Obstetric quality of recovery: A weak surrogate measure of psychological distress and psychological wellness for cesarean delivery parturients-A prospective observational study.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1177/13591053251328993
Luc Saulnier, Anthony Chau, Philip Crowell, Susan Bright, Simon Massey
{"title":"Obstetric quality of recovery: A weak surrogate measure of psychological distress and psychological wellness for cesarean delivery parturients-A prospective observational study.","authors":"Luc Saulnier, Anthony Chau, Philip Crowell, Susan Bright, Simon Massey","doi":"10.1177/13591053251328993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The obstetric quality of recovery score (ObsQoR-11) is a widely used self-report assessment in obstetric settings following cesarean deliveries (CD). However, this measure may not assess psychological variables as originally intended, which may inform quality care. The primary aim of this study was to explore the relationship between ObsQoR-11 and validated scales that measure peritraumatic distress and psychological wellness. 220 Canadian patients who underwent scheduled or unscheduled CD (mean age = 35.00 years, SD = 4.18) completed self-report surveys assessing: obstetric quality of recovery, peritraumatic distress, and psychological wellness. ObsQoR-11 exhibited significant but weak correlations with peritraumatic distress and psychological wellness. Peritraumatic distress and psychological wellness are independent constructs that should be measured separately in clinical practice outside of routine assessments using ObsQoR-11. As there was low convergent construct validity with these two measures, these psychological assessments may assist in providing additional assessments of holistic outcomes following cesarean delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"3946-3960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251328993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The obstetric quality of recovery score (ObsQoR-11) is a widely used self-report assessment in obstetric settings following cesarean deliveries (CD). However, this measure may not assess psychological variables as originally intended, which may inform quality care. The primary aim of this study was to explore the relationship between ObsQoR-11 and validated scales that measure peritraumatic distress and psychological wellness. 220 Canadian patients who underwent scheduled or unscheduled CD (mean age = 35.00 years, SD = 4.18) completed self-report surveys assessing: obstetric quality of recovery, peritraumatic distress, and psychological wellness. ObsQoR-11 exhibited significant but weak correlations with peritraumatic distress and psychological wellness. Peritraumatic distress and psychological wellness are independent constructs that should be measured separately in clinical practice outside of routine assessments using ObsQoR-11. As there was low convergent construct validity with these two measures, these psychological assessments may assist in providing additional assessments of holistic outcomes following cesarean delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科康复质量:对剖宫产产妇心理困扰和心理健康的一项弱替代测量——一项前瞻性观察研究。
产科恢复质量评分(ObsQoR-11)是在剖宫产(CD)后产科环境中广泛使用的自我报告评估。然而,这一措施可能不像最初预期的那样评估心理变量,而心理变量可能会影响护理质量。本研究的主要目的是探讨ObsQoR-11与测量创伤周围痛苦和心理健康的有效量表之间的关系。220名接受计划或非计划CD的加拿大患者(年龄35.00岁,SD = 4.18)完成了自我报告调查,评估:产科恢复质量、创伤周围窘迫和心理健康。ObsQoR-11与创伤周围窘迫和心理健康表现出显著但微弱的相关性。创伤周围窘迫和心理健康是独立的概念,应在临床实践中使用ObsQoR-11进行常规评估之外单独测量。由于这两种测量方法的收敛结构效度较低,这些心理评估可能有助于对剖宫产后的整体结果提供额外的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Measuring Menstrual Health Literacy: Development and validation of the Menstrual Health Literacy Scale. Eating profiles and health among African Americans with serious mental illness who are overweight. Attachment and appetite: How parental bonds influence college students' eating habits and food-related moods. Cognitive behaviour therapy-informed guidelines for type 2 diabetes self-management: A Delphi method study. Exploring the link between internalized weight stigma and meal skipping behavior in Black young adult women: A brief report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1