Convergent and Known-Groups Validity and Sensitivity to Change of the Virtual Performance Measure in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Longitudinal Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.2196/69001
Helen Razmjou, Suzanne Denis, Susan Robarts, Amy Wainwright, Patricia Dickson, John Murnaghan
{"title":"Convergent and Known-Groups Validity and Sensitivity to Change of the Virtual Performance Measure in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Helen Razmjou, Suzanne Denis, Susan Robarts, Amy Wainwright, Patricia Dickson, John Murnaghan","doi":"10.2196/69001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subsequent to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, a different approach to health care utilization was required to improve safety and efficiency. In the postpandemic era, virtual care and remote assessment of musculoskeletal conditions has become more common, and examining the accuracy of these remote encounters remains vital. In 2023, an innovative, video-based tool-the Virtual Performance Measure (VPM)-was introduced to assess the functional difficulties of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Further validation of this tool is warranted to expand its application longitudinally and in more diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the longitudinal validity of the VPM, a digitally based outcome tool, in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee joints who had undergone arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients completed a web-based survey after watching 40 videos that demonstrated 10 functional tasks with increasing difficulty, prior to and at approximately 3-5 months following surgery. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) was used as the reference measure. Longitudinal convergent and known-groups validity as well as sensitivity to change were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 120 patients (n=80, 67% female; mean age 67, SD 9 years; n=58, 48% with hip osteoarthritis and n=62, 52% with knee osteoarthritis) were examined. There was a statistically significant improvement in both LEFS (t<sub>119</sub>=16.04, P<.001) and VPM total scores (t<sub>119</sub>=13.92, P<.001) over time. The correlation between the postoperative LEFS and VPM scores was higher (r=0.66; P<.001) than the correlation between the change scores of these measures (r=0.51; P<.001). The area under the curve value for the VPM's ability to differentiate between urgent and nonurgent candidates for surgery was 0.71 (95% CI 0.57-0.84). Sensitivity to change as measured by the standardized response mean was 1.27 (95% CI 1.09-1.45), indicating good ability to detect change over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VPM demonstrated sufficient longitudinal convergent and known-groups validity as well as sensitivity to change in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis following arthroplasty. This tool has a potential to improve the delivery of care by increasing access, reducing the frequency of in-person visits, and improving the overall efficiency of the health care system following a major surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e69001"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/69001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subsequent to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, a different approach to health care utilization was required to improve safety and efficiency. In the postpandemic era, virtual care and remote assessment of musculoskeletal conditions has become more common, and examining the accuracy of these remote encounters remains vital. In 2023, an innovative, video-based tool-the Virtual Performance Measure (VPM)-was introduced to assess the functional difficulties of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Further validation of this tool is warranted to expand its application longitudinally and in more diverse populations.

Objective: This study examined the longitudinal validity of the VPM, a digitally based outcome tool, in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee joints who had undergone arthroplasty.

Methods: Patients completed a web-based survey after watching 40 videos that demonstrated 10 functional tasks with increasing difficulty, prior to and at approximately 3-5 months following surgery. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) was used as the reference measure. Longitudinal convergent and known-groups validity as well as sensitivity to change were assessed.

Results: The data of 120 patients (n=80, 67% female; mean age 67, SD 9 years; n=58, 48% with hip osteoarthritis and n=62, 52% with knee osteoarthritis) were examined. There was a statistically significant improvement in both LEFS (t119=16.04, P<.001) and VPM total scores (t119=13.92, P<.001) over time. The correlation between the postoperative LEFS and VPM scores was higher (r=0.66; P<.001) than the correlation between the change scores of these measures (r=0.51; P<.001). The area under the curve value for the VPM's ability to differentiate between urgent and nonurgent candidates for surgery was 0.71 (95% CI 0.57-0.84). Sensitivity to change as measured by the standardized response mean was 1.27 (95% CI 1.09-1.45), indicating good ability to detect change over time.

Conclusions: The VPM demonstrated sufficient longitudinal convergent and known-groups validity as well as sensitivity to change in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis following arthroplasty. This tool has a potential to improve the delivery of care by increasing access, reducing the frequency of in-person visits, and improving the overall efficiency of the health care system following a major surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋关节和膝关节骨性关节炎患者虚拟表现测量的有效性和敏感性:纵向研究。
背景:在2020年COVID-19大流行之后,需要采用不同的医疗保健利用方法来提高安全性和效率。在大流行后时代,对肌肉骨骼疾病的虚拟护理和远程评估变得更加普遍,检查这些远程接触的准确性仍然至关重要。2023年,一种创新的基于视频的工具——虚拟性能测量(VPM)被引入,用于评估膝关节骨关节炎患者的功能困难。进一步验证这一工具是必要的,以扩大其应用纵向和更多样化的人群。目的:本研究考察了VPM(一种基于数字的结果工具)在髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎患者中接受关节置换术的纵向有效性。方法:在手术前和手术后约3-5个月,患者在观看了40个视频后完成了一项基于网络的调查,这些视频展示了10项难度越来越大的功能任务。以下肢功能量表(LEFS)作为参考指标。评估纵向收敛效度和已知组效度以及对变化的敏感性。结果:120例患者(n=80,女性67%;平均年龄67岁,SD 9岁;N =58,髋关节骨关节炎患者占48%,N =62,膝关节骨关节炎患者占52%。结论:VPM在髋关节和膝关节骨性关节炎患者关节置换术后表现出足够的纵向收敛和已知组效度以及对变化的敏感性。该工具有可能通过增加可及性、减少亲自就诊频率和提高大手术后卫生保健系统的整体效率来改善医疗服务的提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Screening by Health Care Systems for Barriers to Patient Engagement With Digital Health Care: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Patient-Centered Education Through A Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) for Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Caregivers: Descriptive Study of Knowledge Gains by French Association of Patients With Multiple Myeloma (AF3M) and French-Speaking Myeloma Intergroup (IFM). Stratified Causal Inference for Intensive Care Unit Risk Prediction: Informatics-Based Modeling of Anesthetic Drug Combinations. TikTok as a Platform for Patient Education and Health Information in Rare Genetic Diseases: Cross-Sectional Study. Biosurveillance and the Opioid Crisis in Emergency Medicine: Qualitative Study of Physician Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1