Biomarker-driven optimal designs for patient enrollment restriction.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Statistical Methods in Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1177/09622802251327690
Alessandro Baldi Antognini, Sara Cecconi, Rosamarie Frieri, Maroussa Zagoraiou
{"title":"Biomarker-driven optimal designs for patient enrollment restriction.","authors":"Alessandro Baldi Antognini, Sara Cecconi, Rosamarie Frieri, Maroussa Zagoraiou","doi":"10.1177/09622802251327690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapidly developing field of personalized medicine is giving the opportunity to treat patients with a specific regimen according to their individual demographic, biological, or genomic characteristics, known also as biomarkers. While binary biomarkers simplify subgroup selection, challenges arise in the presence of continuous ones, which are often categorized based on data-driven quantiles. In the context of binary response trials for treatment comparisons, this paper proposes a method for determining the optimal cutoff of a continuous predictive biomarker to discriminate between sensitive and insensitive patients, based on their relative risk. We derived the optimal design to estimate such a cutoff, which requires a set of equality constraints that involve the unknown model parameters and the patients' biomarker values and are not directly attainable. To implement the optimal design, a novel covariate-adjusted response-adaptive randomization is introduced, aimed at sequentially minimizing the Euclidean distance between the current allocation and the optimum. An extensive simulation study shows the performance of the proposed approach in terms of estimation efficiency and variance of the estimated cutoff. Finally, we show the potential severe ethical impact of adopting the data-dependent median to identify the subpopulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1821-1837"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802251327690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapidly developing field of personalized medicine is giving the opportunity to treat patients with a specific regimen according to their individual demographic, biological, or genomic characteristics, known also as biomarkers. While binary biomarkers simplify subgroup selection, challenges arise in the presence of continuous ones, which are often categorized based on data-driven quantiles. In the context of binary response trials for treatment comparisons, this paper proposes a method for determining the optimal cutoff of a continuous predictive biomarker to discriminate between sensitive and insensitive patients, based on their relative risk. We derived the optimal design to estimate such a cutoff, which requires a set of equality constraints that involve the unknown model parameters and the patients' biomarker values and are not directly attainable. To implement the optimal design, a novel covariate-adjusted response-adaptive randomization is introduced, aimed at sequentially minimizing the Euclidean distance between the current allocation and the optimum. An extensive simulation study shows the performance of the proposed approach in terms of estimation efficiency and variance of the estimated cutoff. Finally, we show the potential severe ethical impact of adopting the data-dependent median to identify the subpopulations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物标志物驱动的患者入组限制优化设计。
快速发展的个性化医疗领域提供了根据患者个人人口统计学、生物学或基因组特征(也称为生物标志物)对患者进行特定治疗的机会。虽然二元生物标志物简化了亚组选择,但在连续生物标志物的存在下出现了挑战,这些生物标志物通常基于数据驱动的分位数进行分类。在治疗比较的二元反应试验的背景下,本文提出了一种方法来确定一个连续的预测性生物标志物的最佳截止,以区分敏感和不敏感的患者,基于他们的相对风险。我们导出了最优设计来估计这样的截止值,这需要一组涉及未知模型参数和患者生物标志物值的等式约束,并且不能直接获得。为了实现优化设计,引入了一种新的协变量调整响应自适应随机化方法,旨在依次最小化当前分配与最优分配之间的欧几里得距离。广泛的仿真研究表明了该方法在估计效率和估计截止方差方面的性能。最后,我们展示了采用数据依赖的中位数来识别亚种群的潜在严重伦理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Restricted mean survival time in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Improving variance estimation of the intervention effect from the pseudo-values regression. Grouped multi-trajectory modeling using finite mixtures of multivariate contaminated normal linear mixed model. Joint modeling of composite quantile regression for multiple ordinal longitudinal data with its applications to a dementia dataset. A two-stage joint modeling approach for multiple longitudinal markers and time-to-event data. Joint model with latent disease age: Overcoming the need for reference time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1