International multispecialty expert physician preoperative identification of extranodal extension in patients with oropharyngeal cancer using computed tomography: Prospective blinded human inter-observer performance evaluation

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-30 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35815
Onur Sahin PhD, Serageldin Kamel MD, Kareem A. Wahid PhD, Cem Dede MD, Nicolette Taku MD, MPhil, MPH, Renjie He PhD, Mohamed A. Naser PhD, Christina S. Sharafi BS, Antti Mäkitie MD, PhD, Benjamin H. Kann MD, Kimmo Kaski PhD, Jaakko Sahlsten DSc, Joel Jaskari DSc, Moran Amit MD, PhD, Gregory M. Chronowski MD, Eduardo M. Diaz Jr. MD, Adam S. Garden MD, Ryan P. Goepfert MD, Jeffrey P. Guenette MD, MPH, G. Brandon Gunn MD, Jussi Hirvonen MD, PhD, Frank Hoebers MD, PhD, Katherine A. Hutcheson PhD, Nandita Guha-Thakurta MD, Jason Johnson MD, Diana Kaya MD, Shekhar D. Khanpara MD, Kristofer Nyman MD, Stephen Y. Lai MD, PhD, Miriam Lango MD, Kim O. Learned MD, Anna Lee MD, MPH, Carol M. Lewis MD, MPH, Anastasios Maniakas MD, PhD, Amy C. Moreno MD, MS, Jeffrey N. Myers MD, PhD, Jack Phan MD, PhD, Kristen B. Pytynia MD, MPH, David I. Rosenthal MD, Vlad C. Sandulache MD, PhD, Dawid Schellingerhout MBChB, MBA, Shalin J. Shah MD, Andrew G. Sikora MD, PhD, Abdallah S. R. Mohamed MD, PhD, Melissa M. Chen MD, Clifton D. Fuller MD, PhD, Multidisciplinary Oropharyngeal Cancer Extra-Nodal Extension (OPC ENE) Assessment Working Group
{"title":"International multispecialty expert physician preoperative identification of extranodal extension in patients with oropharyngeal cancer using computed tomography: Prospective blinded human inter-observer performance evaluation","authors":"Onur Sahin PhD,&nbsp;Serageldin Kamel MD,&nbsp;Kareem A. Wahid PhD,&nbsp;Cem Dede MD,&nbsp;Nicolette Taku MD, MPhil, MPH,&nbsp;Renjie He PhD,&nbsp;Mohamed A. Naser PhD,&nbsp;Christina S. Sharafi BS,&nbsp;Antti Mäkitie MD, PhD,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Kann MD,&nbsp;Kimmo Kaski PhD,&nbsp;Jaakko Sahlsten DSc,&nbsp;Joel Jaskari DSc,&nbsp;Moran Amit MD, PhD,&nbsp;Gregory M. Chronowski MD,&nbsp;Eduardo M. Diaz Jr. MD,&nbsp;Adam S. Garden MD,&nbsp;Ryan P. Goepfert MD,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Guenette MD, MPH,&nbsp;G. Brandon Gunn MD,&nbsp;Jussi Hirvonen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Frank Hoebers MD, PhD,&nbsp;Katherine A. Hutcheson PhD,&nbsp;Nandita Guha-Thakurta MD,&nbsp;Jason Johnson MD,&nbsp;Diana Kaya MD,&nbsp;Shekhar D. Khanpara MD,&nbsp;Kristofer Nyman MD,&nbsp;Stephen Y. Lai MD, PhD,&nbsp;Miriam Lango MD,&nbsp;Kim O. Learned MD,&nbsp;Anna Lee MD, MPH,&nbsp;Carol M. Lewis MD, MPH,&nbsp;Anastasios Maniakas MD, PhD,&nbsp;Amy C. Moreno MD, MS,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Myers MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jack Phan MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kristen B. Pytynia MD, MPH,&nbsp;David I. Rosenthal MD,&nbsp;Vlad C. Sandulache MD, PhD,&nbsp;Dawid Schellingerhout MBChB, MBA,&nbsp;Shalin J. Shah MD,&nbsp;Andrew G. Sikora MD, PhD,&nbsp;Abdallah S. R. Mohamed MD, PhD,&nbsp;Melissa M. Chen MD,&nbsp;Clifton D. Fuller MD, PhD,&nbsp;Multidisciplinary Oropharyngeal Cancer Extra-Nodal Extension (OPC ENE) Assessment Working Group","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pathologic extranodal extension (pENE) is a crucial prognostic factor in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), but determining pENE from imaging has high inter-observer variability. The role of clinician specialty in the accuracy of imaging-detected extranodal extension (iENE) remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of clinician specialty on the accuracy of preoperative iENE detection in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive OPC using computed tomography (CT) imaging.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective observational study evaluated pretherapy CT images from 24 HPV-positive OPC patients (30 scans, including duplicates). Thirty-four expert observers (11 radiologists, 12 surgeons, 11 radiation oncologists) assessed iENE and reported radiologic criteria and confidence. Ground-truth pENE status was confirmed pathologically. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and Brier scores were compared across specialties. Logistic regression determined significant predictors of pENE, whereas Fleiss’ kappa measured interobserver agreement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Median accuracy was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.39–0.73), with no specialty showing performance beyond chance (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.64). Minor differences were noted: surgeons had lower Brier scores (0.26 vs. 0.33, <i>p</i> &lt; .01) and higher sensitivity (0.69 vs. 0.48) compared to radiologists and oncologists. Predictive signs included indistinct capsular contour and nodal necrosis. Interobserver agreement was weak (κ &lt; 0.6).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Diagnostic performance for iENE on CT in HPV-positive OPC remains poor across specialties, with high variability and low accuracy. These findings highlight the need for automated systems or improved imaging methods to enhance iENE assessments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35815","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pathologic extranodal extension (pENE) is a crucial prognostic factor in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), but determining pENE from imaging has high inter-observer variability. The role of clinician specialty in the accuracy of imaging-detected extranodal extension (iENE) remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of clinician specialty on the accuracy of preoperative iENE detection in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive OPC using computed tomography (CT) imaging.

