Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: a contemporary, nationwide perspective.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325321
Amar Taha, Alice David, Sigurdur Ragnarsson, Piotr Szamlewski, Shabbar Jamaly, Jan Gustav Smith, Susanne J Nielsen, Anders Jeppsson, Andreas Martinsson
{"title":"Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: a contemporary, nationwide perspective.","authors":"Amar Taha, Alice David, Sigurdur Ragnarsson, Piotr Szamlewski, Shabbar Jamaly, Jan Gustav Smith, Susanne J Nielsen, Anders Jeppsson, Andreas Martinsson","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac surgery carries a heightened risk of bradyarrhythmias, but current permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation estimates rely on non-contemporary studies. This study primarily aimed to explore the incidence and indications for PPM implantation at 30 days and 1 year after different cardiac surgical procedures in a modern cohort. Secondary outcomes were PPM incidence at 10 years and time from cardiac surgery to PPM implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide population-based study included all patients in Sweden who from 2006 to 2020 underwent first-time coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valvular surgery. Patients with previous PPM, previous or later implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and those who underwent heart transplantation were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 76 447 patients were included, out of which 8.2% (n=6271) received a PPM. The cumulative incidence of PPM implantation was 2.9%, 3.8% and 9.5% at 30 days, 1 year and 10 years following cardiac surgery, respectively. The main PPM indication was atrioventricular block. Tricuspid valve surgery exhibited the highest cumulative incidence for PPM both at 30 days (6.8%, 95% CI 4.3% to 10.0%) and 1 year (8.8%, 95% CI 6.0% to 12.0%) surpassing mitral valve surgery (30 day 5.3%, 95% CI 4.7% to 6.0%; 1 year 6.5%, 95% CI 5.8% to 7.3%), aortic valve surgery (30 day 4.8%, 95% CI 4.5% to 5.1%; 1 year 6.0%, 95% CI 5.6% to 6.3%) and CABG (30 day 0.74%, 95% CI 0.6% to 0.8%; 1 year 1.3%, 95% CI 1.2% to 1.3%). The incidence following combined operations (multiple valves and/or CABG) was 6.5% (95% CI 6.0% to 6.9%) and 8.1% (95% CI 7.7% to 8.6%) at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. Concomitant ablation surgery increased the risk even further (adjusted HR 9.2, 95% CI 7.9 to 10.6; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The need for PPM after cardiac surgery is substantial, primarily due to atrioventricular block. Tricuspid valve surgery is associated with the highest risk for PPM among isolated procedures. Combined procedures and concomitant surgical ablation further increase that risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":"1036-1042"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12573347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac surgery carries a heightened risk of bradyarrhythmias, but current permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation estimates rely on non-contemporary studies. This study primarily aimed to explore the incidence and indications for PPM implantation at 30 days and 1 year after different cardiac surgical procedures in a modern cohort. Secondary outcomes were PPM incidence at 10 years and time from cardiac surgery to PPM implantation.

Methods: This nationwide population-based study included all patients in Sweden who from 2006 to 2020 underwent first-time coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valvular surgery. Patients with previous PPM, previous or later implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and those who underwent heart transplantation were excluded.

Results: Overall, 76 447 patients were included, out of which 8.2% (n=6271) received a PPM. The cumulative incidence of PPM implantation was 2.9%, 3.8% and 9.5% at 30 days, 1 year and 10 years following cardiac surgery, respectively. The main PPM indication was atrioventricular block. Tricuspid valve surgery exhibited the highest cumulative incidence for PPM both at 30 days (6.8%, 95% CI 4.3% to 10.0%) and 1 year (8.8%, 95% CI 6.0% to 12.0%) surpassing mitral valve surgery (30 day 5.3%, 95% CI 4.7% to 6.0%; 1 year 6.5%, 95% CI 5.8% to 7.3%), aortic valve surgery (30 day 4.8%, 95% CI 4.5% to 5.1%; 1 year 6.0%, 95% CI 5.6% to 6.3%) and CABG (30 day 0.74%, 95% CI 0.6% to 0.8%; 1 year 1.3%, 95% CI 1.2% to 1.3%). The incidence following combined operations (multiple valves and/or CABG) was 6.5% (95% CI 6.0% to 6.9%) and 8.1% (95% CI 7.7% to 8.6%) at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. Concomitant ablation surgery increased the risk even further (adjusted HR 9.2, 95% CI 7.9 to 10.6; p<0.001).

Conclusions: The need for PPM after cardiac surgery is substantial, primarily due to atrioventricular block. Tricuspid valve surgery is associated with the highest risk for PPM among isolated procedures. Combined procedures and concomitant surgical ablation further increase that risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏手术后心脏起搏器植入:当代全国视角。
背景:心脏手术会增加发生缓慢性心律失常的风险,但目前对永久起搏器(PPM)植入的估计依赖于非现代研究。本研究的主要目的是在现代队列中探讨不同心脏外科手术后 30 天和 1 年的 PPM 植入发生率和适应症。次要结果是 10 年后的 PPM 发生率以及从心脏手术到 PPM 植入的时间:这项基于全国人口的研究纳入了 2006 年至 2020 年期间瑞典首次接受冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CABG) 和/或瓣膜手术的所有患者。既往接受过 PPM、既往或后来接受过植入式心律转复除颤器 (ICD) 的患者以及接受过心脏移植的患者均被排除在外:总共纳入了 76 447 名患者,其中 8.2% 的患者(n=6271)接受了 PPM。心脏手术后30天、1年和10年的PPM植入累积发生率分别为2.9%、3.8%和9.5%。PPM 的主要适应症是房室传导阻滞。三尖瓣手术后 30 天(6.8%,95% CI 4.3% 至 10.0%)和 1 年(8.8%,95% CI 6.0% 至 12.0%)的 PPM 累计发生率最高,超过二尖瓣手术(30 天 5.3%,95% CI 4.7% 至 6.0%;1 年为 6.5%,95% CI 为 5.8% 至 7.3%)、主动脉瓣手术(30 天为 4.8%,95% CI 为 4.5% 至 5.1%;1 年为 6.0%,95% CI 为 5.6% 至 6.3%)和 CABG(30 天为 0.74%,95% CI 为 0.6% 至 0.8%;1 年为 1.3%,95% CI 为 1.2% 至 1.3%)。联合手术(多瓣膜和/或 CABG)后,30 天和 1 年的发病率分别为 6.5%(95% CI 6.0% 至 6.9%)和 8.1%(95% CI 7.7% 至 8.6%)。同时进行消融手术会进一步增加风险(调整后 HR 为 9.2,95% CI 为 7.9 至 10.6;P 结论:心脏手术后需要大量的PPM,主要是由于房室传导阻滞。三尖瓣手术是单独手术中发生 PPM 风险最高的手术。联合手术和同时进行的手术消融进一步增加了这一风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart
Heart 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.
期刊最新文献
The day we made a patient: another case of a 'genotype-only' cardiomyopathy. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in contemporary cardiology: physiological insights, novel applications and evolving algorithms. Burden of chronic kidney disease and outcomes following hospitalisation for heart failure. Life expectancy and determinants of relative survival following surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Mechanical versus biological aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-70 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1