Distributionally robust production and pricing for risk-averse contract-farming supply chains with uncertain demand and yield

Guomin Xing , Yuanguang Zhong , Yong-Wu Zhou , Bin Cao
{"title":"Distributionally robust production and pricing for risk-averse contract-farming supply chains with uncertain demand and yield","authors":"Guomin Xing ,&nbsp;Yuanguang Zhong ,&nbsp;Yong-Wu Zhou ,&nbsp;Bin Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contract farming is a common and emerging practice in agricultural supply chains in both developing and developed countries, yet it has not received much attention in prior studies. This paper addresses this gap by examining a risk- and ambiguity-averse contract farming supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral agribusiness manufacturer and a risk-averse smallholder farmer, under conditions of demand and yield randomness with limited distributional information. A distributionally robust Stackelberg game model is developed to tackle this challenging manufacturer-farmer ambiguity problem. The model enables us to determine the risk-averse farmer’s robust production quantity under the conditional value-at-risk criterion, as well as the agribusiness manufacturer’s robust procurement price, which follows a simple threshold policy. Our analysis reveals that there exists a threshold level of risk aversion beyond which the farmer would decline the contract and cease production altogether. Furthermore, we find that the farmer’s risk-averse behavior adversely impacts both parties, even in the worst-case scenario, resulting in lower profits and reduced production quantities for both. Surprisingly, our comparative analysis shows that higher demand variability benefits the risk-averse farmer, creating a win-lose outcome for the farmer and the manufacturer. In contrast, higher yield uncertainty leads to a lose-lose outcome for both parties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 104074"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525001152","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contract farming is a common and emerging practice in agricultural supply chains in both developing and developed countries, yet it has not received much attention in prior studies. This paper addresses this gap by examining a risk- and ambiguity-averse contract farming supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral agribusiness manufacturer and a risk-averse smallholder farmer, under conditions of demand and yield randomness with limited distributional information. A distributionally robust Stackelberg game model is developed to tackle this challenging manufacturer-farmer ambiguity problem. The model enables us to determine the risk-averse farmer’s robust production quantity under the conditional value-at-risk criterion, as well as the agribusiness manufacturer’s robust procurement price, which follows a simple threshold policy. Our analysis reveals that there exists a threshold level of risk aversion beyond which the farmer would decline the contract and cease production altogether. Furthermore, we find that the farmer’s risk-averse behavior adversely impacts both parties, even in the worst-case scenario, resulting in lower profits and reduced production quantities for both. Surprisingly, our comparative analysis shows that higher demand variability benefits the risk-averse farmer, creating a win-lose outcome for the farmer and the manufacturer. In contrast, higher yield uncertainty leads to a lose-lose outcome for both parties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需求和收益不确定的风险规避型合同农业供应链的分布稳健生产和定价
契约农业在发展中国家和发达国家的农业供应链中都是一种常见的新兴做法,但在以往的研究中并没有得到太多的关注。本文通过研究在需求和产量随机且分配信息有限的条件下,由风险中性的农业综合企业制造商和风险厌恶的小农组成的风险和模糊性厌恶的合同农业供应链来解决这一差距。提出了一种分布式鲁棒Stackelberg博弈模型来解决这一具有挑战性的制造商-农民模糊问题。该模型使我们能够确定风险厌恶农民在条件风险价值标准下的稳健产量,以及农业综合企业制造商遵循简单门槛政策的稳健采购价格。我们的分析表明,存在一个风险厌恶阈值水平,超过该阈值,农民将拒绝合同并完全停止生产。此外,我们发现即使在最坏的情况下,农民的风险厌恶行为也会对双方产生不利影响,导致双方的利润下降和产量减少。令人惊讶的是,我们的比较分析表明,较高的需求变异性有利于规避风险的农民,为农民和制造商创造了一个双赢的结果。相反,更高的收益率不确定性会导致双方双输的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Who should invest in EV charging infrastructure? Policy design under ZEV mandates Deep reinforcement learning for the vehicle routing problem with route balancing Climate shock impacts on supply chains: the case of the truckload spot market Service network design for electric vehicles with combined battery swapping and recharging An integrated framework of vessel demand shifting and port capacity utilization for congestion mitigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1