Personality Assessment Inventory-derived estimates of section III antisocial personality disorder and recidivism in a sample of men evaluated for sexually violent predator status.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1037/pas0001373
Jared R Ruchensky, Alison B Concannon, Aislinn R Kittle, Marcus T Boccaccini
{"title":"Personality Assessment Inventory-derived estimates of section III antisocial personality disorder and recidivism in a sample of men evaluated for sexually violent predator status.","authors":"Jared R Ruchensky, Alison B Concannon, Aislinn R Kittle, Marcus T Boccaccini","doi":"10.1037/pas0001373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Personality Assessment Inventory is a broadband self-report instrument of personality, psychopathology, and response style that is commonly used in Sexually Violent Predator evaluations. These evaluations typically involve assessment of personality pathology that is empirically associated with recidivism, such as psychopathic personality disorder. Over the past several years, researchers have developed rescoring procedures for the Personality Assessment Inventory that compute information on the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders-a hybrid dimensional-categorical model of personality functioning (Criterion A) and pathological traits (Criterion B). Although these scores are available for applied use, there is limited work on their psychometric properties in forensic evaluations. The present study examines whether antisocial personality disorder and related facets predict recidivism in a sample of incarcerated men evaluated for Sexually Violent Predator status. Results suggest these scores modestly predict most forms of recidivism and sex offender registry violations. However, no score predicted sexual recidivism. This pattern suggests that these scores can inform consideration of risk for certain forms of recidivism (e.g., violent), but are perhaps less useful for determining risk of additional sexual offenses. These results provide preliminary evidence that these Personality Assessment Inventory scores modestly predict outcomes relevant to forensic practitioners and may be a viable approach to measuring personality pathology that is commonly assessed in forensic work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"37 4","pages":"194-200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Personality Assessment Inventory is a broadband self-report instrument of personality, psychopathology, and response style that is commonly used in Sexually Violent Predator evaluations. These evaluations typically involve assessment of personality pathology that is empirically associated with recidivism, such as psychopathic personality disorder. Over the past several years, researchers have developed rescoring procedures for the Personality Assessment Inventory that compute information on the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders-a hybrid dimensional-categorical model of personality functioning (Criterion A) and pathological traits (Criterion B). Although these scores are available for applied use, there is limited work on their psychometric properties in forensic evaluations. The present study examines whether antisocial personality disorder and related facets predict recidivism in a sample of incarcerated men evaluated for Sexually Violent Predator status. Results suggest these scores modestly predict most forms of recidivism and sex offender registry violations. However, no score predicted sexual recidivism. This pattern suggests that these scores can inform consideration of risk for certain forms of recidivism (e.g., violent), but are perhaps less useful for determining risk of additional sexual offenses. These results provide preliminary evidence that these Personality Assessment Inventory scores modestly predict outcomes relevant to forensic practitioners and may be a viable approach to measuring personality pathology that is commonly assessed in forensic work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格评估量表衍生的第三部分反社会人格障碍和累犯的估计在一个被评估为性暴力掠夺者的男性样本中。
人格评估量表是一种人格、精神病理学和反应风格的宽带自我报告工具,通常用于性暴力掠夺者评估。这些评估通常包括与惯犯有关的人格病理学评估,如精神病性人格障碍。在过去的几年里,研究人员开发了人格评估清单的评分程序,该程序计算人格障碍替代模型的信息-人格功能(标准A)和病理特征(标准B)的混合维度分类模型。尽管这些分数可用于应用,但在法医评估中对其心理测量特性的研究有限。本研究考察了反社会人格障碍及其相关方面是否可以预测性暴力掠夺者状态的监禁男性样本的再犯。结果表明,这些分数可以适度预测大多数形式的再犯和性犯罪者登记违规行为。然而,没有得分预测性再犯。这种模式表明,这些分数可以告知考虑某些形式的再犯风险(例如,暴力),但对于确定其他性犯罪的风险可能不太有用。这些结果提供了初步的证据,这些人格评估量表得分适度地预测了与法医从业人员相关的结果,可能是一种可行的方法来测量法医工作中通常评估的人格病理学。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
期刊最新文献
Further validation of the MMPI-3 personality disorder syndrome scales in a community mental health sample. Reliable and clinically significant change in Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised (SCS-R) scores among high-risk psychiatric outpatients. A nondogmatic approach to boldness: Reply to Athar et al. (2026). From controversy to confusion: A commentary on how Marcus et al.'s (2025) Psychopathic Boldness Scale further muddies the boldness construct. The distracted participant? Experience sampling response behavior and participant disturbance in social situations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1