Development and validation of a feasible questionnaire to assess pharmacists' attitudes to documenting and classifying pharmaceutical interventions in hospital settings.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004371
Sara Machado, Fátima Falcão, Afonso Miguel Cavaco
{"title":"Development and validation of a feasible questionnaire to assess pharmacists' attitudes to documenting and classifying pharmaceutical interventions in hospital settings.","authors":"Sara Machado, Fátima Falcão, Afonso Miguel Cavaco","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Significant efforts have been directed towards systematically documenting and classifying pharmacist interventions (PIs), generating relevant data for professionals' practice and improving the quality of patient care and health outcomes. However, the paucity of PI evaluation tools hinders data generation, harmonisation and sensible application.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive questionnaire to assess pharmacists' opinions and practices concerning documenting and classifying PIs in Portuguese hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The tool development underwent face, content, construct validity procedures and scale reliability calculations grounded in the attitudinal framework. An exploration of the instrument dimensionally was accomplished through factor analysis. Face validity, content validity, construct validity and scale reliability were the selected validation parameters.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A 37-item scale was developed comprising an initial sociodemographic section (8 items) and three explanatory attitudinal-based domains: Cognitive (6 items), Behavioural (14 items), and Affective (9 items). The scale showed adequate overall psychometric properties. Within the Affective domain, factor analysis revealed three latent explanatory factors: Process (4 items), Outcome (3 items) and Satisfaction (2 items).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This newly developed tool can contribute to assessing pharmacists' perspectives and routines in documenting and classifying PIs within hospital environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Significant efforts have been directed towards systematically documenting and classifying pharmacist interventions (PIs), generating relevant data for professionals' practice and improving the quality of patient care and health outcomes. However, the paucity of PI evaluation tools hinders data generation, harmonisation and sensible application.

Aim: This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive questionnaire to assess pharmacists' opinions and practices concerning documenting and classifying PIs in Portuguese hospital settings.

Method: The tool development underwent face, content, construct validity procedures and scale reliability calculations grounded in the attitudinal framework. An exploration of the instrument dimensionally was accomplished through factor analysis. Face validity, content validity, construct validity and scale reliability were the selected validation parameters.

Result: A 37-item scale was developed comprising an initial sociodemographic section (8 items) and three explanatory attitudinal-based domains: Cognitive (6 items), Behavioural (14 items), and Affective (9 items). The scale showed adequate overall psychometric properties. Within the Affective domain, factor analysis revealed three latent explanatory factors: Process (4 items), Outcome (3 items) and Satisfaction (2 items).

Conclusion: This newly developed tool can contribute to assessing pharmacists' perspectives and routines in documenting and classifying PIs within hospital environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证一个可行的问卷,以评估药剂师的态度记录和分类药物干预在医院设置。
背景:重要的努力已经针对系统地记录和分类药师干预(pi),为专业人员的实践产生相关数据,提高病人护理和健康结果的质量。然而,缺乏PI评估工具阻碍了数据的生成、协调和合理的应用。目的:本研究旨在开发和验证一个全面的问卷调查,以评估药剂师的意见和做法,有关文件和分类pi在葡萄牙医院设置。方法:以态度框架为基础,对工具开发进行面效度、内容效度、构念效度和量表信度计算。通过因子分析,对仪器的维度进行了探索。选择面效度、内容效度、结构效度和量表效度作为验证参数。结果:开发了一个37项量表,包括初始社会人口学部分(8项)和三个解释态度的领域:认知(6项),行为(14项)和情感(9项)。该量表显示出足够的整体心理测量特性。在情感领域,因子分析揭示了三个潜在的解释因素:过程(4项)、结果(3项)和满意度(2项)。结论:这一新开发的工具有助于评估药师在医院环境中记录和分类pi的观点和惯例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
期刊最新文献
Association of acamprosate versus gabapentinoids with liver disease progression and alcohol-related admissions in patients with alcohol use disorder. Impact of patient-centred care and population health management on diabetes and hypertension outcomes. German Federal Association of Hospital Pharmacists national survey of clinical pharmacy services in Germany, 2024. Drug-drug interactions in adjuvant and neoadjuvant breast cancer therapy. Hospital production of a 1% propofol-cyclodextrin formulation to address drug shortages: a proof of concept.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1