Bishwo Babu Shrestha , Babu Ram Lamichhane , Rajan Amin
{"title":"Population size, density, and ranging behaviour of a key leopard population in Nepal","authors":"Bishwo Babu Shrestha , Babu Ram Lamichhane , Rajan Amin","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, leopards are the most widespread large felid. However, mounting anthropogenic threats are rapidly reducing viable leopard populations and their range. Despite the clear pressures facing this species, there is a dearth of reliable population estimates for leopards across their range, which is particularly important in landscapes consisting of protected and non-protected areas. We used leopard data obtained from camera trap surveys in 2013, 2018 and 2022 to estimate population abundance and density using robust spatial capture-recapture models in a major carnivore site in Nepal. Leopard population in Chitwan National Park, its buffer zone and adjoining forests was estimated 107 (95 % CI: 81–144) with density 3.95 (95 % CI: 2.76–5.2) leopards per 100 km<sup>2</sup> in 2022. We documented stable leopard population with a slight decline from 58 (37–77) in 2013 to 48 (34–66) in 2022 in the park. Competition with increasing tiger numbers is a likely consequence for leopards and other carnivores in the protected area. Lower prey density, human-carnivore conflict through livestock depredation, and canine distemper virus with a large domestic dog population are major threats to leopards outside the park. To reduce these threats, we suggest that conflict mitigation measures be intensified, and the impact of disease on large carnivores quantified in this important carnivore landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 126920"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125000974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Globally, leopards are the most widespread large felid. However, mounting anthropogenic threats are rapidly reducing viable leopard populations and their range. Despite the clear pressures facing this species, there is a dearth of reliable population estimates for leopards across their range, which is particularly important in landscapes consisting of protected and non-protected areas. We used leopard data obtained from camera trap surveys in 2013, 2018 and 2022 to estimate population abundance and density using robust spatial capture-recapture models in a major carnivore site in Nepal. Leopard population in Chitwan National Park, its buffer zone and adjoining forests was estimated 107 (95 % CI: 81–144) with density 3.95 (95 % CI: 2.76–5.2) leopards per 100 km2 in 2022. We documented stable leopard population with a slight decline from 58 (37–77) in 2013 to 48 (34–66) in 2022 in the park. Competition with increasing tiger numbers is a likely consequence for leopards and other carnivores in the protected area. Lower prey density, human-carnivore conflict through livestock depredation, and canine distemper virus with a large domestic dog population are major threats to leopards outside the park. To reduce these threats, we suggest that conflict mitigation measures be intensified, and the impact of disease on large carnivores quantified in this important carnivore landscape.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.