Leveraging Machine Learning for Heat Transfer Coefficient Estimation in Gas–Liquid and Gas–Liquid–Solid Bubble Columns

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04741
Chinmay Patil, Sumit Hazare, Vivek Vitankar, Aniruddha J. Joshi, Ashwin Wasudeo Patwardhan, Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi
{"title":"Leveraging Machine Learning for Heat Transfer Coefficient Estimation in Gas–Liquid and Gas–Liquid–Solid Bubble Columns","authors":"Chinmay Patil, Sumit Hazare, Vivek Vitankar, Aniruddha J. Joshi, Ashwin Wasudeo Patwardhan, Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a precise design of the bubble column, it is crucial to accurately estimate design parameters, such as heat and mass transfer coefficient. The heat transfer coefficient in the bubble column or slurry bubble column can be calculated by empirical or semiempirical correlations. These correlations fail to correlate the multidimensional nature of the data and lack generalization, whereas machine learning (ML) models have the advantage of doing the same. Most of the correlations in the existing literature are for gas–liquid bubble columns. In the present study, a regressive ML model for the estimation of the heat transfer coefficient for gas–liquid as well as gas–liquid–solid bubble columns was developed on published experimental data. Three different ML methods, artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF), and support vector regression (SVR), were used to train the data set. Models were trained on the data set with individual parameters and dimensionless numbers. The data set consists of 962 data points with individual features such as column diameter, height of clear liquid, sparger type, sparger hole diameter, % free area, pressure, temperature, superficial gas and liquid velocity, gas density, mixture density, viscosity, specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity, surface tension, particle diameter, and heat transfer measurement location. The present study shows that SVR trained on dimensionless numbers performed better than SVR, RF, and ANN trained on individual parameters and RF and ANN trained on dimensionless numbers. The overall mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, and number of outliers for the SVR model were 8.42%, 0.983, and 85 outliers out of 962 data points, respectively. The SVR model trained with dimensionless numbers could predict the effects of pressure and particle concentration.","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For a precise design of the bubble column, it is crucial to accurately estimate design parameters, such as heat and mass transfer coefficient. The heat transfer coefficient in the bubble column or slurry bubble column can be calculated by empirical or semiempirical correlations. These correlations fail to correlate the multidimensional nature of the data and lack generalization, whereas machine learning (ML) models have the advantage of doing the same. Most of the correlations in the existing literature are for gas–liquid bubble columns. In the present study, a regressive ML model for the estimation of the heat transfer coefficient for gas–liquid as well as gas–liquid–solid bubble columns was developed on published experimental data. Three different ML methods, artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF), and support vector regression (SVR), were used to train the data set. Models were trained on the data set with individual parameters and dimensionless numbers. The data set consists of 962 data points with individual features such as column diameter, height of clear liquid, sparger type, sparger hole diameter, % free area, pressure, temperature, superficial gas and liquid velocity, gas density, mixture density, viscosity, specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity, surface tension, particle diameter, and heat transfer measurement location. The present study shows that SVR trained on dimensionless numbers performed better than SVR, RF, and ANN trained on individual parameters and RF and ANN trained on dimensionless numbers. The overall mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), R2, and number of outliers for the SVR model were 8.42%, 0.983, and 85 outliers out of 962 data points, respectively. The SVR model trained with dimensionless numbers could predict the effects of pressure and particle concentration.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习估计气-液和气-液-固气泡柱的传热系数
对于气泡塔的精确设计,准确估计传热传质系数等设计参数是至关重要的。泡塔或浆体泡塔内的换热系数可用经验或半经验关系式计算。这些相关性无法将数据的多维性质联系起来,并且缺乏泛化,而机器学习(ML)模型具有同样的优势。现有文献中大多数的相关性是针对气液泡柱的。在本研究中,基于已发表的实验数据,建立了估计气-液和气-液-固两种气泡塔传热系数的回归ML模型。使用人工神经网络(ANN)、随机森林(RF)和支持向量回归(SVR)三种不同的机器学习方法来训练数据集。模型在具有单个参数和无量纲数字的数据集上进行训练。该数据集由962个数据点组成,具有独立的特征,如柱径、清液高度、喷雾器类型、喷雾器孔径、自由面积%、压力、温度、表面气液速度、气体密度、混合物密度、粘度、比热容和导热系数、表面张力、颗粒直径和传热测量位置。本研究表明,在无量纲数上训练的SVR比在单个参数上训练的SVR、RF和ANN以及在无量纲数上训练的RF和ANN表现得更好。在962个数点中,SVR模型的总体平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为8.42%,R2为0.983,异常点数为85。用无因次数训练的SVR模型可以预测压力和颗粒浓度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.
期刊最新文献
Ni/MWCNT-GNP for Clean Hydrogen Via Catalytic NH3 Decomposition: The Importance of Desorption Kinetics Achieving High NH3 Conversion Interfacial Engineering of Thin-Film Composite Membranes with Polyoxometalates as Salt Additives for High-Efficiency Forward Osmosis Utilizing Titanium–Vanadium Coprecipitation for the Preparation of High-Performance Sodium Vanadium Phosphate Cathode Materials from Low-Purity Vanadium Sources Enhancing CO2/CH4 Separation for Biogas Upgrading Using MOF-303/MWCNTs-COOH Composite Kinetic and Characterization Analysis on Mercury Adsorption by Magnetic Biochar in Flue Gas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1