Prevalence, Timing, and Predictors of Patients Who Had New and/or Updated Goals of Care While in the ICU: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006663
David Lai, Ryan Ruiyang Ling, Claire Michel, Daniel Hwang, Tapan Parikh, Yannick Planche, Ryo Ueno, David Pilcher, Ashwin Subramaniam
{"title":"Prevalence, Timing, and Predictors of Patients Who Had New and/or Updated Goals of Care While in the ICU: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.","authors":"David Lai, Ryan Ruiyang Ling, Claire Michel, Daniel Hwang, Tapan Parikh, Yannick Planche, Ryo Ueno, David Pilcher, Ashwin Subramaniam","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Timely documentation of patient-concordant goals of care (GOC) in the ICU aims to promote patient autonomy and patient-centered care where the harms of interventions outweigh the potential benefits. This study examined the prevalence, timing, and predictors of ICU patients undergoing new and updated GOC documentation events while in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting and patients: </strong>All adults admitted to four ICUs from July 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome was to determine the prevalence, timing, and predictors of new-GOC and updated-GOC documentation events following ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors for new-GOC or updated-GOC documentation events using a backward stepwise elimination. Of the 2130 patients included, 13.3% ( n = 284) had a new-GOC documentation event, and 16.3% ( n = 346) had an updated-GOC documentation event. New-GOC events occurred sooner than updated-GOC events (median [interquartile range]: 18.3 [7.8-70.5] vs 73.7 [22.7-157.8] hr). Factors associated with GOC documentation events included age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), frailty (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.46), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 1.17-1.29), metastatic cancer (OR = 3.69, 95% CI, 2.17-6.26), ICU admission post medical emergency team review (OR = 1.94, 95% CI, 1.40-2.69), and cardiac arrest (OR = 2.23, 95% CI, 1.22-4.06) and if pre-ICU GOC had established treatment limitations, namely selective treatment goals (OR = 4.33, 95% CI, 3.18-5.90) or comfort-based treatment goals (OR = 7.66, 95% CI, 2.72-21.61). Apart from SOFA, all other factors remained significantly associated with GOC documentation events, even after accounting for ICU mortality as a competing outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost 30% of patients had new- or updated-GOC documentation events while in ICU. Increasing age, higher SOFA scores, metastatic cancer, frailty, cardiac arrest, and ICU admission post-MET review predicted GOC changes while in ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1389-e1401"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006663","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Timely documentation of patient-concordant goals of care (GOC) in the ICU aims to promote patient autonomy and patient-centered care where the harms of interventions outweigh the potential benefits. This study examined the prevalence, timing, and predictors of ICU patients undergoing new and updated GOC documentation events while in the ICU.

Design: Multicenter retrospective study.

Setting and patients: All adults admitted to four ICUs from July 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023.

Interventions: None.

Main outcomes: The primary outcome was to determine the prevalence, timing, and predictors of new-GOC and updated-GOC documentation events following ICU admission.

Measurements and main results: We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors for new-GOC or updated-GOC documentation events using a backward stepwise elimination. Of the 2130 patients included, 13.3% ( n = 284) had a new-GOC documentation event, and 16.3% ( n = 346) had an updated-GOC documentation event. New-GOC events occurred sooner than updated-GOC events (median [interquartile range]: 18.3 [7.8-70.5] vs 73.7 [22.7-157.8] hr). Factors associated with GOC documentation events included age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), frailty (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.46), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 1.17-1.29), metastatic cancer (OR = 3.69, 95% CI, 2.17-6.26), ICU admission post medical emergency team review (OR = 1.94, 95% CI, 1.40-2.69), and cardiac arrest (OR = 2.23, 95% CI, 1.22-4.06) and if pre-ICU GOC had established treatment limitations, namely selective treatment goals (OR = 4.33, 95% CI, 3.18-5.90) or comfort-based treatment goals (OR = 7.66, 95% CI, 2.72-21.61). Apart from SOFA, all other factors remained significantly associated with GOC documentation events, even after accounting for ICU mortality as a competing outcome.

Conclusions: Almost 30% of patients had new- or updated-GOC documentation events while in ICU. Increasing age, higher SOFA scores, metastatic cancer, frailty, cardiac arrest, and ICU admission post-MET review predicted GOC changes while in ICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在ICU期间有新的和/或更新护理目标的患者的患病率、时间和预测因素:一项多中心回顾性研究
目的:及时记录ICU患者和谐的护理目标(GOC)旨在促进患者自主和以患者为中心的护理,干预措施的危害大于潜在的益处。本研究调查了ICU患者在ICU期间发生新的和更新的GOC记录事件的患病率、时间和预测因素。设计:多中心回顾性研究。环境和患者:所有成年人从2023年7月1日至2023年12月31日入住4个icu。干预措施:没有。主要结局:主要结局是确定ICU入院后新goc和更新goc文件事件的患病率、时间和预测因素。测量结果和主要结果:我们使用多变量逻辑回归来识别新的goc或更新的goc文档事件的预测因子,使用向后逐步消除。在纳入的2130例患者中,13.3% (n = 284)有新的goc记录事件,16.3% (n = 346)有更新的goc记录事件。新goc事件发生早于更新goc事件(中位数[四分位数范围]:18.3 [7.8-70.5]vs 73.7[22.7-157.8]小时)。与GOC记录事件相关的因素包括年龄(优势比[OR] = 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.03)、虚弱(OR = 1.30;95% CI, 1.16-1.46),顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA) (OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 1.17-1.29),转移性癌症(OR = 3.69, 95% CI, 2.17-6.26), ICU入院后医疗急救小组回顾(OR = 1.94, 95% CI, 1.40-2.69),心脏骤停(OR = 2.23, 95% CI, 1.22-4.06),以及如果ICU前GOC有明确的治疗限制,即选择性治疗目标(OR = 4.33, 95% CI, 3.18-5.90)或基于舒适的治疗目标(OR = 7.66, 95% CI, 2.72-21.61)。除SOFA外,所有其他因素仍与GOC记录事件显著相关,即使将ICU死亡率作为竞争结果考虑在内。结论:近30%的患者在ICU期间有新的或更新的goc记录事件。年龄增加、SOFA评分升高、转移性癌症、虚弱、心脏骤停和met复查后的ICU入院预测了ICU期间GOC的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Criteria for the Definition of Refractory Septic Shock: A Joint Delphi Consensus from the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026. Sepsis and Subsequent Psychiatric Morbidity: A Nationwide Population-Based Matched Cohort Study, 2008-2019. Ready for Donation, Not for Death: A Qualitative Study of Families' Experience With Controlled Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death in Intensive Care. Executive Summary: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1