Parental Perception, Concern, and Dissatisfaction With Preschool Children's Weight and Their Associations With Feeding Practices in a Chinese Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2025.02.012
Jian Wang PhD , Kirsty Winkley PhD , Xiaoxue Wei MSc, RN , Yang Cao PhD , Yan-Shing Chang PhD
{"title":"Parental Perception, Concern, and Dissatisfaction With Preschool Children's Weight and Their Associations With Feeding Practices in a Chinese Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Jian Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Kirsty Winkley PhD ,&nbsp;Xiaoxue Wei MSc, RN ,&nbsp;Yang Cao PhD ,&nbsp;Yan-Shing Chang PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the associations between parental perception, concern, and dissatisfaction with child weight and their feeding practices among Chinese families.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Four public kindergartens in Yangzhou, China.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Chinese parents of preschool children (n = 1,779).</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Three responsive feeding practices (i.e., encouragement of healthy eating, monitoring, and modeling) and 3 nonresponsive feeding practices (i.e., pressure to eat, restriction, and use of food as a reward).</div></div><div><h3>Analysis</h3><div>Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to examine their associations. The agreement was evaluated with kappa statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Parents who perceived children as overweight or obese reported less pressure to eat (<em>P</em> = 0.04); parents who were concerned about children with underweight reported more pressure to eat (<em>P</em> = 0.01); parents who rated children's body weight size as underweight were less likely to encourage children to eat healthy food (<em>P</em> = 0.04) and restrict food intake (<em>P</em> = 0.02); parents who desired a slimmer child's body size reported less modeling (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and more restriction (<em>P</em> = 0.04). The disagreements between parental self-reported and visual perception of child weight and actual child weight were statistically significant, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>The results suggested the significant influence of parental perception, concern, and dissatisfaction with child weight on feeding practices. Our findings may inform public health practitioners and primary care providers in designing interventions to enhance parental accurate weight perception and optimize feeding practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"57 6","pages":"Pages 482-496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149940462500051X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the associations between parental perception, concern, and dissatisfaction with child weight and their feeding practices among Chinese families.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Setting

Four public kindergartens in Yangzhou, China.

Participants

Chinese parents of preschool children (n = 1,779).

Main Outcome Measures

Three responsive feeding practices (i.e., encouragement of healthy eating, monitoring, and modeling) and 3 nonresponsive feeding practices (i.e., pressure to eat, restriction, and use of food as a reward).

Analysis

Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to examine their associations. The agreement was evaluated with kappa statistics.

Results

Parents who perceived children as overweight or obese reported less pressure to eat (P = 0.04); parents who were concerned about children with underweight reported more pressure to eat (P = 0.01); parents who rated children's body weight size as underweight were less likely to encourage children to eat healthy food (P = 0.04) and restrict food intake (P = 0.02); parents who desired a slimmer child's body size reported less modeling (P < 0.001) and more restriction (P = 0.04). The disagreements between parental self-reported and visual perception of child weight and actual child weight were statistically significant, respectively (P < 0.01).

Conclusions and Implications

The results suggested the significant influence of parental perception, concern, and dissatisfaction with child weight on feeding practices. Our findings may inform public health practitioners and primary care providers in designing interventions to enhance parental accurate weight perception and optimize feeding practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母对学龄前儿童体重的感知、关注和不满意及其与喂养方式的关系:一项横断面研究。
目的:探讨中国家庭中父母对儿童体重的认知、关注和不满与其喂养方式之间的关系。设计:横断面研究。背景:中国扬州四所公立幼儿园。研究对象:中国学龄前儿童家长(n = 1779)。主要结果测量:三种反应性喂养方法(即,鼓励健康饮食、监测和建模)和三种非反应性喂养方法(即,压力进食、限制和使用食物作为奖励)。分析:采用层次多元回归分析检验其相关性。采用kappa统计对一致性进行评价。结果:认为孩子超重或肥胖的父母报告的饮食压力较小(P = 0.04);担心孩子体重过轻的父母报告的饮食压力更大(P = 0.01);将孩子的体重大小评为体重过轻的父母不太可能鼓励孩子吃健康食品(P = 0.04)和限制食物摄入(P = 0.02);希望孩子身材苗条的父母较少模仿(P < 0.001),限制较多(P = 0.04)。家长自述和视觉感知的儿童体重与实际体重差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。结论和意义:结果提示父母对儿童体重的认知、关注和不满意对喂养方式有显著影响。我们的研究结果可以为公共卫生从业人员和初级保健提供者设计干预措施以提高父母准确的体重感知和优化喂养方法提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
Modernization of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program: Rationale and Overview of the THIS-WIC (Telehealth Intervention Strategies for WIC) Project. Corrigendum to 'Western, Healthful, and Low-Preparation Diet Patterns in Preschoolers of the STRONG Kids2 Program' [Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 56/4 (2024) 219-229]. Practical Qualitative Research Strategies: An Introduction to Data Analysis and Rigorous Coding Practices. A Participatory Investigation of Breastfeeding Behavior in the Pakistani Community in the United Kingdom. More PEAS Please! Improves Preschool Children's Science Knowledge and Language Development Through Food-Based Learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1