Early mobilisation in patients with shock and receiving vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Medicina Intensiva Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.medin.2024.09.002
Henry Mauricio Parada-Gereda , Luis F. Pardo-Cocuy , Janneth Milena Avendaño , Daniel Molano-Franco , Joan Ramón Masclans
{"title":"Early mobilisation in patients with shock and receiving vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies","authors":"Henry Mauricio Parada-Gereda ,&nbsp;Luis F. Pardo-Cocuy ,&nbsp;Janneth Milena Avendaño ,&nbsp;Daniel Molano-Franco ,&nbsp;Joan Ramón Masclans","doi":"10.1016/j.medin.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and safety of early mobilisation in patients with shock requiring vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Intensive care unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Patients or participants</h3><div>Adult patients requiring vasoactive drugs who received early mobilisation in the intensive care unit.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted using the databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Medline Ovid, Science Direct, and CINAHL, including observational studies involving adult patients requiring vasoactive drugs who received early mobilisation. A meta-analysis was performed on the proportion of safety events and the proportion of early mobilisation in patients with high, moderate, and low doses of vasoactive drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>Feasibility, safety events, and the maximum level of activity achieved during early mobilisation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search yielded 1875 studies, of which 8 were included in the systematic review and 5 in the meta-analysis. The results showed that 64% (95% CI: 34%–95%, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) of patients were mobilised with low doses of vasoactive drugs, 30% (95% CI: 7%–53%, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) with moderate doses, and 7% (95% CI: 3%–16%, p 0.17) with high doses. The proportion of adverse events was low, at 2% (95% CI: 1%–4%, p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Early mobilisation in patients with shock and the need for vasoactive drugs is feasible and generally safe. However, there is an emphasis on the need for further high-quality research to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49268,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Intensiva","volume":"49 4","pages":"Pages 193-204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S021056912400319X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and safety of early mobilisation in patients with shock requiring vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting

Intensive care unit (ICU).

Patients or participants

Adult patients requiring vasoactive drugs who received early mobilisation in the intensive care unit.

Interventions

A systematic search was conducted using the databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Medline Ovid, Science Direct, and CINAHL, including observational studies involving adult patients requiring vasoactive drugs who received early mobilisation. A meta-analysis was performed on the proportion of safety events and the proportion of early mobilisation in patients with high, moderate, and low doses of vasoactive drugs.

Main variables of interest

Feasibility, safety events, and the maximum level of activity achieved during early mobilisation.

Results

The search yielded 1875 studies, of which 8 were included in the systematic review and 5 in the meta-analysis. The results showed that 64% (95% CI: 34%–95%, p < 0.05) of patients were mobilised with low doses of vasoactive drugs, 30% (95% CI: 7%–53%, p < 0.05) with moderate doses, and 7% (95% CI: 3%–16%, p 0.17) with high doses. The proportion of adverse events was low, at 2% (95% CI: 1%–4%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Early mobilisation in patients with shock and the need for vasoactive drugs is feasible and generally safe. However, there is an emphasis on the need for further high-quality research to confirm these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在重症监护室接受血管活性药物治疗的休克患者的早期活动:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的本研究旨在评估重症监护病房(ICU)需要血管活性药物的休克患者早期活动的可行性和安全性。设计系统回顾和荟萃分析。重症监护病房(ICU)。患者或参与者在重症监护室接受早期动员的需要血管活性药物的成年患者。干预:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Medline Ovid、Science Direct和CINAHL数据库,包括需要血管活性药物且接受早期动员的成年患者的观察性研究。对高、中、低剂量血管活性药物患者的安全事件比例和早期活动比例进行了荟萃分析。主要感兴趣的变量可行性、安全事件和早期动员期间达到的最大活动水平。结果共检索到1875项研究,其中8项纳入系统评价,5项纳入荟萃分析。结果显示,64% (95% CI: 34%-95%, p <;0.05)的患者使用低剂量血管活性药物,30% (95% CI: 7%-53%, p <;中剂量组为0.05),高剂量组为7% (95% CI: 3%-16%, p 0.17)。不良事件的比例较低,为2% (95% CI: 1%-4%, p <;0.05)。结论休克患者早期活动和使用血管活性药物是可行且安全的。然而,人们强调需要进一步的高质量研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Intensiva
Medicina Intensiva CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Medicina Intensiva is the journal of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) and of Pan American and Iberian Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Medicina Intensiva has become the reference publication in Spanish in its field. The journal mainly publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Clinical Notes, Consensus Documents, Images, and other information relevant to the specialty. All works go through a rigorous selection process. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages. The journal follows the publication requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Validez de la escala FRAIL-España en pacientes críticos Factores determinantes en la decisión de ingreso de pacientes oncológicos en la unidad de cuidados intensivos: estudio español prospectivo multicéntrico Association between time weighted average mechanical power normalized to compliance and prognosis of critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC-IV database Neutrophil CD64 as a prognostic biomarker for mortality in sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Síndrome de liberación de citocinas y síndrome hemofagocítico asociados a inmunoterapia: una revisión narrativa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1