Editorial Commentary: Thickened Meniscus, Extrusion, Truncation, Ghost Sign, Cleft Sign, and Bony Edema Indicate Medial Meniscus Root Tear On Magnetic Resonance Imaging

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.049
Andrew S. Bi M.D. (Editorial Board)
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Thickened Meniscus, Extrusion, Truncation, Ghost Sign, Cleft Sign, and Bony Edema Indicate Medial Meniscus Root Tear On Magnetic Resonance Imaging","authors":"Andrew S. Bi M.D. (Editorial Board)","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medial meniscal posterior root tears (MMPRTs) can be challenging to diagnose even on magnetic resonance imaging. Despite several “signs” for MMPRTs, such as the “ghost sign” on sagittal images, truncation or cleft sign on coronal images, bony edema at the tibial root attachment, and meniscal extrusion on coronal images, the finding of increased maximal thickness of the medial meniscus on coronal images provides a simple, intuitive, and reproducible measurement for knee surgeons to identify MMPRTs. With a cutoff of 10 mm providing a sensitivity of 0.771 and specific of 0.942, the thickened meniscus sign is a valuable addition to the MMPRT literature. Even if exact measurements are not used because of racial anatomical or age-related differences in baseline meniscal size, the identification of a thickened medial meniscus on coronal sequences still provides a clue to avoid missing MMPRTs, as well as differentiating them from other meniscal tear patterns, such as radial tears.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"Pages 3369-3370"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325002452","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medial meniscal posterior root tears (MMPRTs) can be challenging to diagnose even on magnetic resonance imaging. Despite several “signs” for MMPRTs, such as the “ghost sign” on sagittal images, truncation or cleft sign on coronal images, bony edema at the tibial root attachment, and meniscal extrusion on coronal images, the finding of increased maximal thickness of the medial meniscus on coronal images provides a simple, intuitive, and reproducible measurement for knee surgeons to identify MMPRTs. With a cutoff of 10 mm providing a sensitivity of 0.771 and specific of 0.942, the thickened meniscus sign is a valuable addition to the MMPRT literature. Even if exact measurements are not used because of racial anatomical or age-related differences in baseline meniscal size, the identification of a thickened medial meniscus on coronal sequences still provides a clue to avoid missing MMPRTs, as well as differentiating them from other meniscal tear patterns, such as radial tears.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不仅仅是挤压!冠状面MRI显示内侧半月板增厚也提示内侧半月板后根撕裂。
内侧半月板后根撕裂(MMPRTs)即使在磁共振成像(MRI)上诊断也是具有挑战性的。尽管mmprt有几个“征象”,如矢状面图像上的“鬼影征”、冠状面图像上的截短或裂征、胫骨根附着处的骨水肿和冠状面图像上的半月板挤压,但冠状面图像上内侧半月板(MTMM)最大厚度增加的发现为膝关节外科医生识别mmprt提供了一个简单、直观、可重复的测量方法。随着10毫米的截止提供0.771的灵敏度和0.942的特异性,加厚的半月板标志是一个有价值的MMPRT文献的补充。即使由于种族解剖或年龄相关的基线半月板大小差异而没有使用精确的测量,在冠状序列上识别增厚的内侧半月板仍然提供了避免遗漏mmprt的线索,并将其与其他半月板撕裂模式(如桡骨撕裂)区分出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Iliopsoas Tunnel Deepening and Fractional Lengthening Relieve Painful Internal Snapping During Concomitant Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Propensity Matched Comparison. Editorial Commentary: Eight Is Enough For Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autograft Reconstruction. Editorial Commentary: Balancing Pain Relief and Function With Iliopsoas Tendon Treatment and Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy for the Internal Snapping Hip. Editorial Commentary: Posterior Visualization in Ramp Repair: The Only Path to True Healing. Editorial Commentary: Fourteen-Year Follow-Up Shows High Overall Incidence of Osteoarthritis With Anatomic Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Perform an Anatomic Reconstruction but Also Save the Meniscus!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1