Is poor chewing ability a risk factor for malnutrition? A six-year longitudinal study of older adults in Sweden

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100554
Duangjai Lexomboon , Abhishek Kumar , Sara Freyland , Weili Xu , Gunilla Sandborgh-Englund
{"title":"Is poor chewing ability a risk factor for malnutrition? A six-year longitudinal study of older adults in Sweden","authors":"Duangjai Lexomboon ,&nbsp;Abhishek Kumar ,&nbsp;Sara Freyland ,&nbsp;Weili Xu ,&nbsp;Gunilla Sandborgh-Englund","doi":"10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate if poor chewing ability increases the risk of malnutrition and to compare its impact with other contributing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Longitudinal observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Population-based survey.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>1,596 community dwelling individuals aged 60 years or older who participated in the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care at Kungsholmen in 2001–2004 (baseline) and in 2007–2011 (follow-up) and were not at risk for malnutrition nor malnourished at baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>The exposures were baseline chewing ability and change in chewing ability at follow-up. The primary outcome was malnutrition risk or being malnourished, as assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form. The secondary outcome was weight loss over 10% at follow-up. Logistic regressions assessed the associations between the exposures and the outcomes. The average marginal effects (percentage points) compared the effect of the exposure versus covariates on outcome probability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>150 (9.4%) reported having difficulty chewing hard food, while 191 (12.0%) had persistent difficulties chewing hard food or lost the ability during the follow-up. At the time of follow-up, 212 (13.3%) were at risk or malnourished, while 179 (11.2%) had weight loss of more than 10%. Self-reported difficulty chewing hard food increased the odds of being at risk or malnourished at follow-up (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.06, 2.53) and having weight loss of more than 10% (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.10, 2.68). Individuals who had persistent difficulty chewing hard food or lost the ability to chew hard food during the follow-up period were more likely to be at risk or malnourished (OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.26, 2.79) or had a weight loss of more than 10% (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.65). Having difficulty chewing hard food at baseline increased the probability of the two outcomes by approximately 6 percentage points, whereas the covariates increased or decreased the probabilities by 4–16 percentage points.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Poor chewing ability may be a low-risk factor for malnutrition in older individuals. Self-reported difficulty chewing hard food during dental visits should be addressed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","volume":"29 6","pages":"Article 100554"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1279770725000788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate if poor chewing ability increases the risk of malnutrition and to compare its impact with other contributing factors.

Design

Longitudinal observational study.

Setting

Population-based survey.

Participants

1,596 community dwelling individuals aged 60 years or older who participated in the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care at Kungsholmen in 2001–2004 (baseline) and in 2007–2011 (follow-up) and were not at risk for malnutrition nor malnourished at baseline.

Measurements

The exposures were baseline chewing ability and change in chewing ability at follow-up. The primary outcome was malnutrition risk or being malnourished, as assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form. The secondary outcome was weight loss over 10% at follow-up. Logistic regressions assessed the associations between the exposures and the outcomes. The average marginal effects (percentage points) compared the effect of the exposure versus covariates on outcome probability.

Results

150 (9.4%) reported having difficulty chewing hard food, while 191 (12.0%) had persistent difficulties chewing hard food or lost the ability during the follow-up. At the time of follow-up, 212 (13.3%) were at risk or malnourished, while 179 (11.2%) had weight loss of more than 10%. Self-reported difficulty chewing hard food increased the odds of being at risk or malnourished at follow-up (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.06, 2.53) and having weight loss of more than 10% (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.10, 2.68). Individuals who had persistent difficulty chewing hard food or lost the ability to chew hard food during the follow-up period were more likely to be at risk or malnourished (OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.26, 2.79) or had a weight loss of more than 10% (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.65). Having difficulty chewing hard food at baseline increased the probability of the two outcomes by approximately 6 percentage points, whereas the covariates increased or decreased the probabilities by 4–16 percentage points.

Conclusion

Poor chewing ability may be a low-risk factor for malnutrition in older individuals. Self-reported difficulty chewing hard food during dental visits should be addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咀嚼能力差是营养不良的危险因素吗?一项对瑞典老年人为期六年的纵向研究
目的探讨咀嚼能力差是否会增加营养不良的风险,并比较其与其他因素的影响。设计纵向观察研究。SettingPopulation-based调查。参与者:2001-2004年(基线)和2007-2011年(随访)参加Kungsholmen瑞典国家老龄化和护理研究的1596名60岁或以上的社区居民,他们在基线时没有营养不良或营养不良的风险。测量暴露是基线咀嚼能力和随访时咀嚼能力的变化。主要结果是营养不良风险或营养不良,由迷你营养评估简表评估。次要结果是随访时体重减轻超过10%。Logistic回归评估了暴露与结果之间的关系。平均边际效应(百分点)比较暴露与协变量对结果概率的影响。结果150例(9.4%)报告咀嚼坚硬食物困难,191例(12.0%)在随访期间出现持续咀嚼坚硬食物困难或丧失咀嚼能力。在随访时,212人(13.3%)有风险或营养不良,179人(11.2%)体重减轻超过10%。自我报告咀嚼硬食物困难的人在随访中出现风险或营养不良的几率增加(or = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.06, 2.53),体重减轻超过10% (or = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.10, 2.68)。在随访期间,持续难以咀嚼硬食物或丧失咀嚼硬食物能力的个体更有可能出现风险或营养不良(or = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.26, 2.79)或体重减轻超过10% (or = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.65)。在基线时咀嚼硬食物有困难,这两种结果的概率增加了大约6个百分点,而协变量增加或减少了4-16个百分点的概率。结论咀嚼能力差可能是老年人营养不良的低危险因素。应解决在牙科就诊时自我报告咀嚼硬食物困难的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: There is increasing scientific and clinical interest in the interactions of nutrition and health as part of the aging process. This interest is due to the important role that nutrition plays throughout the life span. This role affects the growth and development of the body during childhood, affects the risk of acute and chronic diseases, the maintenance of physiological processes and the biological process of aging. A major aim of "The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging" is to contribute to the improvement of knowledge regarding the relationships between nutrition and the aging process from birth to old age.
期刊最新文献
Adherence to various dietary quality indices of centenarian offspring in the New England Centenarian Study Baseline FDG-PET Brain hypometabolism as a predictive biomarker of cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease risk Advancing sarcopenia assessment with wearable and app-based technology: a scoping review Dietary patterns and longitudinal frailty progression in older Chinese adults: a nationwide cohort study Long-term variability in physiological measures and risk of frailty: evidence from two cohort studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1