Precision surgery for endometriosis: preventing chronic pelvic pain in patients with higher pre-operative pain scores and in patients of advanced age

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1007/s00404-025-07996-7
Davit Bokhua, Angela Kather, Anna Kaufmann, Evangelia Polychronaki, Valentina Auletta, Ingo B. Runnebaum
{"title":"Precision surgery for endometriosis: preventing chronic pelvic pain in patients with higher pre-operative pain scores and in patients of advanced age","authors":"Davit Bokhua,&nbsp;Angela Kather,&nbsp;Anna Kaufmann,&nbsp;Evangelia Polychronaki,&nbsp;Valentina Auletta,&nbsp;Ingo B. Runnebaum","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-07996-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Symptom relief can be achieved for many patients with endometriosis by tailored individual treatment. However, therapy resistance is observed in some patients. This study surveyed patient-reported long-term outcomes after laparoscopic endometriosis surgery and evaluated potential pre-operative predictors for insufficient symptom control.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients with complete surgical endometriosis resection treated between 2013–2016 at the Department of Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital. Our 2020 survey gathered socio-demographic, reproductive, symptom-related, and subjective general condition data from 122 patients. Overall pain intensity was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) from zero (no pain) to 100 (highest imaginable pain). Clinical records provided additional information.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Median time between surgery and interview was 6 years. Postoperatively, the proportion of patients reporting symptoms was considerably reduced (menstrual pain 32.0% vs. 85.2%, chronic pelvic pain [CPP] 40.2% vs. 67.2%, dyspareunia 34.4% vs. 59.8%, hypermenorrhea 17.2% vs. 49.2%; p &lt; 0.001). The majority of respondents (70%) reported improved subjective general condition. Mean NRS Score significantly decreased from 77.2 to 26.6 (p &lt; 0.001). Among pre-operatively infertile women, 45.2% reported successful pregnancies. However, 20–30% of patients did not respond to therapy in one of the analyzed domains. Multivariate logistic regression identified CPP as a strong predictor for failure in permanent pain reduction (OR 5.544, 95% CI 1.338–22.965, p = 0.018) and risk for reoperation (OR 5.191, 95% CI 1.100-24.501, p = 0.038). Higher pre-operative NRS scores and increasing age were associated with better long-term pain relief.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with higher pre-operative pain scores and patients of advanced age benefit significantly from precision surgery, experiencing sustained symptom relief and improved subjective general condition. However, younger patients with CPP and moderate pre-operative pain intensity showed a higher risk for therapy resistance and require multimodal treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"311 4","pages":"1111 - 1125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-025-07996-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-025-07996-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Symptom relief can be achieved for many patients with endometriosis by tailored individual treatment. However, therapy resistance is observed in some patients. This study surveyed patient-reported long-term outcomes after laparoscopic endometriosis surgery and evaluated potential pre-operative predictors for insufficient symptom control.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with complete surgical endometriosis resection treated between 2013–2016 at the Department of Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Jena University Hospital. Our 2020 survey gathered socio-demographic, reproductive, symptom-related, and subjective general condition data from 122 patients. Overall pain intensity was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) from zero (no pain) to 100 (highest imaginable pain). Clinical records provided additional information.

Results

Median time between surgery and interview was 6 years. Postoperatively, the proportion of patients reporting symptoms was considerably reduced (menstrual pain 32.0% vs. 85.2%, chronic pelvic pain [CPP] 40.2% vs. 67.2%, dyspareunia 34.4% vs. 59.8%, hypermenorrhea 17.2% vs. 49.2%; p < 0.001). The majority of respondents (70%) reported improved subjective general condition. Mean NRS Score significantly decreased from 77.2 to 26.6 (p < 0.001). Among pre-operatively infertile women, 45.2% reported successful pregnancies. However, 20–30% of patients did not respond to therapy in one of the analyzed domains. Multivariate logistic regression identified CPP as a strong predictor for failure in permanent pain reduction (OR 5.544, 95% CI 1.338–22.965, p = 0.018) and risk for reoperation (OR 5.191, 95% CI 1.100-24.501, p = 0.038). Higher pre-operative NRS scores and increasing age were associated with better long-term pain relief.

Conclusion

Patients with higher pre-operative pain scores and patients of advanced age benefit significantly from precision surgery, experiencing sustained symptom relief and improved subjective general condition. However, younger patients with CPP and moderate pre-operative pain intensity showed a higher risk for therapy resistance and require multimodal treatment strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜异位症的精准手术:预防术前疼痛评分较高和高龄患者的慢性盆腔疼痛
目的:对许多子宫内膜异位症患者进行个体化治疗,可使症状得到缓解。然而,在一些患者中观察到治疗抵抗。本研究调查了腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症手术后患者报告的长期结果,并评估了症状控制不足的潜在术前预测因素。方法:本回顾性研究纳入耶拿大学医院妇科和生殖医学科2013-2016年间接受子宫内膜异位症完全手术切除的患者。我们2020年的调查收集了122名患者的社会人口统计、生殖、症状相关和主观一般状况数据。使用数字评定量表(NRS)评估总体疼痛强度,从0(无疼痛)到100(可想象的最高疼痛)。临床记录提供了额外的信息。结果:手术至面谈的中位时间为6年。术后报告症状的患者比例明显减少(月经疼痛32.0% vs. 85.2%,慢性盆腔疼痛[CPP] 40.2% vs. 67.2%,性交困难34.4% vs. 59.8%,痛经17.2% vs. 49.2%;结论:术前疼痛评分较高的患者和高龄患者从精准手术中获益显著,症状持续缓解,主观一般状况改善。然而,年轻的CPP患者和中等术前疼痛强度显示出更高的治疗抵抗风险,需要多模式治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
Planned mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by late-onset fetal growth restriction: a retrospective cohort study. Predictive value of uterine electromyography coupled with transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment in women at risk of preterm delivery. Unlocking ovarian rejuvenation with platelet-rich plasma: systematic review and proposed clinical framework for Controlled use in poor prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation. Characterization of exceptional responders with long-term PARP inhibitor therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer: an analysis of 23 patients from Charité. Effect of alpha-lipoic acid and myoinositol on endometrial inflammation in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1