Elevated Power Promotes Prosocial Behavior More Than Elevated Status.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1177/01461672251324678
Britt Hadar, Almog Simchon, Michael Gilead, Pamela K Smith
{"title":"Elevated Power Promotes Prosocial Behavior More Than Elevated Status.","authors":"Britt Hadar, Almog Simchon, Michael Gilead, Pamela K Smith","doi":"10.1177/01461672251324678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Power and status are fundamental elements of social hierarchy, yet their influence on prosocial behavior remains unclear. To distinguish between prosocial and self-serving motives, we focused on behaviors that provide no benefit to the actor's status and may even harm it. We hypothesized that high power increases such behaviors compared to high status. In Studies 1a-2 (<i>N</i> = 824), participants in high-power roles were more likely to prevent harm or provide help at the expense of their reputation compared to those in high-status roles (Studies 1a-2), and those in low-power or low-status roles (Study 1a). In Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 150), greater perceived power was linked to increased anonymous resource allocation in a dictator game, while greater perceived status was linked to decreased allocation. Study 4 (<i>N</i> = 1,135) found that higher Twitter status was associated with delayed prosocial speaking up. These findings suggest that elevated power is more conducive to prosocial behavior than elevated status.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1461672251324678"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251324678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Power and status are fundamental elements of social hierarchy, yet their influence on prosocial behavior remains unclear. To distinguish between prosocial and self-serving motives, we focused on behaviors that provide no benefit to the actor's status and may even harm it. We hypothesized that high power increases such behaviors compared to high status. In Studies 1a-2 (N = 824), participants in high-power roles were more likely to prevent harm or provide help at the expense of their reputation compared to those in high-status roles (Studies 1a-2), and those in low-power or low-status roles (Study 1a). In Study 3 (N = 150), greater perceived power was linked to increased anonymous resource allocation in a dictator game, while greater perceived status was linked to decreased allocation. Study 4 (N = 1,135) found that higher Twitter status was associated with delayed prosocial speaking up. These findings suggest that elevated power is more conducive to prosocial behavior than elevated status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力提升比地位提升更能促进亲社会行为。
权力和地位是社会等级的基本要素,但它们对亲社会行为的影响仍不明确。为了区分亲社会动机和自我服务动机,我们重点研究了对行为者的地位没有任何益处,甚至可能有害的行为。我们假设,与高地位相比,高权力会增加此类行为。在研究 1a-2(N = 824)中,与高地位角色(研究 1a-2)、低权力或低地位角色(研究 1a)的参与者相比,高权力角色的参与者更有可能以牺牲自己的声誉为代价来防止伤害或提供帮助。在研究 3(N = 150)中,在独裁者游戏中,感知到的权力越大,匿名资源分配就越多,而感知到的地位越高,资源分配就越少。研究 4(N = 1,135)发现,较高的推特地位与延迟亲社会发言有关。这些研究结果表明,提升权力比提升地位更有利于亲社会行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
期刊最新文献
New Wine in an Old Bottle? Exposure to Bullying-Related Media and Bullying Perpetration Behavior in Daily Life Among Adolescents. Cultural Tightness-Looseness and Individual Differences in Non-Normativeness Predict Stigmatization of Out-Groups: A Multilevel Cross-Cultural Study. Expressing Negativity Enhances Support From Romantic Partners, Even for Trivial Stressors. Is Progressive Ideology on the Test? Education and Intelligence in the Development of Nontraditional Attitudes. Prototype Facial Response to Cute Stimuli: Expression and Recognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1