Yifan Xin , Ismail M. Ali , Yangyan Shi , Daryl L. Essam , Ripon K. Chakrabortty
{"title":"Optimizing multinational manufacturing supply chains under diverse carbon policies using carbon gaming","authors":"Yifan Xin , Ismail M. Ali , Yangyan Shi , Daryl L. Essam , Ripon K. Chakrabortty","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In response to the environmental impact of human activities, governments worldwide have introduced various carbon policies. However, decision-making for multinational companies with different carbon policies has become a challenge for global supply chains (GSCs). To address the gap in the literature on the equitable allocation of carbon allowances and the operational management of GSCs under heterogeneous regulations, we propose a two-stage framework. First, we introduce the “Carbon Game”—a multiplayer Nash framework with a bi-level nested structure, where asymmetric manufacturers strategically determine their pricing, production, and carbon allowance allocation under diverse carbon taxes and subsidies. We then embed these equilibrium strategies into a multi-objective mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model to optimize GSC decisions, including fleet composition and network configuration. By integrating game-theoretic principles with multi-objective optimization, our framework provides new management insights. Numerical experiments show that carbon-efficient manufacturers should prioritize green technology investments to consolidate their advantage and use carbon labelling to capture environmentally conscious markets, while carbon-inefficient manufacturers should focus on cost-saving strategies, delaying green investments under stringent policies such as high taxes or low subsidies. Carbon-efficient manufacturers are also more responsive to policy changes. From a policy perspective, while both carbon taxes and subsidies generally incentivize green technology adoption, subsidies prove more effective and result in greater emission reductions. Across all tested scenarios, our method achieves a 15.07% profit increase and a 1.77% emission reduction compared to the Grandfathering approach. These findings inform multinational firms’ competitive strategies and help policymakers balance subsidies and taxes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 104091"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525001322","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In response to the environmental impact of human activities, governments worldwide have introduced various carbon policies. However, decision-making for multinational companies with different carbon policies has become a challenge for global supply chains (GSCs). To address the gap in the literature on the equitable allocation of carbon allowances and the operational management of GSCs under heterogeneous regulations, we propose a two-stage framework. First, we introduce the “Carbon Game”—a multiplayer Nash framework with a bi-level nested structure, where asymmetric manufacturers strategically determine their pricing, production, and carbon allowance allocation under diverse carbon taxes and subsidies. We then embed these equilibrium strategies into a multi-objective mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model to optimize GSC decisions, including fleet composition and network configuration. By integrating game-theoretic principles with multi-objective optimization, our framework provides new management insights. Numerical experiments show that carbon-efficient manufacturers should prioritize green technology investments to consolidate their advantage and use carbon labelling to capture environmentally conscious markets, while carbon-inefficient manufacturers should focus on cost-saving strategies, delaying green investments under stringent policies such as high taxes or low subsidies. Carbon-efficient manufacturers are also more responsive to policy changes. From a policy perspective, while both carbon taxes and subsidies generally incentivize green technology adoption, subsidies prove more effective and result in greater emission reductions. Across all tested scenarios, our method achieves a 15.07% profit increase and a 1.77% emission reduction compared to the Grandfathering approach. These findings inform multinational firms’ competitive strategies and help policymakers balance subsidies and taxes.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.