[Effects of diverse influencing factors in clinical dental photography on depth-of-field sharpness and distortion: a comparative study].

W Zhao, X H Wang, W Li, R N Chen, X G Zhuo, J Chen
{"title":"[Effects of diverse influencing factors in clinical dental photography on depth-of-field sharpness and distortion: a comparative study].","authors":"W Zhao, X H Wang, W Li, R N Chen, X G Zhuo, J Chen","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20250119-00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the effects of different combinations of digital single-lens reflex cameras and macro lenses, aperture settings, and focusing points on depth-of-field sharpness and image distortion in dental clinical photography, and to provide evidence-based guidance for standardizing dental clinical photography. <b>Methods:</b> Full-frame and advanced photo system type-C APS-C digital single-lens reflex cameras were paired with 105 mm and 60 mm macro lenses. Photography was performed under eight preset aperture values (F16, F18, F20, F22, F25, F29, F32, and F36) on a standard oral model, focusing separately on three points simulating the central incisor, canine, and first molar. Five attending physicians, who had completed standardized training in dental esthetic clinical photography and calibration training (with over 5 years of dental clinical photography experience), evaluated the depth-of-field sharpness of the photographs using a double-blind method. Image distortion was assessed by measuring the width-to-length ratio of the central incisor. <b>Results:</b> Photographs taken with the APS-C digital single-lens reflex camera combined with the 105 mm macro lens showed significantly higher depth-of-field sharpness scores (2.756±0.357) compared to other camera-lens combinations (<i>P</i><0.05). Photographs taken at aperture settings of F25, F29, F32, and F36 demonstrated significantly higher depth-of-field sharpness scores than those taken at F16, F18, F20, and F22 (<i>P</i><0.05). Images focused on the simulated canine achieved the highest depth-of-field sharpness scores, followed by the central incisor, with the first molar showing the lowest scores (<i>P</i><0.05). Main effect and interaction effect tests revealed that camera-lens combinations significantly affected image distortion (<i>F</i>=2.79, <i>P</i>=0.042), while focusing points and aperture settings showed no significant effect on image distortion (<i>F</i>=0.40, <i>P</i>=0.671; <i>F</i>=1.27, <i>P</i>=0.270). <b>Conclusion:</b> Based on experimental data analysis, using an APS-C digital single-lens reflex camera with a 105 mm macro lens, setting the aperture value between F25 and F36, and focusing on the canine can ensure sufficient depth-of-field sharpness while avoiding image distortion, thereby achieving optimal results in dental clinical photography.</p>","PeriodicalId":23965,"journal":{"name":"中华口腔医学杂志","volume":"60 4","pages":"381-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20250119-00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of different combinations of digital single-lens reflex cameras and macro lenses, aperture settings, and focusing points on depth-of-field sharpness and image distortion in dental clinical photography, and to provide evidence-based guidance for standardizing dental clinical photography. Methods: Full-frame and advanced photo system type-C APS-C digital single-lens reflex cameras were paired with 105 mm and 60 mm macro lenses. Photography was performed under eight preset aperture values (F16, F18, F20, F22, F25, F29, F32, and F36) on a standard oral model, focusing separately on three points simulating the central incisor, canine, and first molar. Five attending physicians, who had completed standardized training in dental esthetic clinical photography and calibration training (with over 5 years of dental clinical photography experience), evaluated the depth-of-field sharpness of the photographs using a double-blind method. Image distortion was assessed by measuring the width-to-length ratio of the central incisor. Results: Photographs taken with the APS-C digital single-lens reflex camera combined with the 105 mm macro lens showed significantly higher depth-of-field sharpness scores (2.756±0.357) compared to other camera-lens combinations (P<0.05). Photographs taken at aperture settings of F25, F29, F32, and F36 demonstrated significantly higher depth-of-field sharpness scores than those taken at F16, F18, F20, and F22 (P<0.05). Images focused on the simulated canine achieved the highest depth-of-field sharpness scores, followed by the central incisor, with the first molar showing the lowest scores (P<0.05). Main effect and interaction effect tests revealed that camera-lens combinations significantly affected image distortion (F=2.79, P=0.042), while focusing points and aperture settings showed no significant effect on image distortion (F=0.40, P=0.671; F=1.27, P=0.270). Conclusion: Based on experimental data analysis, using an APS-C digital single-lens reflex camera with a 105 mm macro lens, setting the aperture value between F25 and F36, and focusing on the canine can ensure sufficient depth-of-field sharpness while avoiding image distortion, thereby achieving optimal results in dental clinical photography.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[临床牙科摄影中不同影响因素对景深清晰度和失真的影响:比较研究]。
目的:评价数码单反相机与微距镜头的不同组合、光圈设置和对焦点对牙科临床摄影景深清晰度和图像畸变的影响,为规范牙科临床摄影提供循证指导。方法:采用全画幅和先进照相系统c型APS-C型数码单反相机,配以105mm和60mm微距镜头。在8个预设光圈值(F16、F18、F20、F22、F25、F29、F32和F36)下对标准口腔模型进行摄影,分别聚焦在模拟中切牙、犬齿和第一磨牙的3个点上。5名完成牙科美容临床摄影标准化培训和校正培训(具有5年以上牙科临床摄影经验)的主治医师采用双盲法评估照片的景深清晰度。通过测量中切牙的宽长比来评估图像畸变。结果:APS-C数码单反相机与105 mm微距镜头组合拍摄的照片,其景深清晰度评分(2.756±0.357)显著高于其他相机镜头组合(PPPF=2.79, P=0.042),而对焦点和光圈设置对图像畸变无显著影响(F=0.40, P=0.671;F = 1.27, P = 0.270)。结论:基于实验数据分析,使用APS-C型数码单反相机配105 mm微距镜头,将光圈值设置在F25 ~ F36之间,对犬只进行聚焦,在保证足够的景深清晰度的同时避免图像失真,从而达到牙科临床摄影的最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华口腔医学杂志
中华口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9692
期刊介绍: Founded in August 1953, Chinese Journal of Stomatology is a monthly academic journal of stomatology published publicly at home and abroad, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and co-sponsored by the Chinese Stomatology Association. It mainly reports the leading scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the field of oral medicine, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding role in oral clinical practice and is closely combined with oral clinical practice. Chinese Journal of Over the years, Stomatology has been published in Medline, Scopus database, Toxicology Abstracts Database, Chemical Abstracts Database, American Cancer database, Russian Abstracts database, China Core Journal of Science and Technology, Peking University Core Journal, CSCD and other more than 20 important journals at home and abroad Physical medicine database and retrieval system included.
期刊最新文献
[Advances in the clinical application of folded flaps for maxillofacial defect reconstruction]. [Retrospective study of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics for improving the labial movement range of maxillary anterior teeth in skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion]. [Experimental study on the role of TRPM2 in regulating osteoblast differentiation through mitophagy in periodontitis]. [Biological characteristics and clinical application of sticky bone in periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics]. [Imbalance and reconstruction of periodontal homeostasis: new perspectives on the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of periodontitis].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1