Sexual identity and utilisation of primary healthcare services: findings from the New Zealand Health Survey.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.26635/6965.6718
Sonja J Ellis, Jintana Jankhotkaew, Stephen Neville, Jeffery Adams
{"title":"Sexual identity and utilisation of primary healthcare services: findings from the New Zealand Health Survey.","authors":"Sonja J Ellis, Jintana Jankhotkaew, Stephen Neville, Jeffery Adams","doi":"10.26635/6965.6718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using data extracted from the New Zealand Health Survey (NZHS), the purpose of this study was to compare lesbian, gay and bisexual people and heterosexual people on engagement with general practitioner (GP) and nursing services and patient experiences of GP services. Quantitative data spanning four waves of NZHS from the years 2017/2018 to 2020/2021 were used to undertake a comparative analysis of lesbian females, bisexual females, gay males, bisexual males and heterosexual males and females. Statistically significant differences were observed in the percentage of GP and nurse utilisation across sexual identity groups. Our analysis showed that both bisexual females and gay/bisexual males were significantly more likely to report poorer levels of trust in GPs and experience poorer explanation of doctors and health conditions. The findings of this study indicate that lesbian, gay and bisexual people have a poorer experience of GP services than do their heterosexual counterparts. These findings indicate the need for GPs and nurses to better understand the ways in which the health needs of lesbian, gay and bisexual people differ from those of heterosexuals to facilitate the provision of culturally appropriate care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"138 1612","pages":"60-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using data extracted from the New Zealand Health Survey (NZHS), the purpose of this study was to compare lesbian, gay and bisexual people and heterosexual people on engagement with general practitioner (GP) and nursing services and patient experiences of GP services. Quantitative data spanning four waves of NZHS from the years 2017/2018 to 2020/2021 were used to undertake a comparative analysis of lesbian females, bisexual females, gay males, bisexual males and heterosexual males and females. Statistically significant differences were observed in the percentage of GP and nurse utilisation across sexual identity groups. Our analysis showed that both bisexual females and gay/bisexual males were significantly more likely to report poorer levels of trust in GPs and experience poorer explanation of doctors and health conditions. The findings of this study indicate that lesbian, gay and bisexual people have a poorer experience of GP services than do their heterosexual counterparts. These findings indicate the need for GPs and nurses to better understand the ways in which the health needs of lesbian, gay and bisexual people differ from those of heterosexuals to facilitate the provision of culturally appropriate care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别认同和初级保健服务的利用:新西兰健康调查的结果。
利用新西兰健康调查(NZHS)的数据,本研究的目的是比较女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋者与异性恋者对全科医生(GP)和护理服务的参与情况以及全科医生服务的患者体验。利用2017/2018年至2020/2021年四波NZHS的定量数据,对女同性恋、双性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、异性恋男性和女性进行对比分析。在性别认同群体中,全科医生和护士的使用率有统计学上的显著差异。我们的分析表明,双性恋女性和同性恋/双性恋男性都更有可能报告对全科医生的信任度较低,对医生和健康状况的解释也较差。这项研究的结果表明,女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋者比异性恋者获得全科医生服务的体验更差。这些发现表明,全科医生和护士需要更好地了解女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋者的健康需求与异性恋者的不同之处,以促进提供文化上适当的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
Diagnoses of blood-borne viruses and other sexually transmitted infections in a sample of 356 sex workers attending a sexual health outreach clinic in Auckland over a two-year period. Evolving roles and workforce trends among nurse practitioners in Aotearoa New Zealand (2014-2022). Performance first: why the economic success of our nation is dependent on the health of our people and why privatisation by stealth won't fix New Zealand's health system. Ethnic differences in population-level intracerebral haemorrhage incidence in Aotearoa New Zealand: findings from three Auckland Regional Community Stroke cohorts. Addressing significant inequity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1