Get Vaccinated Now, But the Choice is Up to You: Framing, Psychological Reactance, and Autonomy Restoration Scripts for COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2025.2485296
Amber Marie Reinhart, Yan Tian, Amanda E Lilly
{"title":"Get Vaccinated Now, But the Choice is Up to You: Framing, Psychological Reactance, and Autonomy Restoration Scripts for COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.","authors":"Amber Marie Reinhart, Yan Tian, Amanda E Lilly","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2485296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Covid-19 is still a major public health issue in the United States and one of the most effective ways to minimize the damage caused by this illness is through encouraging individuals to receive vaccines and keep up with vaccine boosters. However, many individuals remain vaccine-hesitant. The current project examines the most effective way to persuade vaccine hesitant individuals through a textual message-based experiment. Psychological reactance, messaging framing (loss and gain), and autonomy restoring messages are examined to determine their effectiveness in moving the vaccine-hesitant to vaccine accepting. A 3 (frame: loss/gain/neutral) X 2 (autonomy restoration script/filler) between-subjects experiment was conducted using a sample of 605 participants over the age of 18 who either had not received any COVID-19 vaccine or any type of COVID-19 vaccine booster. Findings suggest that individuals who had not received any vaccination varied in their psychological reactance compared to those who had at least an initial vaccination. Framing was also found to play an important part in feelings of lost autonomy and that restoration messages helped reduce feelings of lost autonomy. Further, feelings of loss of freedom created more psychological reactance and could cause increases in vaccine resistance. Mediation effects were also supported, indicating that message framing and autonomy restoration influenced vaccine hesitancy indirectly through perceived threats to freedom and psychological reactance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"2973-2984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2485296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Covid-19 is still a major public health issue in the United States and one of the most effective ways to minimize the damage caused by this illness is through encouraging individuals to receive vaccines and keep up with vaccine boosters. However, many individuals remain vaccine-hesitant. The current project examines the most effective way to persuade vaccine hesitant individuals through a textual message-based experiment. Psychological reactance, messaging framing (loss and gain), and autonomy restoring messages are examined to determine their effectiveness in moving the vaccine-hesitant to vaccine accepting. A 3 (frame: loss/gain/neutral) X 2 (autonomy restoration script/filler) between-subjects experiment was conducted using a sample of 605 participants over the age of 18 who either had not received any COVID-19 vaccine or any type of COVID-19 vaccine booster. Findings suggest that individuals who had not received any vaccination varied in their psychological reactance compared to those who had at least an initial vaccination. Framing was also found to play an important part in feelings of lost autonomy and that restoration messages helped reduce feelings of lost autonomy. Further, feelings of loss of freedom created more psychological reactance and could cause increases in vaccine resistance. Mediation effects were also supported, indicating that message framing and autonomy restoration influenced vaccine hesitancy indirectly through perceived threats to freedom and psychological reactance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现在接种疫苗,但选择由您决定:COVID-19疫苗犹豫不决的框架、心理反应和自主性恢复脚本。
在美国,Covid-19仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题,最大限度地减少这种疾病造成的损害的最有效方法之一是鼓励个人接种疫苗并及时接种疫苗。然而,许多人仍然对接种疫苗犹豫不决。目前的项目通过一项基于短信的实验,研究说服犹豫不决的个人接种疫苗的最有效方法。对心理抗拒、信息框架(损失和获得)以及恢复信息的自主性进行检查,以确定它们在将疫苗犹豫转变为接受疫苗方面的有效性。采用605名18岁以上未接种任何COVID-19疫苗或任何类型的COVID-19疫苗增强剂的受试者样本进行了3(框架:损失/获得/中性)x2(自主恢复脚本/填充)受试者间实验。研究结果表明,与那些至少接种过一次疫苗的人相比,未接种过任何疫苗的人在心理抗拒上有所不同。框架也被发现在失去自主性的感觉中起着重要的作用,恢复信息有助于减少失去自主性的感觉。此外,失去自由的感觉产生了更多的心理抗拒,并可能导致疫苗耐药性的增加。中介效应也得到支持,表明信息框架和自主恢复通过感知到的对自由的威胁和心理抗拒间接影响疫苗犹豫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Dedicated Workspace for Co-Located Healthcare Professionals: Affordances for Interprofessional Communication in Hospitals. Who Trusts AI for Health Information? A Cross-National Survey on Trust Determinants in Four European Countries. Value Added: Vicarious-Affirmation Strategies to Enhance Prediabetes Awareness Among High-Risk Hispanics. The Representation of Help Givers in First Aid Instruction Materials: A Multimodal Reception Study. Self-Disclosure of Mental Health via Deepfakes: Testing the Effects of Self-Deepfakes on Affective Resistance and Intention to Seek Mental Health Support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1