Efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants for perioperative management of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-106345
Martina Ollosu, Vincenzo Francesco Tripodi, Alessandro Bonu, Guglielmo Cittadini, Mario Musu, Mariachiara Ippolito, Andrea Cortegiani, Gabriele Finco, Salvatore Sardo
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants for perioperative management of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Martina Ollosu, Vincenzo Francesco Tripodi, Alessandro Bonu, Guglielmo Cittadini, Mario Musu, Mariachiara Ippolito, Andrea Cortegiani, Gabriele Finco, Salvatore Sardo","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean section (CS) rates have increased globally, necessitating effective anesthesia management. Single-shot spinal anesthesia has limitations due to its duration and the dose-limiting adverse effects of local anesthetics.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrathecal adjuvants combined with local anesthetics in the perioperative management of CS pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library for Clinical Trials, and Embase.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included women undergoing CS under single-shot spinal anesthesia with any intrathecal drug or placebo added to a long-acting local anesthetic. We selected single- or double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English. We excluded crossover, non-randomized, up-and-down dose-finding studies and clinical trials comparing the same drugs in all study arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 166 RCTs with 14 925 patients assigned to 32 interventions. Buprenorphine and diamorphine were the highest-ranked treatments for reducing pain intensity at 24 hours, though not statistically significant. Morphine alone or in combination with meperidine, neostigmine, epinephrine, or nalbuphine significantly increased the duration of effective analgesia and reduced opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine and morphine significantly prolonged the motor block duration. The safety profile of intrathecal adjuvants was generally adequate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the strength of evidence, overall, was very low to low, our study suggests that while none of the interventions significantly reduced pain intensity at 24 hours, several significantly prolonged effective analgesia and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine and morphine prolonged the duration of motor block. None of the intrathecal adjuvants evaluated significantly increased the occurrence of severe adverse events. Future large-scale RCTs are essential to provide more robust evidence.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024479424.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section (CS) rates have increased globally, necessitating effective anesthesia management. Single-shot spinal anesthesia has limitations due to its duration and the dose-limiting adverse effects of local anesthetics.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrathecal adjuvants combined with local anesthetics in the perioperative management of CS pain.

Design: Systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Data sources: PubMed, Cochrane Library for Clinical Trials, and Embase.

Eligibility criteria: We included women undergoing CS under single-shot spinal anesthesia with any intrathecal drug or placebo added to a long-acting local anesthetic. We selected single- or double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English. We excluded crossover, non-randomized, up-and-down dose-finding studies and clinical trials comparing the same drugs in all study arms.

Results: We included 166 RCTs with 14 925 patients assigned to 32 interventions. Buprenorphine and diamorphine were the highest-ranked treatments for reducing pain intensity at 24 hours, though not statistically significant. Morphine alone or in combination with meperidine, neostigmine, epinephrine, or nalbuphine significantly increased the duration of effective analgesia and reduced opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine and morphine significantly prolonged the motor block duration. The safety profile of intrathecal adjuvants was generally adequate.

Conclusions: While the strength of evidence, overall, was very low to low, our study suggests that while none of the interventions significantly reduced pain intensity at 24 hours, several significantly prolonged effective analgesia and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. Dexmedetomidine and morphine prolonged the duration of motor block. None of the intrathecal adjuvants evaluated significantly increased the occurrence of severe adverse events. Future large-scale RCTs are essential to provide more robust evidence.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024479424.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鞘内佐剂用于剖宫产围手术期治疗的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
背景:全球剖宫产率上升,需要有效的麻醉管理。单针脊髓麻醉由于其持续时间和局部麻醉剂的剂量限制性副作用而具有局限性。目的:评价鞘内佐剂联合局麻药在CS疼痛围手术期治疗中的有效性和安全性。设计:采用网络荟萃分析进行系统评价。数据来源:PubMed, Cochrane临床试验图书馆和Embase。入选标准:我们纳入了在单次脊髓麻醉下接受CS的妇女,任何鞘内药物或安慰剂加长效局麻药。我们选择了用英文报道的单盲或双盲、平行组、随机对照试验(rct)。我们排除了交叉、非随机、上下剂量研究和在所有研究组中比较相同药物的临床试验。结果:我们纳入166项随机对照试验,14925名患者被分配到32项干预措施中。丁丙诺啡和diamorphine是在24小时内减轻疼痛强度方面排名最高的治疗方法,尽管没有统计学意义。吗啡单用或联用哌嗪、新斯的明、肾上腺素或纳布啡可显著增加有效镇痛的持续时间,减少阿片类药物的消耗。右美托咪定和吗啡显著延长运动阻滞持续时间。鞘内佐剂的安全性总体上是足够的。结论:虽然证据的强度总体上很低,但我们的研究表明,虽然没有一种干预措施显着降低了24小时的疼痛强度,但有几种干预措施显着延长了有效镇痛时间并减少了术后阿片类药物的消耗。右美托咪定和吗啡可延长运动阻滞持续时间。经评估的鞘内佐剂均未显著增加严重不良事件的发生。未来的大规模随机对照试验对于提供更有力的证据至关重要。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024479424。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Multisociety multispecialty position statement on corticosteroid injections and influenza and COVID-19 vaccine administration. Defining a bony landmark-based target zone for superior cluneal nerve blockade: a cadaveric mapping study. Examining secondary outcomes after brief pain reprocessing therapy: improvements in mood disturbance and fatigue and their relationship to pain intensity. Artificial intelligence assistance (ASReview Lab) reduces screening workload but its practical impact remains uncertain: a post hoc analysis of a regional anesthesia systematic review. Correction: Reduced BDNF expression in the auditory cortex contributed to neonatal pain-induced hearing impairment and dendritic pruning deficiency in mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1