Efficacy of anaerobic digestion wastewater treatment systems in reducing antimicrobial resistance bacteria in wastewater from swine farms in Thailand.

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of water and health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.2166/wh.2025.323
Kanjana Changkaew, Manaporn Wongsoonthornchai, Bussarakam Thitanuwat, Ruchirada Changkwanyeun, Phashararat Yoogate
{"title":"Efficacy of anaerobic digestion wastewater treatment systems in reducing antimicrobial resistance bacteria in wastewater from swine farms in Thailand.","authors":"Kanjana Changkaew, Manaporn Wongsoonthornchai, Bussarakam Thitanuwat, Ruchirada Changkwanyeun, Phashararat Yoogate","doi":"10.2166/wh.2025.323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns among the fecal indicator bacteria and analyze the characteristics of wastewater from anaerobic digestion (AD) wastewater treatment systems in swine farms. Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. were identified by conventional and molecular methods. AMR profiles and wastewater quality were analyzed using standard methods. The results indicated that the primary resistances observed in <i>E. coli</i> were against AM, TE, SXT, and DO. Among Enterococcus spp., the highest resistance was noted for TE, followed by E, CIP, and NX. <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> showed the highest resistance to CIP, NX, and TE. Multidrug-resistant-<i>E. coli</i> and enterococci were 64.2 and 32.6%, respectively. Furthermore, CL-resistant E. coli and VA-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. were reported. Compared with influent, the proportion of AMR <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. in effluent was decreased. This decline suggested that AD effectively removed antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB). However, high influent biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, and chemical oxygen demand levels demonstrated significant pollution. Therefore, swine farms should prioritize waste management and regular maintenance of treatment systems to enhance the removal of ARB and pollutants. This study analyzed data from only three farms, highlighting the need for future research with a larger sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":17436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water and health","volume":"23 3","pages":"384-396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water and health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2025.323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns among the fecal indicator bacteria and analyze the characteristics of wastewater from anaerobic digestion (AD) wastewater treatment systems in swine farms. Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. were identified by conventional and molecular methods. AMR profiles and wastewater quality were analyzed using standard methods. The results indicated that the primary resistances observed in E. coli were against AM, TE, SXT, and DO. Among Enterococcus spp., the highest resistance was noted for TE, followed by E, CIP, and NX. Enterococcus faecium showed the highest resistance to CIP, NX, and TE. Multidrug-resistant-E. coli and enterococci were 64.2 and 32.6%, respectively. Furthermore, CL-resistant E. coli and VA-resistant Enterococcus spp. were reported. Compared with influent, the proportion of AMR E. coli and Enterococcus spp. in effluent was decreased. This decline suggested that AD effectively removed antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB). However, high influent biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, and chemical oxygen demand levels demonstrated significant pollution. Therefore, swine farms should prioritize waste management and regular maintenance of treatment systems to enhance the removal of ARB and pollutants. This study analyzed data from only three farms, highlighting the need for future research with a larger sample.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厌氧消化废水处理系统在减少泰国养猪场废水中抗菌素耐药性细菌方面的效果。
本研究旨在评价猪场厌氧消化(AD)废水处理系统粪便指示菌的抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)模式,并分析猪场厌氧消化(AD)废水处理系统的特点。采用常规方法和分子方法对大肠杆菌和肠球菌进行鉴定。采用标准方法分析AMR曲线和废水水质。结果表明,大肠杆菌主要对AM、TE、SXT和DO耐药。在肠球菌中,TE的耐药性最高,其次是E、CIP和NX。粪肠球菌对CIP、NX和TE的耐药性最高。Multidrug-resistant-E。大肠杆菌和肠球菌分别占64.2%和32.6%。此外,还报道了耐cl的大肠杆菌和耐va的肠球菌。与进水相比,出水中AMR大肠杆菌和肠球菌的比例降低。这种下降表明AD有效地去除了抗微生物细菌(ARB)。然而,高的进水生化需氧量、总悬浮固体和化学需氧量水平表明了严重的污染。因此,养猪场应优先考虑废物管理和定期维护处理系统,以加强对ARB和污染物的去除。这项研究只分析了三个农场的数据,强调了未来研究更大样本的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of water and health
Journal of water and health 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Water and Health is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of information on the health implications and control of waterborne microorganisms and chemical substances in the broadest sense for developing and developed countries worldwide. This is to include microbial toxins, chemical quality and the aesthetic qualities of water.
期刊最新文献
Recurrent outbreaks of cholera in Nigeria: a narrative review on the role of conflict and climate change. Climate change and water-related diseases: a bibliometric, knowledge map, topic modeling, and content analysis. Identification and characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from the surface water of the Laramie River, Wyoming. Silver tungstate/magnesium oxide nanocomposite as a high-performance adsorbent for bromide removal from aqueous systems. Case-control study of water and agricultural exposures among women in CKDu-endemic Sri Lanka.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1