Public risk perception and treatment preferences for marine microplastic pollution: Choice experiments and the latent class model

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126924
Ya-Nan Zhao, Jing-Mei Li
{"title":"Public risk perception and treatment preferences for marine microplastic pollution: Choice experiments and the latent class model","authors":"Ya-Nan Zhao,&nbsp;Jing-Mei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marine microplastics are a new pollutant that threatens human health and the global marine ecosystem. The public is a direct victim of marine microplastic pollution (MMP), and the public’s behaviour and choices can also play a key role in the management of MMP. Assessing public risk perceptions and treatment preferences for microplastic pollutants can provide a basis for governments to improve the efficiency of pollutant treatment. On the basis of socioeconomic research data from the Jiaozhou Bay region of the Yellow Sea, China, a choice experiment model was used to test the public’s risk perception level and preferences for pollution management. The results of the study revealed that 69.23% of the public could perceive the health risks of marine microplastics. The public had the strongest governance preference for implementing marine microplastic-specific monitoring, followed by support for recycling measures, and the weakest preference for restricting the use of plastic products. Public health risk perception, age, and education influenced governance preferences. The heterogeneity analysis revealed that the public’s governance preferences can be characterized into two groups: “comprehensive governance” and “preventive regulation”. Recycling preferences were not significant in the “preventive regulation group”, with age and risk perception being the main reasons for the differences</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 126924"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125001013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marine microplastics are a new pollutant that threatens human health and the global marine ecosystem. The public is a direct victim of marine microplastic pollution (MMP), and the public’s behaviour and choices can also play a key role in the management of MMP. Assessing public risk perceptions and treatment preferences for microplastic pollutants can provide a basis for governments to improve the efficiency of pollutant treatment. On the basis of socioeconomic research data from the Jiaozhou Bay region of the Yellow Sea, China, a choice experiment model was used to test the public’s risk perception level and preferences for pollution management. The results of the study revealed that 69.23% of the public could perceive the health risks of marine microplastics. The public had the strongest governance preference for implementing marine microplastic-specific monitoring, followed by support for recycling measures, and the weakest preference for restricting the use of plastic products. Public health risk perception, age, and education influenced governance preferences. The heterogeneity analysis revealed that the public’s governance preferences can be characterized into two groups: “comprehensive governance” and “preventive regulation”. Recycling preferences were not significant in the “preventive regulation group”, with age and risk perception being the main reasons for the differences
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对海洋微塑料污染的风险认知和处理偏好:选择实验和潜在类别模型
海洋微塑料是威胁人类健康和全球海洋生态系统的新型污染物。公众是海洋微塑料污染的直接受害者,公众的行为和选择也可以在海洋微塑料污染的管理中发挥关键作用。评估公众对微塑料污染物的风险认知和处理偏好可以为政府提高污染物处理效率提供依据。以黄海胶州湾地区的社会经济研究数据为基础,采用选择实验模型,考察了公众对污染治理的风险感知水平和偏好。研究结果显示,69.23%的公众能够感知到海洋微塑料的健康风险。公众对实施海洋微塑料专项监测的治理偏好最强,其次是支持回收措施,对限制塑料制品使用的偏好最弱。公众健康风险认知、年龄和教育程度影响治理偏好。异质性分析表明,公众的治理偏好可以分为两类:“综合治理”和“预防性监管”。在“预防性监管组”中,回收偏好不显著,年龄和风险感知是差异的主要原因
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of anthropogenic activities on invertebrate communities in Dianchi Lake revealed by eDNA metabarcoding Mean annual temperature shapes distribution of the cryptic wader Ibisbill (Ibidorhyncha struthersii) in the Northwestern Himalayas Mapping stakeholders in plover bird conservation: An expert-based analysis of interest and influence Ecological niche modelling of Saussurea obvallata (DC.) Sch.Bip., a culturally and medicinally important threatened species of Indian Himalayan region Differential demographic responses of lion-tailed macaques to habitat fragmentation: Four decades of population monitoring in the Anamalai Hills, Western Ghats and perspectives for management and conservation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1