Prediction model for coal chemical wastewater quality after catalytic ozonation process treatment based on deep learning algorithm: Performance evaluation and model comparisons

IF 7.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety and Environmental Protection Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2025.107059
Yihe Qin , Run Yuan , Xuewei Zhang , Xuwen He
{"title":"Prediction model for coal chemical wastewater quality after catalytic ozonation process treatment based on deep learning algorithm: Performance evaluation and model comparisons","authors":"Yihe Qin ,&nbsp;Run Yuan ,&nbsp;Xuewei Zhang ,&nbsp;Xuwen He","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we tested different models for predicting the effluent water quality of coal chemical wastewater treated by the catalytic ozonation process. The optimal model was further modified using the norm feature vector selection methods and intelligent algorithms. The average removal amount and average removal rate of COD in coal chemical wastewater treated by catalytic ozonation process were 223.62 mg/L and 57.98 %, respectively. AAO-pH, AAO-ammonia nitrogen, AAO-total phosphorus, AAO-COD, AAO-total phenol, SST- COD, SST-total phenol, and SST-turbidity were inputs for each model, while the catalytic ozonation-COD was used as the output for each model. We collected 500 samples of one year for the training, validation, and testing of various models. Compared to other models, the RF model had better predictive performance. Additionally, L1 method had a stronger optimization ability for the RF model than L2 method. Compared with BOA and SSA, IGWO had a larger contribution to improving the predictive ability. The L1-RF-IGWO model showed the best predictive ability (test set R<sup>2</sup> of 0.8717). The present results can aid coal chemical plants achieve data-driven management of water quality prediction and monitoring, providing ideas for the construction of models for predicting water quality in engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107059"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095758202500326X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we tested different models for predicting the effluent water quality of coal chemical wastewater treated by the catalytic ozonation process. The optimal model was further modified using the norm feature vector selection methods and intelligent algorithms. The average removal amount and average removal rate of COD in coal chemical wastewater treated by catalytic ozonation process were 223.62 mg/L and 57.98 %, respectively. AAO-pH, AAO-ammonia nitrogen, AAO-total phosphorus, AAO-COD, AAO-total phenol, SST- COD, SST-total phenol, and SST-turbidity were inputs for each model, while the catalytic ozonation-COD was used as the output for each model. We collected 500 samples of one year for the training, validation, and testing of various models. Compared to other models, the RF model had better predictive performance. Additionally, L1 method had a stronger optimization ability for the RF model than L2 method. Compared with BOA and SSA, IGWO had a larger contribution to improving the predictive ability. The L1-RF-IGWO model showed the best predictive ability (test set R2 of 0.8717). The present results can aid coal chemical plants achieve data-driven management of water quality prediction and monitoring, providing ideas for the construction of models for predicting water quality in engineering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习算法的催化臭氧化工艺处理后煤化工废水水质预测模型:性能评价与模型比较
在本研究中,我们测试了不同的模型,用于预测经催化臭氧工艺处理的煤化工废水的出水水质。利用规范特征向量选择方法和智能算法对最优模型进行了进一步修正。催化臭氧法处理煤化工废水对 COD 的平均去除量和平均去除率分别为 223.62 mg/L 和 57.98%。各模型的输入为 AAO-pH、AAO-氨氮、AAO-总磷、AAO-COD、AAO-总酚、SST-COD、SST-总酚和 SST-浊度,各模型的输出为催化臭氧-COD。我们采集了 500 个一年的样本,用于各种模型的训练、验证和测试。与其他模型相比,RF 模型具有更好的预测性能。此外,与 L2 方法相比,L1 方法对 RF 模型的优化能力更强。与 BOA 和 SSA 相比,IGWO 对提高预测能力的贡献更大。L1-RF-IGWO 模型显示出最佳预测能力(测试集 R2 为 0.8717)。本研究结果可帮助煤化工工厂实现水质预测和监测的数据驱动管理,为工程水质预测模型的构建提供了思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
Use of waste animal blood as a bio-based air-entraining additive in the production of sustainable hydraulic lime-based grouts Hydroxyl-rich g-C3N4 supported copper-cobalt oxide nano-fenton-like catalyst for aromatic pollution removal from aqueous solutions Experimental study on the inhibition of methane explosion by NH4H2PO4/ modified illite composite powder Bacterial community succession and gene function response in electroactive biofilm for enhanced thiamphenicol degradation under hydrogen evolution reaction potential Multi-scale rough structure membrane with switchable wettability for highly efficient oil-water separation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1