Guomin Xing , Yuanguang Zhong , Yong-Wu Zhou , Bin Cao
{"title":"Distributionally robust production and pricing for risk-averse contract-farming supply chains with uncertain demand and yield","authors":"Guomin Xing , Yuanguang Zhong , Yong-Wu Zhou , Bin Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contract farming is a common and emerging practice in agricultural supply chains in both developing and developed countries, yet it has not received much attention in prior studies. This paper addresses this gap by examining a risk- and ambiguity-averse contract farming supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral agribusiness manufacturer and a risk-averse smallholder farmer, under conditions of demand and yield randomness with limited distributional information. A distributionally robust Stackelberg game model is developed to tackle this challenging manufacturer-farmer ambiguity problem. The model enables us to determine the risk-averse farmer’s robust production quantity under the conditional value-at-risk criterion, as well as the agribusiness manufacturer’s robust procurement price, which follows a simple threshold policy. Our analysis reveals that there exists a threshold level of risk aversion beyond which the farmer would decline the contract and cease production altogether. Furthermore, we find that the farmer’s risk-averse behavior adversely impacts both parties, even in the worst-case scenario, resulting in lower profits and reduced production quantities for both. Surprisingly, our comparative analysis shows that higher demand variability benefits the risk-averse farmer, creating a win-lose outcome for the farmer and the manufacturer. In contrast, higher yield uncertainty leads to a lose-lose outcome for both parties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 104074"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525001152","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Contract farming is a common and emerging practice in agricultural supply chains in both developing and developed countries, yet it has not received much attention in prior studies. This paper addresses this gap by examining a risk- and ambiguity-averse contract farming supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral agribusiness manufacturer and a risk-averse smallholder farmer, under conditions of demand and yield randomness with limited distributional information. A distributionally robust Stackelberg game model is developed to tackle this challenging manufacturer-farmer ambiguity problem. The model enables us to determine the risk-averse farmer’s robust production quantity under the conditional value-at-risk criterion, as well as the agribusiness manufacturer’s robust procurement price, which follows a simple threshold policy. Our analysis reveals that there exists a threshold level of risk aversion beyond which the farmer would decline the contract and cease production altogether. Furthermore, we find that the farmer’s risk-averse behavior adversely impacts both parties, even in the worst-case scenario, resulting in lower profits and reduced production quantities for both. Surprisingly, our comparative analysis shows that higher demand variability benefits the risk-averse farmer, creating a win-lose outcome for the farmer and the manufacturer. In contrast, higher yield uncertainty leads to a lose-lose outcome for both parties.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.