A comparison and AGREE II analysis of the revised Society for Vascular Surgery/American Venous Forum/American Vein and Lymphatic Society and European Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines in the management of varicose veins
Alexandra Tedesco MD , Thomas F. O’Donnell MD , Isaac Gendelman MD , Payam Salehi MD, PhD
{"title":"A comparison and AGREE II analysis of the revised Society for Vascular Surgery/American Venous Forum/American Vein and Lymphatic Society and European Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines in the management of varicose veins","authors":"Alexandra Tedesco MD , Thomas F. O’Donnell MD , Isaac Gendelman MD , Payam Salehi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsv.2025.102238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to compare the Society for Vascular Surgery/American Venous Forum/American Vein and Lymphatic Society (SVS/AVF/AVLS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) revised Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for treatment of C2 varicose veins (VVs) by an analysis of content, methodology, level of evidence, and strength of evidence as well as by Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 2022 SVS/AVF/AVLS guidelines for VVs were compared with the 2022 ESVS CPGs on VVs for: specific methodology, evidence development, strength of recommendation, and level (quality) of evidence. Additionally, an AGREE II analysis was performed to compare the two guidelines. These guidelines were scored on six different domains as well as overall quality using a 7-point Likert scale according to the AGREE II methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The two CPGs differed in methodology and scope of content. The two guidelines varied significantly on their ratings of levels of evidence as well as their overall strengths of recommendations. The AGREE II analysis found that both guidelines scored as high quality in the domains of scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, editorial independence, and overall assessment. For the domain of applicability, ESVS guidelines (65.28%) scored significantly higher than SVS/AVF/AVLS guidelines (51.39%; <em>P</em> ≤ .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the methodology differed significantly between both guidelines, the overall conclusions remained similar, and both guidelines were rated as high quality by AGREE II analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","volume":"13 4","pages":"Article 102238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213333X25000733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the Society for Vascular Surgery/American Venous Forum/American Vein and Lymphatic Society (SVS/AVF/AVLS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) revised Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for treatment of C2 varicose veins (VVs) by an analysis of content, methodology, level of evidence, and strength of evidence as well as by Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) analysis.
Methods
The 2022 SVS/AVF/AVLS guidelines for VVs were compared with the 2022 ESVS CPGs on VVs for: specific methodology, evidence development, strength of recommendation, and level (quality) of evidence. Additionally, an AGREE II analysis was performed to compare the two guidelines. These guidelines were scored on six different domains as well as overall quality using a 7-point Likert scale according to the AGREE II methodology.
Results
The two CPGs differed in methodology and scope of content. The two guidelines varied significantly on their ratings of levels of evidence as well as their overall strengths of recommendations. The AGREE II analysis found that both guidelines scored as high quality in the domains of scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, editorial independence, and overall assessment. For the domain of applicability, ESVS guidelines (65.28%) scored significantly higher than SVS/AVF/AVLS guidelines (51.39%; P ≤ .05).
Conclusions
Although the methodology differed significantly between both guidelines, the overall conclusions remained similar, and both guidelines were rated as high quality by AGREE II analysis.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders is one of a series of specialist journals launched by the Journal of Vascular Surgery. It aims to be the premier international Journal of medical, endovascular and surgical management of venous and lymphatic disorders. It publishes high quality clinical, research, case reports, techniques, and practice manuscripts related to all aspects of venous and lymphatic disorders, including malformations and wound care, with an emphasis on the practicing clinician. The journal seeks to provide novel and timely information to vascular surgeons, interventionalists, phlebologists, wound care specialists, and allied health professionals who treat patients presenting with vascular and lymphatic disorders. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of these organizations and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
