[Operationalization of the determination of the Barthel index using Barthel plus].

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1007/s00391-025-02436-2
Sonja Krupp, Jennifer Kasper, Christina Gollmer, Friedrich Balck, Meike Kasten, Martin Willkomm
{"title":"[Operationalization of the determination of the Barthel index using Barthel plus].","authors":"Sonja Krupp, Jennifer Kasper, Christina Gollmer, Friedrich Balck, Meike Kasten, Martin Willkomm","doi":"10.1007/s00391-025-02436-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Barthel Index is the most commonly used instrument for assessing basic self-care ability; however, it only records impairments first at the stage of needing personal support.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Based on the long version of the Hamburg Classification Manual (HEMB-L), the Barthel plus (Bplus) was developed in consultation with specialist nursing personnel as an operationalization that also depicts compensated impairments via point-neutral subscaling. The article presents the instrument and its quality characteristics.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>For patients in acute geriatric care the Bplus was employed twice at an interval of more than 1 week and audio recordings were made. The Bplus was assessed by telephone 1, 12, 24 and 36 months after discharge. The effect size (Cohen's d) was calculated for the sensitivity to change during the inpatient course. The interrater reliability and agreement with the HEMB‑L were determined taking the evaluation of the audio files by blinded examiners into account.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 29 April 2019 and 25 June 2021 a total of 124 patients were included in the study. The Barthel Index scores obtained using the Bplus and HEMB‑L did not show a significant difference. The interrater reliability, internal consistency and change sensitivity of the Bplus were high, each at > 0.9. For activities performed independently but with impairment, there was an increased risk of care dependency occurring over the course of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While maintaining the same sum score as the HEMB‑L, the Bplus can highlight abilities prone to a high risk for loss of independence and thus facilitate the prevention of progressive care dependency.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":"590-595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12568913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-025-02436-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Barthel Index is the most commonly used instrument for assessing basic self-care ability; however, it only records impairments first at the stage of needing personal support.

Objective: Based on the long version of the Hamburg Classification Manual (HEMB-L), the Barthel plus (Bplus) was developed in consultation with specialist nursing personnel as an operationalization that also depicts compensated impairments via point-neutral subscaling. The article presents the instrument and its quality characteristics.

Material and methods: For patients in acute geriatric care the Bplus was employed twice at an interval of more than 1 week and audio recordings were made. The Bplus was assessed by telephone 1, 12, 24 and 36 months after discharge. The effect size (Cohen's d) was calculated for the sensitivity to change during the inpatient course. The interrater reliability and agreement with the HEMB‑L were determined taking the evaluation of the audio files by blinded examiners into account.

Results: Between 29 April 2019 and 25 June 2021 a total of 124 patients were included in the study. The Barthel Index scores obtained using the Bplus and HEMB‑L did not show a significant difference. The interrater reliability, internal consistency and change sensitivity of the Bplus were high, each at > 0.9. For activities performed independently but with impairment, there was an increased risk of care dependency occurring over the course of the study.

Conclusion: While maintaining the same sum score as the HEMB‑L, the Bplus can highlight abilities prone to a high risk for loss of independence and thus facilitate the prevention of progressive care dependency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[使用Barthel plus确定Barthel指数的操作化]。
背景:Barthel指数是评估基本生活自理能力最常用的工具;然而,它只在需要个人支持的阶段首先记录损伤。目的:基于汉堡分类手册(HEMB-L)的长版本,Barthel plus (Bplus)是在与专业护理人员协商后开发的,作为一种操作化方法,它也通过点中性亚尺度描述代偿性损伤。本文介绍了该仪器及其质量特点。材料与方法:对老年急症患者,采用b + 2次,间隔1周以上,并录音。出院后1、12、24、36个月分别通过电话评估b +。计算住院期间对变化的敏感性的效应量(Cohen's d)。考虑到盲法审查员对音频文件的评价,确定了解释器的可靠性和与HEMB - L的一致性。结果:2019年4月29日至2021年6月25日期间,共有124名患者纳入研究。使用Bplus和HEMB‑L获得的Barthel指数得分没有显着差异。Bplus的判读信度、内部一致性和变化灵敏度较高,均达到> 0.9。对于独立进行但有损伤的活动,在研究过程中出现护理依赖的风险增加。结论:在保持与HEMB - L总分相同的情况下,Bplus可以突出容易丧失独立性的高风险能力,从而有助于预防渐进性护理依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
期刊最新文献
Abstracts der Jahrestagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Geriatrie und Gerontologie : „Altsein war gestern, Altwerden ist morgen“. [Oropharyngeal dysphagia as a neurogeriatric syndrome]. [Special considerations in geriatric anesthesiology : Aspects of perioperative management in older adults]. [Social space and narrative identity in old age : Approaching digitality in space and narration among persons in assisted living facilities]. [Framework conditions and conditions for success of digital education and participation in geriatric care facilities].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1