Associations Between Prophylactic IV Antibiotics and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Severe Brain Injury Who Require Mechanical Ventilation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006654
Selina Ehrenzeller, Michael Klompas
{"title":"Associations Between Prophylactic IV Antibiotics and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Severe Brain Injury Who Require Mechanical Ventilation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Selina Ehrenzeller, Michael Klompas","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of prophylactic IV antibiotics on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and other outcomes in critically ill patients with acute brain injury.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and other databases without language restrictions from inception to November 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included randomized trials that enrolled patients 16 years old or older with severe acute brain injury (e.g., trauma, stroke, and hypoxia) and compared prophylactic IV antibiotics to placebo or no antibiotics. Studies evaluating oral or gastric antibiotic prophylaxis were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers independently evaluated study characteristics, pneumonia rates, mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, post-admission bacteremia, antibiotic utilization, neurologic outcomes, and adverse events including antibiotic-resistance and Clostridioides difficile infections. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias template. Studies were synthesized using inverse-variance random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses included stratifications by risk-of-bias, Glasgow Coma Scale, antibiotic duration, and mechanism of brain injury.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>We identified seven eligible trials (827 patients). Prophylactic antibiotics were associated with less VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78; I2 = 23%) but not with changes in duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference [MD], -0.45; 95% CI, -1.63 to +0.74), ICU length of stay (MD, -1.76 d; 95% CI, -3.94 to +0.42 d), hospital mortality (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.12), or long-term neurologic outcomes. On stratification by mechanism of injury, antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with significantly less VAP, shorter ICU length of stay, and a trend toward lower mortality in patients with structural but not hypoxic brain injuries. Other sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among critically ill patients with acute brain injury, prophylactic IV antibiotics were associated with less VAP but not with changes in length of stay, mortality, or neurologic outcomes. Patients with structural brain injuries may benefit more than those with hypoxic brain injury but further studies are needed to confirm or refute this possibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1269-e1281"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006654","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of prophylactic IV antibiotics on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and other outcomes in critically ill patients with acute brain injury.

Data sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and other databases without language restrictions from inception to November 1, 2024.

Study selection: We included randomized trials that enrolled patients 16 years old or older with severe acute brain injury (e.g., trauma, stroke, and hypoxia) and compared prophylactic IV antibiotics to placebo or no antibiotics. Studies evaluating oral or gastric antibiotic prophylaxis were excluded.

Data extraction: Two reviewers independently evaluated study characteristics, pneumonia rates, mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, post-admission bacteremia, antibiotic utilization, neurologic outcomes, and adverse events including antibiotic-resistance and Clostridioides difficile infections. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias template. Studies were synthesized using inverse-variance random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses included stratifications by risk-of-bias, Glasgow Coma Scale, antibiotic duration, and mechanism of brain injury.

Data synthesis: We identified seven eligible trials (827 patients). Prophylactic antibiotics were associated with less VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78; I2 = 23%) but not with changes in duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference [MD], -0.45; 95% CI, -1.63 to +0.74), ICU length of stay (MD, -1.76 d; 95% CI, -3.94 to +0.42 d), hospital mortality (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.12), or long-term neurologic outcomes. On stratification by mechanism of injury, antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with significantly less VAP, shorter ICU length of stay, and a trend toward lower mortality in patients with structural but not hypoxic brain injuries. Other sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary findings.

Conclusions: Among critically ill patients with acute brain injury, prophylactic IV antibiotics were associated with less VAP but not with changes in length of stay, mortality, or neurologic outcomes. Patients with structural brain injuries may benefit more than those with hypoxic brain injury but further studies are needed to confirm or refute this possibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要机械通气的急性重型脑损伤患者预防性静脉注射抗生素与预后之间的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:探讨预防性静脉注射抗生素对危重急性脑损伤患者呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)及其他预后的影响。数据来源:我们检索了PubMed, Embase, CINAHL和其他无语言限制的数据库,从成立到2024年11月1日。研究选择:我们纳入了随机试验,纳入了16岁或以上的严重急性脑损伤(如创伤、中风和缺氧)患者,并将预防性静脉注射抗生素与安慰剂或无抗生素进行比较。评估口服或胃用抗生素预防的研究被排除在外。资料提取:两位评论者独立评估了研究特征、肺炎发生率、死亡率、机械通气持续时间、ICU和住院时间、入院后菌血症、抗生素使用、神经系统结局以及包括抗生素耐药性和艰难梭菌感染在内的不良事件。使用Cochrane风险偏倚模板评估质量。研究采用反方差随机效应模型进行综合。敏感性分析包括根据偏倚风险、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、抗生素持续时间和脑损伤机制进行分层。数据综合:我们确定了7项符合条件的试验(827例患者)。预防性抗生素与VAP减少相关(风险比[RR], 0.61;95% ci, 0.47-0.78;I2 = 23%),但与机械通气时间的变化无关(平均差[MD], -0.45;95% CI, -1.63至+0.74),ICU住院时间(MD, -1.76 d;95% CI, -3.94至+0.42 d),医院死亡率(RR, 0.91;95% CI, 0.74-1.12)或长期神经系统预后。在损伤机制分层上,抗生素预防与结构性而非缺氧性脑损伤患者的VAP显著降低、ICU住院时间缩短以及死亡率降低相关。其他敏感性分析与初步发现一致。结论:在急性脑损伤的危重患者中,预防性静脉注射抗生素与VAP减少相关,但与住院时间、死亡率或神经系统预后的变化无关。结构性脑损伤患者可能比缺氧性脑损伤患者受益更多,但需要进一步的研究来证实或反驳这种可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Criteria for the Definition of Refractory Septic Shock: A Joint Delphi Consensus from the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026. Sepsis and Subsequent Psychiatric Morbidity: A Nationwide Population-Based Matched Cohort Study, 2008-2019. Ready for Donation, Not for Death: A Qualitative Study of Families' Experience With Controlled Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death in Intensive Care. Executive Summary: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1