Perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with microsatellite instability or deficient mismatch repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-30 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35831
Baike Liu MD, Chaoyong Shen MD, Xiaonan Yin MD, PhD, Tianxiang Jiang MD, Yihui Han MD, Ruiwan Yuan MD, Yuan Yin MD, Zhaolun Cai MD, Bo Zhang MD
{"title":"Perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with microsatellite instability or deficient mismatch repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Baike Liu MD,&nbsp;Chaoyong Shen MD,&nbsp;Xiaonan Yin MD, PhD,&nbsp;Tianxiang Jiang MD,&nbsp;Yihui Han MD,&nbsp;Ruiwan Yuan MD,&nbsp;Yuan Yin MD,&nbsp;Zhaolun Cai MD,&nbsp;Bo Zhang MD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was preregistered with the PROSPERO platform (CRD42023494276), and studies comparing perioperative chemotherapy with surgery alone in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GC were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of survival outcomes were extracted. A random-effects model was used in the pooled analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two studies, which encompassed approximately 1600 patients with dMMR/MSI-H GC, were included. The results indicated that perioperative chemotherapy does not significantly improve overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58–1.26) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.53–1.12) in dMMR/MSI-H GC. In the subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved OS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.50–1.37) but was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43–0.96). However, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for DFS was not significant in the pooled analysis of multivariable-adjusted results. Similar results were observed for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OS: HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.44–1.57; DFS: HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.50–2.53). Additionally, stage stratification analysis demonstrated no significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II (OS: HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.31–1.90) or stage III (OS: HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.36–1.46) dMMR/MSI-H GC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite indications that adjuvant chemotherapy may improve DFS in the subgroup analysis, this benefit was not sustained in multivariate assessments. Overall, the pooled results indicate that perioperative chemotherapy does not significantly improve OS or DFS in patients with resectable dMMR/MSI-H GC, and therefore such treatment may be spared in these patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial.

Methods

This study was preregistered with the PROSPERO platform (CRD42023494276), and studies comparing perioperative chemotherapy with surgery alone in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GC were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of survival outcomes were extracted. A random-effects model was used in the pooled analysis.

Results

Twenty-two studies, which encompassed approximately 1600 patients with dMMR/MSI-H GC, were included. The results indicated that perioperative chemotherapy does not significantly improve overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58–1.26) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.53–1.12) in dMMR/MSI-H GC. In the subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved OS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.50–1.37) but was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43–0.96). However, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for DFS was not significant in the pooled analysis of multivariable-adjusted results. Similar results were observed for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OS: HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.44–1.57; DFS: HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.50–2.53). Additionally, stage stratification analysis demonstrated no significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II (OS: HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.31–1.90) or stage III (OS: HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.36–1.46) dMMR/MSI-H GC.

Conclusions

Despite indications that adjuvant chemotherapy may improve DFS in the subgroup analysis, this benefit was not sustained in multivariate assessments. Overall, the pooled results indicate that perioperative chemotherapy does not significantly improve OS or DFS in patients with resectable dMMR/MSI-H GC, and therefore such treatment may be spared in these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微卫星不稳定或错配修复缺陷胃癌患者围手术期化疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景对缺陷错配修复或微卫星不稳定性高(dMMR/MSI-H)胃癌(GC)围手术期化疗的疗效仍存在争议。方法本研究在PROSPERO平台预注册(CRD42023494276),并纳入了比较可切除dMMR/MSI-H GC围手术期化疗与单纯手术的研究。提取生存结果的风险比(hr)及其95%置信区间(CIs)。合并分析采用随机效应模型。结果纳入22项研究,约1600例dMMR/MSI-H GC患者。结果显示围手术期化疗不能显著提高总生存期(OS) (HR, 0.85;95% CI, 0.58-1.26)和无病生存期(DFS) (HR, 0.77;dMMR/MSI-H GC 95% CI, 0.53-1.12)。在亚组分析中,辅助化疗与OS改善无关(HR, 0.83;95% CI, 0.50-1.37),但与改善的DFS相关(HR, 0.64;95% ci, 0.43-0.96)。然而,在多变量调整结果的汇总分析中,辅助化疗对DFS的益处并不显著。在新辅助化疗中也观察到类似的结果(OS: HR, 0.84;95% ci, 0.44-1.57;Dfs: hr, 1.13;95% ci, 0.50-2.53)。此外,分期分层分析显示,辅助化疗对II期患者没有显著的生存益处(OS: HR, 0.77;95% CI, 0.31-1.90)或III期(OS: HR, 0.72;95% CI, 0.36-1.46) dMMR/MSI-H GC。结论:尽管在亚组分析中有迹象表明辅助化疗可以改善DFS,但在多变量评估中这种益处并未持续。总的来说,综合结果表明围手术期化疗不能显著改善可切除dMMR/MSI-H GC患者的OS或DFS,因此这些患者可以省去化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
The myeloma divide: How sex and age shape disease characteristics. Combination of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone for patients with treatment-naive peripheral T-cell lymphoma: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 1b trial. Psychosocial factors and the risk of cancer: An individual-participant data meta-analysis. The impact of the patient macroenvironment on molecular subgroups in endometrial cancer. Risks of thrombosis and hemorrhage in concurrent use of anticoagulants and potential interacting prostate cancer agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1