Teza Mwamulima, Lauren T. Bennett, Patrick N.J. Lane, Gary J. Sheridan
{"title":"Quantifying forest structure effects on microclimate buffering across a climatic gradient in temperate Australia","authors":"Teza Mwamulima, Lauren T. Bennett, Patrick N.J. Lane, Gary J. Sheridan","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest structure, through its three-dimensional arrangement of foliage and wood, moderates the climate, creating a microclimate that is more stable than the climate outside the forest in a process known as microclimate buffering. This study aimed to improve understanding of the relationship between forest structure and microclimate buffering of daily maximum temperature (T<sub>max.</sub>) and vapour pressure deficit (VPD<sub>max.</sub>) in temperate evergreen forests. Forest structure assessments and microclimate monitoring across eight sites in temperate Australia revealed significant variation in microclimate buffering, primarily driven by canopy closure, leaf area index (LAI), and tree stem density (≥10-cm diameter). Compared to open sites, closed forests (>70 % canopy cover) reduced mean T<sub>max</sub>. by 1.8 ± 0.08°C to 4.1 ± 0.09°C, and open forests (30–70 % canopy cover) by 0.2 ± 0.08°C to 0.4 ± 0.06°C. Only closed forests reduced mean VPD<sub>max</sub>., by 0.15 ± 0.01 kPa to 0.43 ± 0.02 kPa, while mean VPD<sub>max.</sub> in open forests and woodlands was 0.04 ± 0.01 kPa to 0.38 ± 0.02 kPa higher than open sites respectively, indicating net drying. Across the forest structure gradient, canopy closure, LAI and stem density had significant negative relationships with microclimate offsets of daily T<sub>max.</sub> and VPD<sub>max.</sub> Over the assessed forest structure range, T<sub>max.</sub> offsets were negative (buffering) above 35 % canopy closure, 137 stems ha<sup>−1</sup>, and LAI 0.36, while VPD<sub>max.</sub> offsets were negative above 59 % canopy closure, 485 stems ha<sup>−1</sup>, and LAI 0.82. These findings emphasize the role of forest structure in microclimate buffering and potential climate resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"586 ","pages":"Article 122686"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272500194X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forest structure, through its three-dimensional arrangement of foliage and wood, moderates the climate, creating a microclimate that is more stable than the climate outside the forest in a process known as microclimate buffering. This study aimed to improve understanding of the relationship between forest structure and microclimate buffering of daily maximum temperature (Tmax.) and vapour pressure deficit (VPDmax.) in temperate evergreen forests. Forest structure assessments and microclimate monitoring across eight sites in temperate Australia revealed significant variation in microclimate buffering, primarily driven by canopy closure, leaf area index (LAI), and tree stem density (≥10-cm diameter). Compared to open sites, closed forests (>70 % canopy cover) reduced mean Tmax. by 1.8 ± 0.08°C to 4.1 ± 0.09°C, and open forests (30–70 % canopy cover) by 0.2 ± 0.08°C to 0.4 ± 0.06°C. Only closed forests reduced mean VPDmax., by 0.15 ± 0.01 kPa to 0.43 ± 0.02 kPa, while mean VPDmax. in open forests and woodlands was 0.04 ± 0.01 kPa to 0.38 ± 0.02 kPa higher than open sites respectively, indicating net drying. Across the forest structure gradient, canopy closure, LAI and stem density had significant negative relationships with microclimate offsets of daily Tmax. and VPDmax. Over the assessed forest structure range, Tmax. offsets were negative (buffering) above 35 % canopy closure, 137 stems ha−1, and LAI 0.36, while VPDmax. offsets were negative above 59 % canopy closure, 485 stems ha−1, and LAI 0.82. These findings emphasize the role of forest structure in microclimate buffering and potential climate resilience.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.