Optimizing multinational manufacturing supply chains under diverse carbon policies using carbon gaming

Yifan Xin , Ismail M. Ali , Yangyan Shi , Daryl L. Essam , Ripon K. Chakrabortty
{"title":"Optimizing multinational manufacturing supply chains under diverse carbon policies using carbon gaming","authors":"Yifan Xin ,&nbsp;Ismail M. Ali ,&nbsp;Yangyan Shi ,&nbsp;Daryl L. Essam ,&nbsp;Ripon K. Chakrabortty","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In response to the environmental impact of human activities, governments worldwide have introduced various carbon policies. However, decision-making for multinational companies with different carbon policies has become a challenge for global supply chains (GSCs). To address the gap in the literature on the equitable allocation of carbon allowances and the operational management of GSCs under heterogeneous regulations, we propose a two-stage framework. First, we introduce the “Carbon Game”—a multiplayer Nash framework with a bi-level nested structure, where asymmetric manufacturers strategically determine their pricing, production, and carbon allowance allocation under diverse carbon taxes and subsidies. We then embed these equilibrium strategies into a multi-objective mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model to optimize GSC decisions, including fleet composition and network configuration. By integrating game-theoretic principles with multi-objective optimization, our framework provides new management insights. Numerical experiments show that carbon-efficient manufacturers should prioritize green technology investments to consolidate their advantage and use carbon labelling to capture environmentally conscious markets, while carbon-inefficient manufacturers should focus on cost-saving strategies, delaying green investments under stringent policies such as high taxes or low subsidies. Carbon-efficient manufacturers are also more responsive to policy changes. From a policy perspective, while both carbon taxes and subsidies generally incentivize green technology adoption, subsidies prove more effective and result in greater emission reductions. Across all tested scenarios, our method achieves a 15.07% profit increase and a 1.77% emission reduction compared to the Grandfathering approach. These findings inform multinational firms’ competitive strategies and help policymakers balance subsidies and taxes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 104091"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525001322","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the environmental impact of human activities, governments worldwide have introduced various carbon policies. However, decision-making for multinational companies with different carbon policies has become a challenge for global supply chains (GSCs). To address the gap in the literature on the equitable allocation of carbon allowances and the operational management of GSCs under heterogeneous regulations, we propose a two-stage framework. First, we introduce the “Carbon Game”—a multiplayer Nash framework with a bi-level nested structure, where asymmetric manufacturers strategically determine their pricing, production, and carbon allowance allocation under diverse carbon taxes and subsidies. We then embed these equilibrium strategies into a multi-objective mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model to optimize GSC decisions, including fleet composition and network configuration. By integrating game-theoretic principles with multi-objective optimization, our framework provides new management insights. Numerical experiments show that carbon-efficient manufacturers should prioritize green technology investments to consolidate their advantage and use carbon labelling to capture environmentally conscious markets, while carbon-inefficient manufacturers should focus on cost-saving strategies, delaying green investments under stringent policies such as high taxes or low subsidies. Carbon-efficient manufacturers are also more responsive to policy changes. From a policy perspective, while both carbon taxes and subsidies generally incentivize green technology adoption, subsidies prove more effective and result in greater emission reductions. Across all tested scenarios, our method achieves a 15.07% profit increase and a 1.77% emission reduction compared to the Grandfathering approach. These findings inform multinational firms’ competitive strategies and help policymakers balance subsidies and taxes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用碳博弈优化多元碳政策下的跨国制造业供应链
为了应对人类活动对环境的影响,世界各国政府都出台了各种碳政策。然而,跨国公司不同的碳政策已经成为全球供应链(gsc)的挑战。为了解决文献中关于碳配额公平分配和异质监管下GSCs运营管理的空白,我们提出了一个两阶段框架。首先,我们引入了“碳博弈”——一个具有双层嵌套结构的多人纳什框架,其中不对称制造商在不同的碳税和补贴下策略性地决定其定价、生产和碳配额分配。然后,我们将这些均衡策略嵌入到多目标混合整数线性规划(MILP)模型中,以优化GSC决策,包括车队组成和网络配置。通过将博弈论原理与多目标优化相结合,我们的框架提供了新的管理见解。数值实验表明,碳效率高的制造商应优先考虑绿色技术投资,以巩固其优势,并使用碳标签来占领环保意识强的市场,而碳效率低的制造商应侧重于节省成本的战略,推迟在高税收或低补贴等严格政策下的绿色投资。低碳制造商对政策变化的反应也更灵敏。从政策角度来看,虽然碳税和补贴通常都能激励绿色技术的采用,但补贴证明更有效,并能带来更大的减排。在所有测试场景中,与祖父方法相比,我们的方法实现了15.07%的利润增长和1.77%的减排。这些发现为跨国公司的竞争战略提供了信息,并有助于政策制定者平衡补贴和税收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Who should invest in EV charging infrastructure? Policy design under ZEV mandates Deep reinforcement learning for the vehicle routing problem with route balancing Climate shock impacts on supply chains: the case of the truckload spot market Service network design for electric vehicles with combined battery swapping and recharging An integrated framework of vessel demand shifting and port capacity utilization for congestion mitigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1