Influence of Time-Averaging of Climate Data on Estimates of Atmospheric Vapor Pressure Deficit and Inferred Relationships With Wildfire Area in the Western United States

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geophysical Research Letters Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1029/2024GL113708
Qian He, A. Park Williams, Miriam R. Johnston, Caroline S. Juang, Bowen Wang
{"title":"Influence of Time-Averaging of Climate Data on Estimates of Atmospheric Vapor Pressure Deficit and Inferred Relationships With Wildfire Area in the Western United States","authors":"Qian He,&nbsp;A. Park Williams,&nbsp;Miriam R. Johnston,&nbsp;Caroline S. Juang,&nbsp;Bowen Wang","doi":"10.1029/2024GL113708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is a driver of evaporative demand and correlates strongly with wildfire extent in the western United States (WUS). Vapor pressure deficit is the difference between saturation vapor pressure (<i>e</i><sub>s</sub>) and actual vapor pressure (<i>e</i><sub>a</sub>). Because <i>e</i><sub>s</sub> increases nonlinearly with temperature, calculations of time-averaged VPD vary depending on the frequency of temperature measurements and how <i>e</i><sub>a</sub> is calculated, potentially limiting our understanding of fire-climate relationships. We calculate eight versions of monthly VPD across the WUS and assess their differences. Monthly VPDs calculated from daily data are 2%–6% higher, and more accurate, than when calculated from monthly data. Using daily maximum and minimum temperature, instead of mean, increases VPD by ∼20%, but can overestimate true values depending on how <i>e</i><sub>a</sub> is calculated. These differences do not meaningfully impact correlations with annual wildfire area, however, suggesting our understanding of historical fire-VPD relations is not very sensitive to how VPD is calculated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL113708","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL113708","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is a driver of evaporative demand and correlates strongly with wildfire extent in the western United States (WUS). Vapor pressure deficit is the difference between saturation vapor pressure (es) and actual vapor pressure (ea). Because es increases nonlinearly with temperature, calculations of time-averaged VPD vary depending on the frequency of temperature measurements and how ea is calculated, potentially limiting our understanding of fire-climate relationships. We calculate eight versions of monthly VPD across the WUS and assess their differences. Monthly VPDs calculated from daily data are 2%–6% higher, and more accurate, than when calculated from monthly data. Using daily maximum and minimum temperature, instead of mean, increases VPD by ∼20%, but can overestimate true values depending on how ea is calculated. These differences do not meaningfully impact correlations with annual wildfire area, however, suggesting our understanding of historical fire-VPD relations is not very sensitive to how VPD is calculated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候资料时间平均对美国西部大气水汽压亏缺估算的影响及其与野火面积的推断关系
蒸气压差(VPD)是蒸发需求的驱动因素,与美国西部(WUS)的野火范围密切相关。蒸气压差是饱和蒸气压 (es) 与实际蒸气压 (ea) 之间的差值。由于 es 随温度呈非线性增长,因此时间平均 VPD 的计算会因温度测量频率和 ea 的计算方法而有所不同,这可能会限制我们对火灾与气候关系的理解。我们计算了整个 WUS 地区的八个版本的月平均 VPD,并评估了它们之间的差异。根据日数据计算的月 VPD 比根据月数据计算的高 2%-6%,而且更准确。使用日最高气温和日最低气温而不是平均气温会使 VPD 增加 20%,但根据 ea 的计算方法,可能会高估真实值。然而,这些差异并不会对与年度野火面积的相关性产生有意义的影响,这表明我们对历史火灾-VPD 关系的理解对如何计算 VPD 并不十分敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Research Letters
Geophysical Research Letters 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
1588
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.
期刊最新文献
Successes and Failures of Current AI Climate Models Escalating Compound Drought-Heatwaves and Demographic Shifts Threaten Simultaneous Global Breadbasket Failures Impact of Mantle Velocity Uncertainty on Receiver-Function Imaging of the Transition Zone Partial Ruptures, Cascading Multi-Fault Ruptures, and Aftershocks in 2D Random Fault Network Comparative Analysis of Seismicity Across Three Depth-Dependent Slip Regimes in the Japan Trench Subduction Zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1