one should not completely replace the other.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113407"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For effective management of established potentially invasive species it is important to find management target sites (e.g. for depletion or eradication measures). In Sweden, the brook charr is non-native and competes with the native brown trout. Hence, finding methods allowing for rapid screening for potential problem areas is important. Wading electrofishing is the main method used, but eDNA surveys have the potential to replace the former method. Here we evaluate the usage of quantitative single-species eDNA analyses to find sites where brook charr dominates over brown trout. Using the ratio of the estimated relative amount of eDNA for each species, we correctly detect the vast majority of the areas where brook charr is dominating brown trout in the electrofishing results (> 50 % of total abundance or biomass). Surveys using eDNA also have a higher chance to detect brook charr than electrofishing. We also show that quantitative comparisons between eDNA and electrofishing can be interpreted in very different ways depending on handling of outliers and inclusion/exclusion of sites without either catch or eDNA detections of a species in the analyses. Overall, however, even if relationships between catch results and eDNA results are found to be significantly positive under certain assumptions, the ability of eDNA results to predict electrofishing catches at the site level is associated with substantial uncertainties, at the scale of an order of magnitude. No environmental factors were found to clearly affect eDNA concentrations. In conclusion, eDNA is a promising tool to be used for cost-efficient screening of streams where brook charr is a potential ecological problem, but electrofishing still has a strong methodological position for follow-up studies quantifying their actual abundance. The two methods are complementary and one should not completely replace the other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境DNA调查可以确定非本地小溪鲑(Salvelinus fontinalis)对本地褐鳟(Salmo trutta)的溪流优势
为了有效管理已确定的潜在入侵物种,重要的是找到管理目标点(例如枯竭或根除措施)。在瑞典,河鲑是外来物种,与当地的褐鳟竞争。因此,寻找能够快速筛选潜在问题区域的方法是很重要的。涉水电钓是常用的主要方法,但eDNA调查有可能取代以前的方法。在这里,我们评估了定量单种eDNA分析的使用,以找到小溪鲑比褐鳟占优势的位点。利用每个物种估计的eDNA相对量的比例,我们正确地检测到绝大多数区域,其中小溪炭在电钓结果中占主导地位(>;总丰度或生物量的50%)。使用eDNA的调查也比电钓有更高的机会检测到小溪的木炭。我们还表明,eDNA和电钓之间的定量比较可以以非常不同的方式解释,这取决于对异常值的处理以及在分析中包含/排除没有捕获或没有eDNA检测的位点。然而,总体而言,即使在某些假设下发现捕捞结果和eDNA结果之间的关系显着正相关,eDNA结果预测现场水平电捕捞渔获量的能力在数量级上存在很大的不确定性。没有发现环境因素明显影响eDNA浓度。综上所述,eDNA是一种很有前景的工具,可用于低成本高效地筛选有潜在生态问题的溪流,但电钓在量化其实际丰度的后续研究中仍具有很强的方法学地位。这两种方法是互补的,不应该完全取代另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
The median survival time of motifs: A novel motif-based indicator reveals the impact of algal blooms on bacterial network interaction stability Disentangling the contributions of hydrothermal factors to fractional vegetation cover dynamics on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau Quantifying the effects of urban agglomeration on cropland ecological efficiency in the Sichuan–Chongqing region, China Thermodynamic Refugia in the Arabian peninsula: the diurnal moisture pulse as a physical Indicator of desert habitability Taxonomic and trait-based approaches for monitoring fine sediment: influence of sediment method, substrate composition, taxonomic resolution and spatial scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1