Eating disorder screening measures in post-9/11 veteran men and women.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1037/pas0001369
Karen S Mitchell, Kelsey N Serier, Dawne S Vogt, Brian N Smith, Zafra Cooper
{"title":"Eating disorder screening measures in post-9/11 veteran men and women.","authors":"Karen S Mitchell, Kelsey N Serier, Dawne S Vogt, Brian N Smith, Zafra Cooper","doi":"10.1037/pas0001369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eating disorders (EDs) are among the deadliest psychiatric disorders but are underdetected in health care settings, and the majority of people with these conditions do not get treatment for them. There is a need for well-validated and brief screening measures of EDs to aid in early detection and intervention. We compared the performance of two existing brief screeners in a sample of U.S. military veteran men and women, a population in which few evaluations of ED measures have been conducted. We investigated performance of these measures in the full sample and separately in the male and female subsamples. Participants completed a survey assessing EDs and related constructs. A subsample of potential cases and controls completed a diagnostic interview (n = 178). We conducted receiver operator curve analyses to determine cut scores on the two ED screening measures that best discriminated between cases and controls. We identified cut scores on the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire 7 (EDE-Q7) and the SCOFF (the acronym corresponds to the questions) in the full sample and separately among men and women. Model accuracy was fair to considerable for both measures, although internal consistency was low for the SCOFF. The EDE-Q7 performed fairly well among both men and women in this veteran sample. Brief and effective screening makes it more likely that providers will identify and potentially treat EDs in vulnerable populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"37 4","pages":"172-179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eating disorders (EDs) are among the deadliest psychiatric disorders but are underdetected in health care settings, and the majority of people with these conditions do not get treatment for them. There is a need for well-validated and brief screening measures of EDs to aid in early detection and intervention. We compared the performance of two existing brief screeners in a sample of U.S. military veteran men and women, a population in which few evaluations of ED measures have been conducted. We investigated performance of these measures in the full sample and separately in the male and female subsamples. Participants completed a survey assessing EDs and related constructs. A subsample of potential cases and controls completed a diagnostic interview (n = 178). We conducted receiver operator curve analyses to determine cut scores on the two ED screening measures that best discriminated between cases and controls. We identified cut scores on the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire 7 (EDE-Q7) and the SCOFF (the acronym corresponds to the questions) in the full sample and separately among men and women. Model accuracy was fair to considerable for both measures, although internal consistency was low for the SCOFF. The EDE-Q7 performed fairly well among both men and women in this veteran sample. Brief and effective screening makes it more likely that providers will identify and potentially treat EDs in vulnerable populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
9/11后退伍军人饮食失调筛查措施
饮食失调(EDs)是最致命的精神疾病之一,但在卫生保健机构中未被发现,大多数患有这些疾病的人没有得到治疗。有必要对急症进行有效和简短的筛查,以帮助早期发现和干预。我们比较了两种现有的简短筛选器在美国退伍军人男女样本中的表现,这是一个很少对ED措施进行评估的人群。我们调查了这些措施的性能在整个样本和分别在男性和女性子样本。参与者完成了一项评估ed和相关结构的调查。潜在病例和对照的子样本完成了诊断访谈(n = 178)。我们进行了受试者操作曲线分析,以确定两种ED筛查措施的分值,这两种措施最能区分病例和对照组。我们在整个样本中以及在男性和女性中分别确定了饮食失调检查问卷7 (ed - q7)和SCOFF(与问题对应的首字母缩写)的减分。尽管SCOFF的内部一致性较低,但两种测量方法的模型准确性都相当可观。在这个老兵样本中,ed - q7在男性和女性中都表现得相当好。简短而有效的筛查使提供者更有可能识别和治疗弱势群体的急诊科。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
期刊最新文献
Examining the factor structure of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS) in emerging adults: An exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Further validation of the MMPI-3 personality disorder syndrome scales in a community mental health sample. Establishing the measurement invariance of the Eating Disorder Inventory across Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic Black or African American, and non-Hispanic White adults. Compliance with event-contingent ecological momentary assessments and subjective follow-ups during drinking episodes. Expanding on the factor structure and construct validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) in a general correctional sample.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1