Bird richness as a mediator between greenspace and mental health relationships

IF 9.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105360
Sihao Chen , Huaqing Wang , Wenyan Xu
{"title":"Bird richness as a mediator between greenspace and mental health relationships","authors":"Sihao Chen ,&nbsp;Huaqing Wang ,&nbsp;Wenyan Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Neighborhood greenspaces are widely known to benefit bird diversity and human mental health. However, whether bird richness mediates the relationship between greenspace and mental health is unknown. We ascertain such mediation effects in 294 census tracts in Los Angeles City. We obtained greenspace data from one-meter resolution satellite imagery, bird species data from eBird citizen science datasets, and prevalence of poor mental health from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mediation analysis combined with spatial error models was used to assess the mediating effects while controlling for geographic, demographic, and socio-economic factors. We found that the higher greenspace percentage was associated with increased bird richness (β = 0.188, p &lt; 0.001), and such bird richness was associated with reduced prevalence of poor mental health (β =  − 0.020, p = 0.010). The bird richness partially mediated the relationship between the greenspace percentage and the prevalence of poor mental health, as evidenced by a decrease in coefficient efficiency from − 0.020 to − 0.017. Our findings underscore the need for public health policymakers, landscape architects, and greenspace managers to consider biodiversity-friendly strategies in the design of urban greenspaces to enhance both wildlife habitats and human mental health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 105360"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625000672","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neighborhood greenspaces are widely known to benefit bird diversity and human mental health. However, whether bird richness mediates the relationship between greenspace and mental health is unknown. We ascertain such mediation effects in 294 census tracts in Los Angeles City. We obtained greenspace data from one-meter resolution satellite imagery, bird species data from eBird citizen science datasets, and prevalence of poor mental health from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mediation analysis combined with spatial error models was used to assess the mediating effects while controlling for geographic, demographic, and socio-economic factors. We found that the higher greenspace percentage was associated with increased bird richness (β = 0.188, p < 0.001), and such bird richness was associated with reduced prevalence of poor mental health (β =  − 0.020, p = 0.010). The bird richness partially mediated the relationship between the greenspace percentage and the prevalence of poor mental health, as evidenced by a decrease in coefficient efficiency from − 0.020 to − 0.017. Our findings underscore the need for public health policymakers, landscape architects, and greenspace managers to consider biodiversity-friendly strategies in the design of urban greenspaces to enhance both wildlife habitats and human mental health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鸟类丰富度在绿地与心理健康关系中的中介作用
众所周知,社区绿地有利于鸟类多样性和人类心理健康。然而,鸟类丰富度是否介导绿地与心理健康之间的关系尚不清楚。我们在洛杉矶的294个人口普查区确定了这种中介效应。我们从一米分辨率的卫星图像中获得了绿地数据,从eBird公民科学数据集中获得了鸟类物种数据,从美国疾病控制与预防中心获得了精神健康状况不佳的患病率。在控制地理、人口和社会经济因素的情况下,采用结合空间误差模型的中介分析来评估中介效应。研究发现,绿地比例越高,鸟类丰富度越高(β = 0.188, p <;0.001),而且这种鸟类丰富度与心理健康不良患病率降低相关(β = - 0.020, p = 0.010)。鸟类丰富度部分中介了绿地百分比与心理健康不良患病率之间的关系,效率系数从- 0.020下降到- 0.017。我们的研究结果强调了公共卫生政策制定者、景观设计师和绿地管理者在设计城市绿地时考虑生物多样性友好策略的必要性,以增强野生动物栖息地和人类心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
期刊最新文献
The divergent environmental trajectories of formerly redlined communities: a time series analysis of green investment in Chicago Seeing green, staying longer? A causal analysis of visual green exposure and urban park engagement using mobility and panoramas data Concomitant exposure to residential greenness, nitrogen dioxide, and outdoor light at night in association with incident anxiety Associations between depression severity and urban built and natural environments: An analysis of nationally representative data from China Towards spatial equality in China’s protected area system: An assessment framework integrating accessibility and availability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1