Methods

This prospective observational study evaluated pretherapy CT images from 24 HPV-positive OPC patients (30 scans, including duplicates). Thirty-four expert observers (11 radiologists, 12 surgeons, 11 radiation oncologists) assessed iENE and reported radiologic criteria and confidence. Ground-truth pENE status was confirmed pathologically. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and Brier scores were compared across specialties. Logistic regression determined significant predictors of pENE, whereas Fleiss’ kappa measured interobserver agreement.

Results

Median accuracy was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.39–0.73), with no specialty showing performance beyond chance (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.64). Minor differences were noted: surgeons had lower Brier scores (0.26 vs. 0.33, p < .01) and higher sensitivity (0.69 vs. 0.48) compared to radiologists and oncologists. Predictive signs included indistinct capsular contour and nodal necrosis. Interobserver agreement was weak (κ < 0.6).

Conclusions

Diagnostic performance for iENE on CT in HPV-positive OPC remains poor across specialties, with high variability and low accuracy. These findings highlight the need for automated systems or improved imaging methods to enhance iENE assessments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际多专业专家医师术前使用计算机断层识别口咽癌患者结外延伸:前瞻性盲法人类观察者间表现评估
病理结外延伸(pENE)是口咽癌(OPC)的一个关键预后因素,但通过影像学来确定pENE在观察者之间具有很高的可变性。临床医生的专业在影像学检测结外延伸(iENE)的准确性方面的作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估临床医生专业对使用计算机断层扫描(CT)成像检测人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)阳性OPC术前iENE准确性的影响。方法本前瞻性观察研究评估了24例hpv阳性OPC患者治疗前的CT图像(30次扫描,包括重复扫描)。34名专家观察员(11名放射科医生、12名外科医生、11名放射肿瘤学家)评估了iENE并报告了放射学标准和置信度。病理证实了pENE的真实状态。准确度、灵敏度、特异性、受试者工作特征曲线下面积和Brier评分在各专业间进行比较。逻辑回归确定了pENE的显著预测因子,而Fleiss的kappa测量了观察者间的一致性。结果中位准确度为0.57 (95% CI, 0.39-0.73),没有任何特殊表现超出机会(受试者工作特征曲线下的中位面积,0.64)。注意到细微的差异:外科医生的Brier评分较低(0.26比0.33,p <;与放射科医生和肿瘤科医生相比,他们的敏感度更高(0.69比0.48)。预测征象包括囊膜轮廓模糊和结节坏死。观察者间一致性较弱(κ <;0.6)。结论iENE在CT上对hpv阳性OPC的诊断在各专科仍较差,具有高变异性和低准确性。这些发现强调需要自动化系统或改进成像方法来加强iENE评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
The myeloma divide: How sex and age shape disease characteristics. Combination of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone for patients with treatment-naive peripheral T-cell lymphoma: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 1b trial. Psychosocial factors and the risk of cancer: An individual-participant data meta-analysis. The impact of the patient macroenvironment on molecular subgroups in endometrial cancer. Risks of thrombosis and hemorrhage in concurrent use of anticoagulants and potential interacting prostate cancer agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1