Prognostic implications of stress test-induced arrhythmias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-003133
Paul Y Lee, Juan Bello, Sarthak Patel, Rafael Toro-Manotas, Angelo Biviano, Elaine Wan, Hasan Garan, Jose Dizon, Matthew Yuyun, Hirad Yarmohammadi
{"title":"Prognostic implications of stress test-induced arrhythmias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Paul Y Lee, Juan Bello, Sarthak Patel, Rafael Toro-Manotas, Angelo Biviano, Elaine Wan, Hasan Garan, Jose Dizon, Matthew Yuyun, Hirad Yarmohammadi","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The significance of stress-test induced arrhythmias has been examined in prior studies, but there is no clear consensus regarding its significance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the significance of stress test-induced arrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies examining arrhythmia in both exercise and pharmacological stress testing were searched for in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases from inception to 14 June 2023. The primary outcomes of interest were mortality in ventricular and atrial arrhythmias, and later diagnosis of cardiac disease in atrial arrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of any ventricular arrhythmia during stress testing was significantly associated with mortality at all time points: OR 2.11 (95% CI 1.75, 2.54), p<0.00001. This association was still seen in the subgroup of healthy, asymptomatic patients: OR 2.22 (95% CI 1.45, 3.41), p=0.0003. Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) were associated with higher mortality compared with infrequent PVCs: OR 1.85 (95% CI 1.27, 2.69), p=0.001. The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) during stress testing was not associated with mortality at all time points: OR 1.53 (95% CI 0.05, 50.19), p=0.81. However, it was associated with later diagnosis of AF: OR 4.60 (95% CI 1.59, 13.26), p=0.005. The presence of atrial arrhythmias during stress testing at all time points was also associated with later diagnosis of coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction: OR 1.82 (95% CI 1.09, 3.03), p=0.02.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients experiencing ventricular arrhythmia during stress testing face double the odds of mortality compared with those without such arrhythmias. Atrial arrhythmia during stress testing, on the other hand, shows no association with mortality. However, it is linked to subsequent diagnosis of AF, coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The significance of stress-test induced arrhythmias has been examined in prior studies, but there is no clear consensus regarding its significance.

Objectives: To determine the significance of stress test-induced arrhythmias.

Methods: Relevant studies examining arrhythmia in both exercise and pharmacological stress testing were searched for in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases from inception to 14 June 2023. The primary outcomes of interest were mortality in ventricular and atrial arrhythmias, and later diagnosis of cardiac disease in atrial arrhythmias.

Results: The presence of any ventricular arrhythmia during stress testing was significantly associated with mortality at all time points: OR 2.11 (95% CI 1.75, 2.54), p<0.00001. This association was still seen in the subgroup of healthy, asymptomatic patients: OR 2.22 (95% CI 1.45, 3.41), p=0.0003. Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) were associated with higher mortality compared with infrequent PVCs: OR 1.85 (95% CI 1.27, 2.69), p=0.001. The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) during stress testing was not associated with mortality at all time points: OR 1.53 (95% CI 0.05, 50.19), p=0.81. However, it was associated with later diagnosis of AF: OR 4.60 (95% CI 1.59, 13.26), p=0.005. The presence of atrial arrhythmias during stress testing at all time points was also associated with later diagnosis of coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction: OR 1.82 (95% CI 1.09, 3.03), p=0.02.

Conclusions: Patients experiencing ventricular arrhythmia during stress testing face double the odds of mortality compared with those without such arrhythmias. Atrial arrhythmia during stress testing, on the other hand, shows no association with mortality. However, it is linked to subsequent diagnosis of AF, coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应激测试诱发心律失常的预后意义:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:压力测试诱发心律失常的重要性在以往的研究中已经得到了检验,但对其重要性并没有明确的共识。目的:探讨应激性心律失常的临床意义。方法:在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中检索从建立到2023年6月14日的运动和药物应激试验中检测心律失常的相关研究。研究的主要结局是室性和房性心律失常的死亡率,以及房性心律失常的心脏疾病的后期诊断。结果:压力测试期间任何室性心律失常的存在与所有时间点的死亡率显著相关:OR为2.11 (95% CI为1.75,2.54)。结论:在压力测试期间出现室性心律失常的患者的死亡率是无此类心律失常患者的两倍。另一方面,压力测试期间的心房心律失常与死亡率无关。然而,它与随后的房颤、冠状动脉疾病和心肌梗死的诊断有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Replacement fibrosis, left ventricular ejection fraction and sudden cardiac death in patients after myocardial infarction: a mediation analysis. From structural heart lesions to host burden: changing epidemiology and outcomes of native valve infective endocarditis, a nationwide study, 2006-2023. Post-COVID-19 era heart failure diagnosis and outcomes: adherence to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guidelines. Machine learning-based cardiovascular risk calculator for non-cardiac surgery. Diagnostic performance of the Myocardial-Ischaemic-Injury index machine-learning algorithm in patients with an initial indeterminate troponin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1