Affective Responses to Barbell-Based Resistance Training in a 16-Week Barbell-Based Strength Training Program for Recreationally Active Adults.

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.3390/sports13030088
Vanessa M Martinez Kercher, Janelle M Goss, Janette M Watkins, Liam A Phillips, Brad A Roy, James F Dow, Lilian Golzarri-Arroyo, Kyle A Kercher
{"title":"Affective Responses to Barbell-Based Resistance Training in a 16-Week Barbell-Based Strength Training Program for Recreationally Active Adults.","authors":"Vanessa M Martinez Kercher, Janelle M Goss, Janette M Watkins, Liam A Phillips, Brad A Roy, James F Dow, Lilian Golzarri-Arroyo, Kyle A Kercher","doi":"10.3390/sports13030088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the well-established physical benefits of resistance training (RT), only 31% of U.S. adults meet RT guidelines, with women participating at lower rates. While the physiological aspects of RT are well researched, less is known about the psychological factors, such as affective responses (e.g., enjoyment, energy). This study explored the relationships between self-efficacy, self-determined motivation, affective responses, and adherence in a 16-week barbell-based RT program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective longitudinal study was conducted with 43 adults (M age = 45.09 ± 10.7, 81.8% female) enrolled in a community-based RT program. Affective responses were measured pre- and post-training, within RT sessions, and over time. Repeated-measures ANOVA and correlational analyses were used to examine relationships between psychological variables, affective responses, and adherence to the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported significant improvements in positive affective responses post-training and across the program's duration. Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation were positively associated with higher affective responses and greater adherence. Strength exercises elicited more positive affects compared to power exercises, and lifting heavier relative loads was correlated with more favorable emotional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights the importance of psychological factors, such as self-efficacy and motivation, in the relationship of affective responses to RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13030088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the well-established physical benefits of resistance training (RT), only 31% of U.S. adults meet RT guidelines, with women participating at lower rates. While the physiological aspects of RT are well researched, less is known about the psychological factors, such as affective responses (e.g., enjoyment, energy). This study explored the relationships between self-efficacy, self-determined motivation, affective responses, and adherence in a 16-week barbell-based RT program.

Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted with 43 adults (M age = 45.09 ± 10.7, 81.8% female) enrolled in a community-based RT program. Affective responses were measured pre- and post-training, within RT sessions, and over time. Repeated-measures ANOVA and correlational analyses were used to examine relationships between psychological variables, affective responses, and adherence to the program.

Results: Participants reported significant improvements in positive affective responses post-training and across the program's duration. Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation were positively associated with higher affective responses and greater adherence. Strength exercises elicited more positive affects compared to power exercises, and lifting heavier relative loads was correlated with more favorable emotional outcomes.

Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of psychological factors, such as self-efficacy and motivation, in the relationship of affective responses to RT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为期 16 周的以杠铃为基础的阻力训练项目中的情感反应,该项目针对从事休闲活动的成年人。
背景:尽管阻力训练(RT)对身体有益,但只有31%的美国成年人符合RT指南,女性参与的比例更低。虽然RT的生理方面研究得很好,但对心理因素知之甚少,例如情感反应(例如,享受,精力)。本研究探讨了自我效能感、自我决定动机、情感反应和依从性之间的关系。方法:对43名成人(M年龄= 45.09±10.7,81.8%为女性)进行前瞻性纵向研究,纳入社区RT计划。在训练前和训练后,在RT会议中以及随着时间的推移,测量了情感反应。使用重复测量方差分析和相关分析来检查心理变量、情感反应和依从性之间的关系。结果:参与者报告了在训练后和整个项目持续时间内积极情感反应的显著改善。自我效能和内在动机与更高的情感反应和更强的依从性呈正相关。与力量练习相比,力量练习能产生更多积极的影响,而举起更重的相对负荷与更有利的情绪结果相关。结论:本研究强调了自我效能感和动机等心理因素在RT情感反应关系中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Between-Session Reliability of Portable Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull and Countermovement Jump Tests in Elite Male Ice Hockey Players from the Swedish Hockey League. "All Hands on Deck": A Systematic Review of Concussion Guidelines Across All Sailing Sports and a Call to Action. Differential Balance Enhancements Associated with Conventional Balance Training and Portable Slackline Board Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Yoga for Neurodegenerative Disorders: Therapeutic Effects, Mechanisms, and Applications in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease. Competition Stress Prolongs Exercise Recovery in Female Division I Collegiate Soccer Players.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1