Atmospheric Aerosols Versus Total Atmospheric Deposition in Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles): Composition, Concentration, and Flux

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1029/2024JD042682
Yangjunjie Xu-Yang, Rémi Losno, Céline Dessert, Fabrice Monna, Natalie M. Mahowald, Mickael Tharaud
{"title":"Atmospheric Aerosols Versus Total Atmospheric Deposition in Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles): Composition, Concentration, and Flux","authors":"Yangjunjie Xu-Yang,&nbsp;Rémi Losno,&nbsp;Céline Dessert,&nbsp;Fabrice Monna,&nbsp;Natalie M. Mahowald,&nbsp;Mickael Tharaud","doi":"10.1029/2024JD042682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Atmospheric mineral dust deposition is an important source of nutrients for ocean and tropical island ecosystems. Direct deposition measurements are generally more reliable at local scale than dust deposition models, even those based on aerosol concentration measurements. Whatever the scale, relevant local observations are necessary for model evaluation. We present here the results obtained by direct measurement of atmospheric aerosols and total atmospheric deposition using a 14-month time series from the Caribbean region. Total deposition velocity, lifetime, and scavenging ratio of major and trace elements were determined. Comparing total deposition fluxes of aluminum (dust proxy) and sea-salt sodium (sea-salt proxy) with Community Atmosphere Model (CAM6) outputs shows that the modeled total deposition rate is underestimated by a factor of two for dust and by a factor of eight for sea salt, while model aerosol concentration is larger than concentration measured near ground level. This result is due to wet deposition being underestimated in the model. The scavenging ratio (w/w) of Saharan dust elements ranges from 95 to 1,390, with a median of 530, close to the geometric mean value of 513. Sea salt presents a greater range of scavenging ratio values, from 325 to 2,355, with a median of 1,180, close to the geometric mean value of 1,030. The lead isotope ratio <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>207</sup>Pb clearly highlights differences in lead origin between aerosols and deposits, revealing that aerosol samples are enriched by anthropogenic sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JD042682","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atmospheric mineral dust deposition is an important source of nutrients for ocean and tropical island ecosystems. Direct deposition measurements are generally more reliable at local scale than dust deposition models, even those based on aerosol concentration measurements. Whatever the scale, relevant local observations are necessary for model evaluation. We present here the results obtained by direct measurement of atmospheric aerosols and total atmospheric deposition using a 14-month time series from the Caribbean region. Total deposition velocity, lifetime, and scavenging ratio of major and trace elements were determined. Comparing total deposition fluxes of aluminum (dust proxy) and sea-salt sodium (sea-salt proxy) with Community Atmosphere Model (CAM6) outputs shows that the modeled total deposition rate is underestimated by a factor of two for dust and by a factor of eight for sea salt, while model aerosol concentration is larger than concentration measured near ground level. This result is due to wet deposition being underestimated in the model. The scavenging ratio (w/w) of Saharan dust elements ranges from 95 to 1,390, with a median of 530, close to the geometric mean value of 513. Sea salt presents a greater range of scavenging ratio values, from 325 to 2,355, with a median of 1,180, close to the geometric mean value of 1,030. The lead isotope ratio 206Pb/207Pb clearly highlights differences in lead origin between aerosols and deposits, revealing that aerosol samples are enriched by anthropogenic sources.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大气气溶胶与瓜德罗普岛(小安的列斯群岛)大气总沉降:组成、浓度和通量
大气矿物粉尘沉积是海洋和热带岛屿生态系统的重要营养来源。在局部尺度上,直接沉积测量通常比粉尘沉积模型更可靠,即使是那些基于气溶胶浓度测量的模型。无论何种尺度,对模式评价都需要相关的局部观测。我们在这里介绍了使用加勒比海地区14个月时间序列直接测量大气气溶胶和大气总沉积的结果。测定了总沉积速度、寿命和主微量元素的清除率。将铝(粉尘代用物)和海盐钠(海盐代用物)的总沉降通量与群落大气模型(CAM6)的输出结果进行比较,结果表明,模拟的总沉降速率低估了粉尘的2倍和海盐的8倍,而模型气溶胶浓度大于近地面测量的浓度。这一结果是由于在模型中低估了湿沉积。撒哈拉沙尘元素的清除率(w/w)在95 ~ 1390之间,中位数为530,接近几何平均值513。海盐的清除率值范围较大,为325 ~ 2355,中位数为1180,接近几何平均值1030。铅同位素比值206Pb/207Pb明显突出了气溶胶和沉积物中铅来源的差异,表明气溶胶样品受到人为来源的富集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
期刊最新文献
Global Atmospheric Release of Methoxyphenols From Wildfires Assimilation of 0–20 cm Soil Moisture Effectively Prompts Soil Profile and Land Surface Flux Simulation A Helicity-Based Analysis of the Stratospheric Polar Vortex Evolution Clustering Analysis of Very Large Measurement and Model Data Sets on High-Performance Computing Platforms An Approach for Simultaneous Estimation of Entrainment and Detrainment Rates in Deep Convective Clouds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1