Shifting landscape of terrorism: A 50-year spatiotemporal analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-30 DOI:10.1111/risa.70018
Shupeng Lyu, Chen Qian, Ching-Hung Lee
{"title":"Shifting landscape of terrorism: A 50-year spatiotemporal analysis.","authors":"Shupeng Lyu, Chen Qian, Ching-Hung Lee","doi":"10.1111/risa.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to analyze the spatiotemporal evolutionary characteristics of global terrorism from 1970 to 2020, providing a comprehensive understanding of its dynamics and patterns. The research seeks to fill gaps in existing literature by integrating geographic perspectives and methods to enhance the understanding of terrorism's spatial and temporal dimensions. The study employs a multi-methodological approach, combining the Mann-Kendall trend test, spatial autocorrelation analysis, kernel density estimation, and standard deviational ellipse. These methods are applied to data from 176 countries, covering 171,327 terrorist incidents recorded in the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) from 1970 to 2020. Pertinent findings are as follows. Temporally, global terrorism risk has evolved significantly over the past five decades and involves four distinct stages, i.e., emerging stage (1970-1991), descending stage (1992-2000), rampant stage (2001-2014), and attenuating stage (2015-2020). Meanwhile, 117 countries show an increasing trend, and 56 countries show a decreasing trend in terrorism risk. Spatially, the distribution of global terrorism is characterized by clustering and aggregation, with a constant shift in the gravity center and dominant direction. In addition, the spatial hotspots of global terrorism are predominantly presented as \"two major core circles and multiple sub-centers.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"2375-2389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the spatiotemporal evolutionary characteristics of global terrorism from 1970 to 2020, providing a comprehensive understanding of its dynamics and patterns. The research seeks to fill gaps in existing literature by integrating geographic perspectives and methods to enhance the understanding of terrorism's spatial and temporal dimensions. The study employs a multi-methodological approach, combining the Mann-Kendall trend test, spatial autocorrelation analysis, kernel density estimation, and standard deviational ellipse. These methods are applied to data from 176 countries, covering 171,327 terrorist incidents recorded in the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) from 1970 to 2020. Pertinent findings are as follows. Temporally, global terrorism risk has evolved significantly over the past five decades and involves four distinct stages, i.e., emerging stage (1970-1991), descending stage (1992-2000), rampant stage (2001-2014), and attenuating stage (2015-2020). Meanwhile, 117 countries show an increasing trend, and 56 countries show a decreasing trend in terrorism risk. Spatially, the distribution of global terrorism is characterized by clustering and aggregation, with a constant shift in the gravity center and dominant direction. In addition, the spatial hotspots of global terrorism are predominantly presented as "two major core circles and multiple sub-centers."

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恐怖主义的变化:一个50年的时空分析。
本研究旨在分析1970 - 2020年全球恐怖主义的时空演变特征,全面了解其动态和模式。本研究旨在通过整合地理视角和方法来填补现有文献的空白,以增强对恐怖主义空间和时间维度的理解。本研究采用多方法方法,结合Mann-Kendall趋势检验、空间自相关分析、核密度估计和标准差椭圆。这些方法应用于176个国家的数据,涵盖了1970年至2020年全球恐怖主义数据库(GTD)中记录的171327起恐怖事件。相关发现如下。从时间上看,全球恐怖主义风险在过去五十年中发生了显著的演变,分为四个不同的阶段,即新兴阶段(1970-1991年)、下降阶段(1992-2000年)、猖獗阶段(2001-2014年)和衰减阶段(2015-2020年)。同时,117个国家的恐怖主义风险呈上升趋势,56个国家的恐怖主义风险呈下降趋势。在空间上,全球恐怖主义的分布具有聚集性和聚集性的特征,其重心和优势方向在不断变化。此外,全球恐怖主义的空间热点主要表现为“两大核心圈和多个副中心”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
期刊最新文献
Scheduling Repair Resources for Post-Disaster Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Review of Models and Algorithms. Risk Assessment and Management of Brucella canis Introduction via Commercial Dog Imports Into France. Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions and Health Improvements: A Life Expectancy Framework to Harmonize Policy Traditions. Analysis of Regulatory Inhalation Unit Risk Estimates for Cobalt: Comparison to Epidemiological Data. Development of Dose-Response Models for the Ingestion Exposure Route and Stillbirth Outcome for Listeria monocytogenes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1